C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Pd(II) complexes in Pd-PPh
rather than terminally bonded to the pore surface, which effectively
diminishes pore channel blockage, leading to higher SBET and D than
those of the grafted Pd-PPh -PMO(Ph)-G with an equivalent Pd loading.
Although Pd-PPh -PMO(Ph ) displays a similar mesoporous structure to
that of Pd-PPh -PMO(Ph) (see Figure S7), the wide-angle XRD patterns
Figure S8) demonstrate the crystal-like pore walls rather than the
amorphous pore walls, possibly as a result of the π-π stacking of biphenyl
2
-PMO(Ph) are embedded in the pore walls
P
2
2
2
2
(
13
groups.
As revealed in Table 1, Pd-PPh
and selectivity than corresponding Pd-PPh
5(Ph), and Pd-PPh -SBA-15 in water-medium Barbier reactions with the
same amount of Pd(II) used (see Scheme S1), obviously owing to the
higher SBET, the larger D , and the enhanced surface hydrophobicity
resulting from the Ph-modification, which facilitates the diffusion and
2
-PMO(Ph) exhibits much higher activity
-PMO(Ph)-G, Pd-PPh -SBA-
2
2
Figure 2. Recycling tests of the grafted Pd-PPh
2 2
-PMO(Ph), Pd-PPh -
1
2
PMO(Ph), and the Pd-PPh -PMO(Ph ) catalysts in Barbier reactions.
2
2
P
The assembly strategy has been successfully applied in the synthesis
of a novel bifunctional catalyst with Pd(II) and Ru(II) organometals
homogeneously inside ordered mesopore walls by co-condensation of
Pd(II) and Ru(II) organometal-bridged silanes with bis(triethoxysilyl)-
1
4
adsorption of organic reactants, especially in a water medium. Despite
the lower SBET and D , Pd-PPh -PMO(Ph ) exhibits similar activity to that
of Pd-PPh -PMO(Ph) as a result of the Ph -modified stronger surface
hydrophobicity. Remarkably, Pd-PPh -PMO(Ph) displays comparable
efficiencies in Barbier and Sonogashira reactions with the homogeneous
Pd(PPh Cl (Tables S1 and S2). Similar results are also observed for
Au-PPh -PMO(Ph), Rh-PPh -PMO(Ph), and Ru-PPh -PMO(Ph) catalysts
see Table 2). According to a standard procedure developed by Sheldon
P
2
2
2
2
benzene and P123 (see Figure S10). Impressively, such Pd@Ru-PPh
PMO(Ph) exhibits comparable efficiency with Pd(PPh Cl
Ru(PPh Cl in a water-medium “one-pot” Barbier-isomerization
2
-
2
3 2
)
2
/
3 3
)
2
3
)
2
2
cascade reaction and could be reused for at least 7 times (Figure S11).
In summary, we have developed a novel approach for the preparation
of ordered mesoporous organometallic catalysts with orgnometals embed-
ded in silica walls. Notably, they exhibit high catalytic efficiencies and
strong durability in water-medium organic reactions. Moreover, bifunc-
tional catalysts containing two kinds of organometals can also be
synthesized and explored in “one-pot” cascade reactions. The strategy
described in the study serves as a general approach for immobilization of
homogeneous catalysts with broad and practical applications.
2
2
2
(
15
2
et al., the Pd-PPh -PMO(Ph) catalyzed Barbier reaction is allowed to
proceed for 6 h with conversion exceeding 45%. After removing the solid
catalyst, the mother solution is allowed to react for another 12 h under
identical conditions. No significant change in either the conversion or the
product yield has been observed, indicating that the present catalysis indeed
is heterogeneous in nature rather than the dissolved Pd(II) species leached
2
from solid Pd-PPh -PMO(Ph).
Table 1. Structural Parameters and Catalytic Performances of
Organometallic Catalysts in Water-Medium Barbier Reaction
Acknowledgment. This work is supported by the National
Natural Science Foundation of China (20825724 and 50943048).
Pd loading
wt%)
S
BET
(m /g)
D
(nm)
P
Conv.
(%)
Select.
(%)
Catalyst
2
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
(
2 2
characterization of the Pd-PPh -PMO(Ph and Ph ) nanomaterials and
the results of water-medium reactions. This material is available free
of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
Pd-PPh
Pd-PPh
Pd-PPh
Pd-PPh
Pd-PPh
Pd(PPh
2
2
2
2
2
3
-SBA-15
0.85
0.54
1.7
1.7
3.9
/
389
145
438
654
444
/
3.9
1.7
3.6
5.7
3.3
/
56
61
78
93
92
96
71
88
91
96
95
94
-SBA-15(Ph)
-PMO(Ph)-G
-PMO(Ph)
-PMO(Ph
Cl
2
)
)
2
2
References
(
1) (a) Jacobsen, E. N.; Pfaltz, A. ComprehensiVe Asymmetric Catalysis I-
III; Springer: New York, 1999. (b) Crabtree, R. H. The Organometallic
Chemistry of the Transition Metals; Wiley: New York, 2009.
Table 2. Structural Parameters and Catalytic Performances of
Organometallic Catalysts in Various Water-Medium Organic
Reactions
(2) (a) Lindstrom, U. M. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 2751. (b) Li, C.-J.; Chan,
T. H. ComprehensiVe Organic Reactions in Aqueous Media, 2nd ed.; Wiley:
New York, 2007.
Loading
(wt%)
S
BET
(m /g)
D
(nm)
P
Yield
(%)
Catalyst
2
Reaction
(3) (a) Sheldon, R. A. Green Chem. 2005, 7, 267. (b) Metivier, P. Fine
Chemicals through Heterogeneous Catalysis; Wiley: Weinheim, 2001.
Au(PPh
Au-PPh
Grafted Au-PPh
3
2
)Cl
-PMO(Ph)
-PMO(Ph)
/
/
/
Hydration
Scheme S2
26
91
24
(
4) Corma, A.; Garcia, H. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 1391.
0.22
0.26
892
561
3.1
2.8
(
5) (a) De Vos, D. E.; Jacobs, P. A. Chiral Catalyst Immobilization and
Recycling; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2000. (b) Corma, A. Chem. ReV. 1997,
97, 2373. (c) Li, C. Catal. ReV. 2004, 46, 419. (d) De Vos, D. E.; Dams,
M.; Sels, B. F.; Jacobs, P. A. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 3615.
2
Rh(PPh
Rh-PPh
Grafted Rh-PPh
3
)
3
Cl
-PMO(Ph)
-PMO(Ph)
/
/
/
Heck
Scheme S3
86
84
71
2
0.42
0.47
606
513
3.7
3.2
2
(6) (a) Li, H. X.; Zhang, F.; Wan, Y.; Lu, Y. F. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 22942.
b) Li, H. X.; Zhang, F.; Ying, H.; Wan, Y.; Lu, Y. F. Green Chem. 2007, 9,
00.
(
(
(
5
Ru(PPh
Ru-PPh
Grafted Ru-PPh
3
2
)
3
Cl
-PMO(Ph)
-PMO(Ph)
2
/
/
/
Isomerization
Scheme S4
75
77
58
0. 40
0.43
589
479
3.8
2.9
7) Chong, A. S. M.; Zhao, X. S. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 12650.
8) Hu, Q. Y. J.; Hampsey, E.; Jiang, N.; Li, C. J.; Lu, Y. F. Chem. Mater.
2
2
005, 17, 1561.
As shown in Figure 2, Pd-PPh
durability than the grafted Pd-PPh
attributed to the incorporation of Pd(II) organometals into the silica
walls, which effectively inhibits the leaching of the Pd(II) active
2
-PMO(Ph) exhibits stronger
-PMO(Ph)-G. This could be
(9) (a) Fleminga, G. D.; Golsioa, I.; Celis, F.; Kochb, R.; Campos-Vallettec, M.
Spectrochim. Acta Part A 2008, 71, 1049. (b) Cinta, S.; Venter, M.; Fickert,
C.; Haiduc, I.; Scholz, P.; Kiefer, W. J. Mol. Struct. 1998, 446, 209.
(10) Inagaki, S.; Guan, S.; Terasaki, O. Nature 2000, 416, 304.
2
(
(
(
11) Kr o¨ cher, O.; K o¨ ppel, R.; Fr o¨ ba, M.; Baiker, A. J. Catal. 1998, 178, 284.
12) Chong, A. S. M.; Zhao, X. S. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 12650.
13) Kapoor, M.; Yang, Q.; Inagaki, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 15176.
1
6
phase and also enhances the hydrothermal stability (see Table
S3). Pd-PPh -PMO(Ph ) is even more durable than Pd-PPh
PMO(Ph) since the crystal-like pore walls exhibit strong hydro-
2
-
(14) Koyano, K. A.; Tanaka, T.; Nakata, S. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 9436.
2
2
(15) Sheldon, R. A.; Wallau, M. I.; Arends, W. C. E.; Schuchardt, U. Acc. Chem.
Res. 1998, 31, 485.
1
3
thermal stability than the amorphous pore walls, leading to the
preservation of ordered mesoporous structure even after 10 recycled
tests (see Figure S9).
(16) Herrera, J. E.; Kwak, J.; Hu, J. Z.; Wang, Y.; Peden, C. H. F.; Macht, J.;
Iglesia, E. J. Catal. 2006, 239, 200.
JA909596A
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 9 VOL. 132, NO. 5, 2010 1493