C.A. Zoto et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1105 (2016) 396e402
399
Fig. 5. Proposed two step reaction scheme for the photooxidation of I.
3
d
6
d
9.77 ppm (1H, aldehyde proton), two doublets at
.64 ppm (2H), which are aromatic protons and a singlet at
3.01 ppm (6H, eN(CH protons).
Guided by the proposed reaction scheme, the 1H NMR signals
that emerge at 8.52 (s), 7.58 (d), 2.993 (s), and 2.990 (s) ppm are
d
7.68 (2H) and
From this result, it is concluded that I does not react with O
significant degree over 40 min.
2
to any
3
)
2
Interestingly, as shown in Fig. 6 (c), irradiation/O
2
bubbling
experiments for I in CH OH showed no change in the absorption
spectrum over the course of 120 min. This result was a bit sur-
prising in that it appears to be in conflict with the H NMR data for I
which clearly showed 4-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde and the
3
d
1
assigned to the dione. Integrations were carried out on the emerged
1
H NMR signals and it was found that calibrating the singlet at
d
8.52 ppm, believed to be the vinyl H, to 1 the doublet at
integrates to approximately 4 (aromatic doublets), and the closely
spaced peaks at 2.993 and 2.990 ppm integrate to approximately
and 6 (2 ꢁ CH and eN(CH protons), which is consistent with
d
7.58 ppm
3
proposed dione as self-sensitized photoproducts in CD OD. The key
1
to understanding the apparent disagreement between the H NMR
and UVeVisible results is recognition of the fact that the NMR ex-
periments were performed with totally deuterated solvents and the
irradiations for UVeVisible analysis were performed using
undeuterated solvents.
d
4
2
3 2
)
the chemical structure of the dione. Further support for the pro-
posed reaction scheme is provided by LC/MS measurements which
showed signals with m/z ratios of 150 and 230, which are the M þ 1
values of the aldehyde and proposed dione photoproducts.
In addition to examining the self-sensitized photooxidation of I
It is known [28] that the lifetime of singlet oxygen is longer in
deuterated solvents than in their undeuterated form (see Table 1).
1
The difference is particularly dramatic for methanol in which
undergoes ~40ꢁ increase in lifetime (
reported value of 270 s in CD OD [29] compared to a relatively
short 9.5 s in CH OH [30].
The knowledge that the lifetime of singlet oxygen is significantly
longer in CD OD than in CH OH suggested using UVeVisible
spectroscopy to examine the photochemistry of I in CD OD under
2. The same concentration of I and similar irradiation intervals
O
2
1
using H NMR spectroscopy, photooxidation experiments of I were
monitored using UVeVisible absorption spectroscopy by collecting
D
t ) upon deuteration, with a
m
3
absorption spectra at different irradiation/O
series of UVeVisible absorption spectra of I in (a) C
and (c) CH OH at different irradiation/O bubbling intervals is
shown in Fig. 6. It is observed that the long wavelength absorption
band (S /S ) for I in C and CHCl decreases with respect to
increased irradiation/O bubbling time. Concurrently, emergence of
two higher energy spectral bands is observed. The highest energy
absorption band centered at ~330 nm conforms well to the ab-
sorption spectrum of 4-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde (shown by
the dashed line in each solvent). It is proposed that the second
emerged spectral band (lower in energy) 380e420 nm represents
absorption of the alkylamino substituted 1,2-cyclopentadione. The
location of this spectral band is in agreement with the conjugation
path length of this compound, intermediate between 4-
2
bubbling intervals. A
m
3
7
H
8
(b) CHCl
3
3
2
3
3
3
0
1
7
H
8
3
O
2
3
were used as in the study conducted in CH OH. It is shown from
Fig. 6(d) that photooxidation of I occurs in CD
products as in undeuterated CHCl and C
3
OD yielding the same
l
3
H
7 8
solvents. We propose
1
that the increased reactivity observed for I with
compared to CH
I and the lifetime of O
long enough, photooxidation of I is observed.
2 3
O in CD OD
3
OH is in general a function of the concentration of
1
1
2
2
in the solvent used. If the lifetime of O is
3.3. (E,E) / (E,Z) photoisomerization of I
dimethylaminobenzaldehyde and I.
1
To confirm that I is reacting with singlet (excited state) O
2
and
3
In their photoisomerization studies of the julolidine analogue of
I, Doroshenko and Pivovarenko [23] observed photochemistry in
. The dominant absorption band at approximately 465 nm,
not triplet (ground state) O
a solution of I in C , which involved wrapping the solution with
aluminum foil and bubbling the sample with O . It was shown that
essentially no changes were observed in the absorption spectrum
of I in C for the dark experiment between 0 min and 40 min.
2
, a dark experiment was carried out for
7 8
H
7 8
C H
2
representing the (E,E)-photoisomer, was reduced and a higher en-
ergy spectral band at approximately 350 nm increased in intensity
with prolonged irradiation, arising in a band difference of 115 nm.
7 8
H