ethylene under neat conditions without CO2 to give products in
moderate selectivity as shown in Table 2 (Run 1). Using
CH3CN as a liquid solvent, the reaction proceeded to 74%
conversion after 96 h to give the monoarylated product in 82%
selectivity (Runs 2 and 3). In contrast to these liquid phase
reactions, the outcome of the reaction in the scCO2–liquid
biphasic system was significantly improved, the styrene
selectivity increasing from 68 to 88% at near complete
conversion after 18 h (Run 4).13
In conclusion, the arylation of ethylene catalysed by Pd
complex with phosphite ligands selectively afforded mono-
arylated products in the scCO2–liquid biphasic system. A
combination of the rapid reaction in the liquid phase and the
extraction of the product with scCO2 provided a significant
improvement in the product selectivity.
Notes and references
† Safety warning: Operators of high-pressure equipment should take proper
precautions to minimize the risk of personal injury.
‡ Standard procedure for the arylation: The reactor was charged with argon
gas and was placed in the oven at 130 °C before introduction of reagents. A
mixture of the substrate (1.0 mmol), base (1.4 mmol) and DMF (0.01 mL)
solution of Pd catalyst (0.01 mmol) was added into the reactor with a syringe
through an opening against the flow of CO2. Subsequently, C2H4 (10 atm)
was introduced, and then CO2 (0–150 atm) was added with an HPLC pump.
After stirring for 18 h, the reactor was cooled in a bath of methanol with dry
ice. The mixture of C2H4 and CO2 was vented, and the reactor was slowly
warmed to rt. The yields of products were determined by GC analyses.
Fig. 2 Selectivity and conversion profile as a function of the CO2 pressure
for the reaction of iodobenzene 2a and ethylene catalysed by Pd complex 1
in condensed CO2. Condition: C6H5I+N(C2H5)3+Pd catalyst
=
1000+1400+1, C2H4 10 atm.
mainly due to the disappearance of the liquid phase since
everything dissolved in the scCO2, where the homogeneous
reaction in scCO2 possibly occurred. In fact, separate experi-
ments showed that the arylation using CO2-soluble trialkyl
phosphite–Pd catalysts12 in the homogeneous scCO2 phase did
not provide turnover numbers higher than those obtained in the
liquid phase. These results, in addition to the phase behaviour
discussed above, clearly indicate that below 100 atm of CO2
pressure the reaction occurs rapidly mainly in the liquid phase
to give the initial product styrene, which is effectively extracted
in the scCO2 phase because of its reasonably high vapor
pressure (430 mmHg at 125 °C) and high solubility in scCO2
under the reaction conditions. The use of supercritical or even
subcritical gaseous CO2 might help to separate the desired
product from the liquid reaction phase into the scCO2 or vapor
phase to avoid further reactions which may produce undesired
multiarylated products.
1 (a) P. G. Jessop, T. Ikariya and R. Noyori, Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 475;
(b) Chemical Synthesis using Supercritical Fluids, ed. P. G. Jessop and
W. Leitner, VCH/Wiley, Weinheim, 1999.
2 (a) P. G. Jessop, T. Ikariya and R. Noyori, Science, 1995, 269, 1065.
3 (a) A. Fürstner, D. Koch, K. Langemann, W. Leitner and C. Six, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36, 2466; (b) D. Koch and W. Leitner,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 13 398; (c) S. Kaintz, A. Brinkmann, W.
Leitner and A. Pfaltz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 6421; (d) M. F.
Sellin and D. J. Cole-Hamilton, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 2000,
1681.
4 (a) G. B. Jacobson, C. T. Lee, Jr., K. P. Johnston and W. Tumas, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 11 902; (b) B. M. Bhanage, Y. Ikushima, M.
Shirai and M. Arai, Chem. Commun., 1999, 1277; (c) B. M. Bhanage, Y.
Ikushima, M. Shirai and M. Arai, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40, 6427.
5 G. Franciò and W. Leitner, Chem. Commun., 1999, 1663.
6 P. Jessop, D. C. Wynne, S. DeHaai and D. Nakawatase, Chem.
Commun., 2000, 693.
A remarkable advantage of this biphasic system can be
demonstrated by the reaction of p-bromotoluene substrate/
catalyst = 100) and ethylene (10 atm) catalysed by complex 1
in the presence of (DBU) and 1-ethylpiperidine (Table 2). A
mixture of these bases serves as an efficient promoter for the
less reactive bromoarenes possibly because of their strong
basicity. Although the reaction of the bromoarene proceeded
much more slowly than that of iodoarene, it reacted with
7 (a) J. E. Plevyak and R. F. Heck, J. Org. Chem., 1978, 43, 2454; (b) W.
Heitz, W. Brügging, L. Freund, M. Gailberger, A. Greiner, H. Jung, U.
Kampschulte, N. Neißer, F. Osan, H.-W. Schmidt and M. Wicker,
Makromol. Chem., 1988, 189, 119; (c) J. Kiji, T. Okano and A. Ooue,
J. Mol. Catal. A, 1999, 147, 3.
8 C. A. Eckert, C. L. Liotta, C. W. Culp and D. R. Lamb, Chemical
Synthesis using Supercritical Fluids, ed. P. G. Jessop and W. Leitner,
VCH/Wiley, Weinheim, 1999, p. 446.
9 A similar reaction–extraction system consisting of water and super-
critical butene phases is now being used at Idemitsu Petrochemical Co.
in Japan. The hydration of butene proceeds in an aqueous phase to give
butan-2-ol, which can be extracted by supercritical butene. T. Yamada
and T. Muto, Sekiyu Gakkaishi, 1991, 34, 201.
Table 2 Pd-catalysed reaction of p-bromotoluene and ethylene in scCO2 and
other mediaa
10 Some examples of the catalytic activity of PdCl2L2 complexes under the
same conditions (conversion after 18 h), L = CH3CN 13%, P(OC2H5)3
44%, P(n-C4H9)3 52%, P(OC6H5)3 94%, T. Ikariya, to be published.
11 Some examples of the solubility of PdCl2L2 complexes (mol L21 at 200
atm and 80 °C): L = P(n-C4H9)3 5.6 3 1023; P(OC2H5)3 8.8 3 1024
;
CH3CN 2.5 3 1025; P(OC6H5)3 7.5 3 1025. T. Ikariya, to be
published.
12 Y. Kayaki, Y. Noguchi, S. Iwasa, T. Ikariya and R. Noyori, Chem.
Commun., 1999, 1235.
13 The homogeneous Mizoroki–Heck reaction of aryl iodides and activated
olefins such as methyl acrylate in scCO2 has been studied by several
groups. However, there are no examples of simple bromoarene as the
substrate; (a) M. A. Carroll and A. B. Holmes, Chem. Commun., 1998,
1395; (b) D. K. Morita, D. R. Pesiri, S. A. David, W. H. Glaze and W.
Tumas, Chem. Commun., 1998, 1397; (c) N. Shezad, R. S. Oakes, A. A.
Clifford and C. M. Rayner, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40, 2221.
2246
Chem. Commun., 2000, 2245–2246