ChemComm
Communication
Table 1 Photocatalytic deoxygenation of epoxides to the corresponding
epoxides other than p-conjugated epoxides such as styrene
oxide (entry 3). Ag–TiO2 was effective for deoxygenation of the
epoxide of an acyclic compound (entry 8), though longer reaction
time was required. In the deoxygenation of epoxides of alicyclic
compounds, less selectivity was obtained (entries 9 and 10). Since
these compounds are photosensitive, the selectivity may be
improved by the use of a gentle light source such as black light.
In summary, a new photocatalytic chemoselective redox system,
i.e., reductive deoxygenation of epoxides to the corresponding
alkenes and oxidation of alcohols to the corresponding ketones,
was examined at room temperature without the use of reducing
gases. Alkenes and ketones were simultaneously produced over
silver-loaded TiO2, and less reactive (2,3-epoxypropyl)benzene was
almost quantitatively reduced to allylbenzene without reduction of
the CQC double bond to propylbenzene even in the presence of an
H2 by-product. Chemoselective reduction of styrene oxides to
styrenes was achieved even over bare TiO2. Since alcohols other
than 2-propanol can be used as solvents and hole scavengers
(electron donors), various combinations of epoxides and alcohols
can be used. The results obtained in this study provide a wide
possibility of photocatalytic redox reaction including chemoselec-
tive production under gentle conditions such as room temperature
and atmospheric pressure without the use of reducing gases.
This work was partly supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research (No. 23560935) from the Ministry of Education, Culture,
Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) of Japan. H. K. is grateful
for financial support from the Faculty of Science and Engineering,
Kinki University. K. I. and A. T. appreciate the Japan Society for
the Promotion of Science (JSPS) for a Research Fellowship for
young scientists.
alkenes in alcoholic suspension of Ag(1.5)–TiO2 at 298 Ka
Entry
1
Epoxides
Alkenes
t/h
1.5
1.5
0.5
1.5
Yieldb/%
Sel.b/%
99
99
96
1
2c
99
3d
31
4e
99
99
5
1
1
96
85
97
85
6d
7
8
3
5
85
89
90
99
9
3
3
11
26
11
59
10
a
Reaction conditions: Ag–TiO2 (50 mg), substrate (50 mmol), 2-propanol
(5 cm3), room temperature, and under Ar. Determined by GC using
b
Notes and references
1 (a) E. J. Corey and W. G. Su, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1987, 109, 7534;
(b) G. A. Kraus and P. J. Thomas, J. Org. Chem., 1988, 53, 1395;
(c) W. S. Johnson, M. S. Plummer, S. P. Reddy and W. R. Bartlett,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 515.
c
d
an internal standard. Second use. Photocatalyst (bare TiO2).
e
2-Pentanol instead of 2-propanol.
photocatalysts may be explained by weaker or no interaction
with oxygen and a smaller activation energy for H2 formation
over the other metals.
2 R. C. Larock, Comprehensive Organic Transformations, Wiley,
New York, 1999, p. 272, and references therein.
3 (a) Z. Zhu and J. H. Espenson, J. Mol. Catal. A, 1995, 103, 87;
(b) K. P. Gable and E. C. Brown, Synlett, 2003, 2243; (c) J. B. Arterburn,
M. Liu and M. C. Perry, Helv. Chim. Acta, 2002, 85, 3225; (d) T. Itoh,
T. Nagano, M. Sato and M. Hirobe, Tetrahedron Lett., 1989, 30, 6387;
(e) H. Isobe and B. P. Branchaud, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40, 8747.
4 (a) Y. Mikami, A. Noujima, T. Mitsudome, T. Mizugaki, K. Jitsukawa
and K. Kaneda, Tetrahedron Lett., 2010, 51, 5466; (b) T. Mitsudome,
A. Noujima, Y. Mikami, T. Mizugaki, K. Jitsukawa and K. Kaneda,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 5545; (c) T. Mitsudome, A. Noujima,
Y. Mikami, T. Mizugaki, K. Jitsukawa and K. Kaneda, Chem. – Eur. J.,
2010, 16, 11818; (d) A. Noujima, T. Mitsudome, T. Mizugaki,
K. Jitsukawa and K. Kaneda, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 2986;
(e) T. Mitsudome, Y. Mikami, M. Matoba, T. Mizugaki, K. Jitsukawa
and K. Kaneda, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 136.
5 P. T. Anastas and J. C. Warner, Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice,
Oxford University Press, 1998.
6 M. A. Fox and M. T. Dulay, Chem. Rev., 1993, 93, 341.
7 (a) G. Palmisano, V. Augugliaro, M. Pagliaro and L. Palmisano, Chem.
Commun., 2007, 3425; (b) G. Palmisano, E. Garcia-Lopez, G. Marci,
V. Loddo, S. Yurdakal, V. Augugliaro and L. Palmisano, Chem.
Commun., 2010, 46, 7074.
8 (a) K. Imamura, K. Hashimoto and H. Kominami, Chem. Commun.,
2012, 48, 4356; (b) K. Imamura, T. Yoshikawa, K. Hashimoto and
H. Kominami, Appl. Catal., B, 2013, 134–135, 193.
Applicability of the Ag–TiO2 photocatalyst for a chemoselec-
tive redox system was investigated, and the results are summar-
ized in Table 1. Upon the re-use in deoxygenation of EPB to ALB,
Ag–TiO2 exhibited almost the same activity as that in the first use
(entries 1 and 2). Styrene oxides were reduced to the corres-
ponding styrenes selectively with high yields (entries 5 and 7) as
well as the deoxygenation of EPB (entry 1). When 2-pentanol was
used in place of 2-propanol, ALB was obtained almost quantita-
tively along with formation of 2-pentanone (entry 4, Fig. S2, ESI†),
indicating that various alcohols can be used for the present
chemoselective redox system. We also found that deoxygenation
of styrene oxide occurred even over bare TiO2 (entry 6), although
the performance was slightly lower than that of Ag–TiO2 (entry 5).
The use of metal-free TiO2 has another advantage that only
deoxygenation of epoxides occurs, i.e., eqn (3) does not occur
because H2 evolution requires co-catalysts such as Pt and Ag.
However, bare TiO2 did not show activities in deoxygenation of
4560 | Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 4558--4560
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014