648
Russ.Chem.Bull., Int.Ed., Vol. 51, No. 4, April, 2002
Bespalova et al.
liquid nitrogen and evacuated to 10–3 Torr, after which the
ampule was sealed. The reactions were conducted for 40 h at
60 °C. The violet (for WCl6) or darkꢀred (for WOCl4) solution
became darkꢀgreen, and a dark precipitate was formed. The
ampule was open, toluene was distilled off, and the residue was
distilled in vacuo and passed through a column packed with
SiO2 to separate the unreacted H2SiPh2 catalyst (eluent
nꢀhexane, Rf = 0.93). The mixtures were analyzed by the
GLC/MS method using toluene as the internal standard and
qualitatively by TLC on the Kieselgel 60F plates (Merсk).
The composition of the mixture after the reaction was 74%
compound 1, 11% isomers 1, and 15% 1ꢀbenzylꢀ10ꢀazaꢀ
spiro[4.4]nonꢀ7ꢀene (3). MS (EI, 70 eV), m/z (Irel (%)): comꢀ
pound 1, 241 [M]+ (30), 226 [M – CH3]+ (72), 212 [М –
С2Н5]+ (10), 198 [M – C3H7]+ (45), 172 [M – C3H5 – C2H5]+
(68), 91 [C6H5CH2]+ (100); compound 3, 213 [M]+ (52), 198
[M – CH3]+ (25), 184 [М – С2Н5]+ (50), 172 [M – C3H5]+
(86), 91 [C6H5CH2]+ (100), 77 (10).
The reactions of pyrrolidine 5 were carried out according
to procedures described for compounds 1 and 2, and no metꢀ
athesis products were observed. Gas evolution was observed at
the ratio [5] : [H2SiPPh2] : [W or Ru] = 2 : 2 : 1 and 20 °C.
This work was financially supported by the Russian
Foundation for Basic Research (Project No. 02ꢀ03ꢀ32024)
and the Program for State Support of Leading Scientific
Schools (Grant 00ꢀ15ꢀ97378).
References
1. K. J. Ivin and J. C. Mol, Olefin Metathesis and Metathesis
Polymerization, Acad. Press, San Diego, 1997, 134.
2. K. J. Ivin, J. Mol. Catal., 1998, 133, 1.
3. R. R. Schrock, J. S. Murdzek, G. C. Bazan, J. Robbins,
M. DiMare, and M. O´Regan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990,
112, 3875.
4. S. T. Nguyen, R. H. Grubbs, and J. W. Ziller, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1993, 115, 9858.
5. (a) M. L. Randall and M. L. Snapper, J. Mol. Catal., 1998,
133, 29; (b) R. H. Grubbs, S. J. Miller, and G. C. Fu, Acc.
Chem. Res., 1995, 28, 446; (c) H. G. Schmalz, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl., 1995, 34, 1833.
6. T. A. Kirkland, D. M. Lynn, and R. H. Grubbs, J. Org.
Chem., 1998, 63, 9904.
7. M. Scholl, T. M. Trnka, J. P. Morgan, and R. H. Grubbs,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40, 2247.
8. W. A. Hermann, A. Furstner, L. Ackermann, T. Weskamp,
and F. J. Kohl, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40, 4787.
9. A. Fürstner, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 3012.
10. A. J. Phillips and A. D. Abell, Aldrichimica Acta, 1999,
32, N3, 75.
The metathesis reactions at other [substrate] : [catalyst]
ratios and under the effect of the Ru(Ph3)3Cl2 system were
carried out using analogous procedures. The results are preꢀ
sented in Table 1.
B. Compound 1 (0.48 g, 2.0 mmol) in CHCl3 (35 mL) was
placed in a preꢀevacuated and filled with argon reactor equipped
with a reflux condenser. Then Ru(=CHPh)(PCy3)2(Cl)2
(0.0543 g, 0.066 mmol) dissolved in CHCl3 (5 mL) was added
in an argon flow. The concentration of 1 was 0.05 mol L–1. The
reactions were conducted for 7 h at the temperature of chloroꢀ
form boiling. Samples were taken each hour and analyzed by
the GLC/MS method using toluene as the internal standard)
and qualitatively using TLC on the Kieselgel 60F plates (Merсk).
The composition of the mixture after the reaction was 49%
compound 1, 24% compound 3, 13% PCy3, 10% (PhCH2)2O,
and 4% PhCH=CH2.
Metathesis of 1ꢀbenzylꢀ2,2ꢀdi(2ꢀpropenyl)piperidine (2) was
carried out using a procedure described above. Compound 2
(0.51 g, 2.0 mmol) was placed in a 60ꢀcm3 ampule. A toluene
solution of WCl6 or WOCl4 (0.1 mmol) and a solution of
H2SiPh2 (0.2 mmol) were added. The calculated amount of
toluene was added in such a way that the concentration of 2
was 0.05 mol L–1. The mixture was frozen to the temperature
of liquid nitrogen, and the ampule was evacuated to 10–3 Torr
and sealed. The reactions were carried out for 40 h and at
60 °C. The violet (for WCl6) or darkꢀred (for WOCl4) solution
became darkꢀgray, and then a dark precipitate was formed. The
ampule was open, toluene was distilled off, and the residue was
distilled in vacuo. The composition of the reaction mixture was
76% compound 2, 10% isomers 2, 14% 6ꢀbenzylꢀ6ꢀazaꢀ
spiro[4.5]decꢀ2ꢀene (4). MS (EI, 70 eV), m/z (Irel (%): comꢀ
pound 2, 255 [M]+ (2), 240 [M – CH3]+ (3), 214 [M –
C3H5]+(100), 91 [C6H5CH2]+ (60); compound 4, 227 [M]+
(20), 212 [M – CH3]+ (19), 198 [М – С2Н5]+ (38), 186 [M –
C3H5]+ (19), 172 [M – C4H7]+ (10), 136 [M – C6H5CH2]+
(16), 122 [M – C6H5CH2CH2]+ (37), 91 [C6H5CH2]+
(100), 82 (40).
11. J. F. Reichwein, C. Versluis, and R. M. J. Liskamp, J. Org.
Chem., 2000, 65, 6187.
12. A. Boto, R. Hernandes, and E. Suarez, Tetrahedron Lett.,
2000, 41, 2495.
13. D. J. Wallace, C. J. Cowden, D. J. Kennedy, M. S. Ashwood,
I. F. Cottrell, and U.ꢀH. Dolling, Tetrahedron Lett., 2000,
41, 2027.
14. H. S. Overkleeft, P. Bruggeman, and U. K. Pandit, Tetraꢀ
hedron Lett., 1998, 39, 3869.
15. N. B. Bespalova, M. A. Bovina, A. V. Popov, and J. C.
Mol, J. Mol. Catal., 2000, 160, 157.
16. N. B. Bespalova and M. A. Bovina, J. Mol. Catal.,
1992, 76, 181.
17. N. B. Bespalova, M. A. Bovina, M. B. Sergeeva, V. D.
Oppengeim, and V. G. Zaikin, J. Mol. Catal., 1994, 90, 21.
18. V. B. Pukhnarevich, M. G. Voronkov, and L. I. Kopylova,
Usp. Khim., 2000, 69 (2), 150 [Russ. Chem. Rev., 2000, 69
(Engl. Transl.)].
19. D. T. Hard, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1945, 67, 1554.
20. W. A. Kriner, J. Org. Chem., 1964, 29, 1601.
21. Yu. N. Bubnov, F. V. Pastukhov, I. V. Yampolsky, and
A. V. Ignatenko, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2000, 1503.
The reactions in the presence of the WCl6 (or
WOCl4)—1,1,3,3ꢀtetramethylꢀ1,3ꢀdisilacyclobutane catalytic
systems were carried out using the same procedure. The metꢀ
athesis products were not observed.
Received August 8, 2001;
in revised form February 11, 2002