Alunni and Ottavi
values of the solvent isotope effect.10 The proton activat-
ing factors determined with acetohydroxamate/aceto-
hydroxamic acid7 buffer at 50 °C, µ ) 1 M KCl are 2.7 ×
105 for isomer 1 and 5.2 × 106 for isomer 2; with the base
hydroxamic acid buffer, 50 °C and µ ) 1 M KCl). It is to
be considered that the kBN value in acetohydroxamate/
acetohydroxamic acid with these substrates was esti-
mated by the previously proposed LFER;7 this value is
then an approximation, but it is useful to calculate the
order of magnitude of PAF. These high PAF values are
similar to those determined with 1 or 2, and they can be
put in relation to the presence of a resonance stabilized
intermediate carbanion, formed from NH+, and an (E1cb)I
mechanism. The change in leaving group from the
tertiary amine to Cl or F shows the expected mechanistic
OH- they are 0.7 × 105 for isomer 1 and 1.1 × 106 for
NH+
OH
isomer 2 (calculated with the k
values from this
-
work). Substrate 1, in quinuclidine/quinuclidinium buffer,
shows acid-base catalysis as I or L (Table 3). So at pH
10.1-11 there is a competition between N and NH+ as
reacting species, but when NH+ is the reacting species
the consistent mechanism can be E2 or (E1cb)I. A
distinction between these two mechanisms can be made
considering the PAF value determined, PAF ) 1.2 × 106.
This value is similar to the value determined in aceto-
hydroxamate/acetohydroxamic acid7 buffer, where an
E1cb mechanism was demonstrated with NH+, so an
E1cb irreversible mechanism can be assigned in quinu-
clidine/quinuclidium buffer with 1. In agreement with
this interpretation is the fact that in acetate/acetic acid
and imidazole/imidazolium buffers an E1cb partially
reversible mechanism can be demonstrated; the change
to quinuclidine/quinuclidium buffer can be interpreted
as the expected mechanistic change to (E1cb)I, owing to
the lower acidity of QH+ (BH) and then to the increase
in the energetic barrier for the reprotonation of the
intermediate carbanion (decrease of the rate constant,
change associated to decrease in the barrier for leaving
+
group expulsion (increased value of kN2 H ) from (E1cb)R
to (E1cb)I mechanism. The catalysis observed with these
substrates is described by plot F (Table 3), and this is in
agreement with the sequences of steps N f NH+ f I2 f
P, as previously described. It is relevant to report that a
study of the non-steady-state kinetics of the elimination
reaction of HBr from 2-(p-nitrophenyl)ethyl bromide in
alchol/alkoxide media has been interpreted with two-
steps mechanism involving an intermediate carbanion;19
this substrate has a lower â-activation with respect to a
protonated pyridine ring and Br is a better leaving group
with respect to Cl or F. It is to be considered that an E2
concerted mechanism can have a transition state with
partial negative charge development at the â-carbon1
(E1cb-like transition state). However, we favor the simple
interpretation that to the same values of PAF is associ-
ated the same mechanism E1cb. The substrates studied
present different, but related structures, with variations
of Y and X. Mechanism assignment for a single substrate
is supported by applying, in most cases, the combined
use of two or three techniques. As previously discussed,
the interrelation between the various systems offers a
further possibility of mechanism assignment.
An interesting variation in the system is represented
by the variation of the buffer (consequently of the pH).
This point has been previously discussed. What we would
like to point out now is that, in our model, the variation
of the buffer system represents a mechanistic test of self-
consistency of the model. In fact, with substrates 1 and
2 we have an E1cb mechanism as mechanistic model. To
check conclusively the consistency of the model, an
important variation of the reaction system is made
(change of the buffer and pH). The variation is selected
to focalize the consistency of key parameters of the model
(in our case k∞). The analysis of the results due to the
variations made in the model can be a conclusive test of
the validity of the model. This situation in our systems
is exemplified in Figure 6.
NH+
BH
NH+
BH
k
). We consider, also, that the fit of k
with isomer
1 in quinuclidine in the Brønsted plot (Figure 5) can be
in agreement with an (E1cb)I mechanism in quinuclidine/
quinuclidinium buffer; in fact, the Brønsted plot is related
to the E1cb mechanism. A conclusion from the results of
an E1cb mechanism in quinuclidine/quinuclidinium buffer
is that the mechanism remains E1cb when the strength
of the base increases from acetate (pKa ) 4.65 at 50 °C
and µ ) 1 M KCl) to quinuclidine (pKa ) 11 at 50 °C and
µ ) 1 M KCl). It has been reported in the literature a
change in mechanism from E1cb to concerted E2 by
increasing the strength of the base.17
Substrates 2-(2-chloroethyl)pyridine,8 2-(2-fluoroethyl)-
pyridine,9 and 2-(4-fluoroethyl)pyridine9 from previous
studies show acid-base catalysis in acetate/acetic acid
and acetohydroxamate/acetohydroxamic acid buffers as
E or F (Table 3). From these results, it can be deduced
that the reacting species is NH+, and both an E2 or
(E1cb)I mechanisms are in agreement. To distinguish
between these two possibilities is generally very dif-
ficult.9,18 In our interrelated systems, however, these
substrates can be put in relation with 1 or 2. The PAF
value calculated with 2-(2-chloroethyl)pyridine8 is PAF
) 1.38 × 105 (acetohydroxamate/acetohydroxamic acid
buffer, 50 °C and µ ) 1 M KCl), PAF ) 3.6 × 105 with
2-(2-fluoroethyl)pyridine9 and PAF ) 0.65 × 105 with
The consistency of the results obtained can be seen in
Tables 1 and 2; the parameters that have to remain
constant, with the variation of pH and buffer systems,
remain constant, while those that have to change with
the buffer structure change consistently.
2-(4-fluoroethyl)pyridine9
(acetohydroxamate/aceto-
(17) J ia, Z. S.; Rudzinski, J .; Paneth, P. and Thibblin, A. J . Org.
Chem. 2002, 67, 177.
All of the interrelated systems, where Y is a pyridyl
or a quinolyl group,7-10,20 react by an E1cb mechanism,
with NH+ being the reacting species owing to the high
PAF values (a part 1 in quinuclidine/quinuclidium buffer
at pH 10.1-11, where there is a competition between N
(18) (a) More O’Ferrall, R. A.; Warren, P. J . J . Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1975, 483. (b) More O’Ferrall, R. A.; Slae, S. J . Chem. Soc.,
B 1970, 260. (b) More O’Ferrall, R. A.; Larkin, F.; Walsh, P. J . Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1982, 1573. (c) More O’Ferrall, R. A.; Larkin, F.
Aust. J . Chem. 1983, 36, 1831. (d) Larkin, F. G.; More O’Ferrall, R.
A.; Murphy, D. G. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1999, 64, 1833. (e)
More O’Ferrall, R. A.; Larkin, F.; Walsh, P. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 2 1982, 1573. (f) Carey, E.; More O’Ferrall, R. A.; Vernon, N.
M. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1982, 1581. (g) Kelly, R. P.; More
O’Ferrall, R. A.; O’Brien Myles J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1982,
211.
(19) Handoo, K. L.; Lu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Parker, V. D. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2003, 1, 24.
(20) Alunni, S.; Orazi, C. J . Phys. Org. Chem. 2001, 14, 879.
2280 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 69, No. 7, 2004