ϩ
the amine of values of k7 and Kc,7 indicates that steric hindrance
either to nucleophilic attack at the 7-position, or in the adducts
7, is not an important factor. The one exception may be in the
adduct 7f formed from N-methylbenzylamine where the value
of Kc,7 is unexpectedly low.
the parameter kϪ7kAmH /kAm for reaction of 3 are considerably
ϩ
lower than the corresponding values of kϪ1kAmH /kAm for reac-
tion of 2. This indicates that values of kϪ7 are likely to be con-
siderably lower than values of kϪ1. Thus the difference in the
nature of the rate determining step in the reactions of 3 and 2
with amines is likely to be a consequence both of higher rate
constants for proton transfer with 3 and also a reduction in the
value of kϪ7 relative to kϪ1.
Comparison with 1,3,5-trinitrobenzene
1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene, 2, is the bench-mark for comparisons of
reactivity in σ-adduct forming reactions.3 The results in Table 8
show that values of Kc,7 for reaction at the 7-position of 3 are
between three and eight times larger, for corresponding amines,
than the values of Kc,1 for reaction at an unsubstituted position
of 1,3,5-trinitrobenzene. (The values of ratios would be three
times larger if a statistical correction were to be applied to
account for the equivalent positions in 2.) This confirms the
excellent ability, reported previously21,22,27 in reactions with
alkoxides, of the 4-nitrobenzofuroxan system in delocalising
negative charge. Despite the higher thermodynamic stabilities
of adducts from 3, the values of k7 for nucleophilic attack are
considerably lower than values of k1 for reaction with 2. This
may be a consequence of the possibility, referred to earlier, of
the extensive charge delocalisation in the benzofuroxan system
which leads to higher intrinsic barriers to reaction.
The interesting exception is the reaction of 3 with N-methyl-
benzylamine. Here proton transfer is partially rate-limiting in
formation of both the 5-adduct and the 7-adduct. Since these
proton transfers must occur from the respective zwitterions 4f
and 6f to N-methylbenzylamine, large steric effects are likely.
ϩ
Hence values of kAm and kAmH will be reduced.
Experimental
4-Nitrobenzofuroxan was prepared, as previously described,28
by nitration of benzofuroxan: mp 143 ЊC (lit.28 mp 143 ЊC).
Amines and solvents were the purest available commercial
products. Amine salts were prepared as solutions in DMSO by
accurate neutralisation of amines, with the appropriate acid.
1H NMR spectra were recorded in [2H6]-DMSO with a
Varian Mercury 200 MHz spectrometer. UV–vis spectra and
kinetic measurements were made at 25 ЊC with a Perkin-Elmer
Lambda 2 spectrophotometer, a Shimadzu UV-2101 PC spec-
trometer or an Applied Photophysics SX-17 MV stopped-flow
spectrometer. Reported rate constants are the means of several
determinations and are precise 5%.
A further difference in the reactions of 3 and 2 with amines is
in the nature of the rate determining step. With 3 the proton
transfer equilibria between zwitterions and anions 6 7, are
generally rapid so that nucleophilic attack, the k7 step, is rate-
limiting in the forward direction. The only exception is in the
reaction with the sterically hindered amine N-methylbenzyl-
amine where proton transfer becomes partially rate determin-
ing. By contrast in the reaction of 1,3,5-trinitrobenzene with
amines the proton transfer step is generally rate limiting with
secondary amines and may be partially rate-limiting with pri-
mary amines.11 It should be noted that the zwitterionic inter-
mediates for both 2 and 3 are expected to be considerably more
acidic than the corresponding ammonium ions. In the case of 2
Acknowledgements
We thank Zeneca Fine Chemicals, Huddersfield for financial
support.
References
a value for kAm/kAmH of ca. 500 has been estimated,11 and the
ϩ
1 J. A. Orvik and J. F. Bunnett, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1970, 92,
2417.
2 C. F. Bernasconi, MTP Int. Rev. Sci.: Org. Chem., Ser. One, 1977, 3,
33.
3 F. Terrier, Nucleophilic Aromatic Displacement, VCH, New York,
1991.
4 R. Chamberlin and M. R. Crampton, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2,
1995, 1831.
5 R. Chamberlin and M. R. Crampton, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2,
1994, 425.
6 S. Sekiguchi, M. Hosokawa, T. Suzuki and M. Sato, J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 2, 1993, 1111.
failure to observe zwitterionic intermediates in reactions of 3
ϩ
indicates that kAm/kAmH ӷ 1. Hence the proton transfers from
zwitterions to amines, kAm, are thermodynamically favourable
processes. Nevertheless in the reactions of 2 values of kAm are
considerably below the diffusion limit. For example kAm has the
value 5 × 104 dm3 molϪ1 sϪ1 for the reaction involving piper-
idine.11 It has been argued that steric hindrance at the reaction
centre is responsible, and that this is more severe with second-
ary than with primary amines.11,15 It should be noted that this is
steric hindrance to proton transfer between the zwitterion and
amine as distinct from steric hindrance to nucleophilic attack.
The latter is thought to be unimportant when reaction occurs at
a ring carbon atom carrying hydrogen.
7 M. R. Crampton and P. J. Routledge, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2,
1984, 573.
8 J. F. Bunnett, S. Sekiguchi and L. A. Smith, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1981,
103, 4865.
The results for adduct formation from 3 show that the proton
transfer equilibria are generally rapid and are not rate-limiting.
This suggests that rate constants for proton transfer may be
faster in the 4-nitrobenzofuroxan system than in the 1,3,5-
trinitrobenzene system. This would be reasonable since 3 is a
considerably less sterically demanding reactant than is 2, where
reaction must occur ortho to two nitro-groups. There is evidence
that this conclusion is valid in formation of the 5-adducts, 5.
9 Y. Hasegawa, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1985, 87.
10 C. F. Bernasconi, M. C. Muller and P. Schmid, J. Org. Chem., 1979,
44, 3189.
11 M. R. Crampton and B. Gibson, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2,
1981, 533.
12 M. R. Crampton and C. Greenhalgh, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2,
1983, 1175.
13 R. Chamberlin, M. R. Crampton and I. A. Robotham, J. Phys. Org.
Chem., 1996, 9, 152.
14 E. Buncel and W. Eggimann, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1977, 99, 5958.
15 M. R. Crampton, P. J. Routledge and P. Golding, J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 2, 1984, 329.
ϩ
Thus in the reaction with piperidine kAmH has a value of
6 × 105 dm3 molϪ1 sϪ1 compared with a corresponding value
of 280 dm3 molϪ1 sϪ1 in the 1,3,5-trinitrobenzene system.
Although these values refer to the reverse proton transfers,
from piperidinium ions to the anionic adducts, they will largely
reflect the steric situation at the reaction centre. The factor of
2000 is consistent with less steric hindrance in the reaction
involving 3. Nevertheless for reaction at the 7-position of 3 we
must add the caveat that the nature of the rate determining step
depends on the value of the ratio kAm/kϪ7 rather than on the
value of kAm alone. The results in Table 8 show that values of
16 P. B. Ghosh and M. W. Whitehouse, J. Med. Chem., 1968, 11,
305.
17 M. W. Whitehouse and P. B. Ghosh, Biochem. Pharmacol., 1968, 17,
158.
18 P. B. Ghosh, B. Ternai and M. W. Whitehouse, J. Med. Chem., 1972,
15, 255.
19 F. Terrier, F. Millot, A.-P. Chatrousse, M.-J. Pouet and M.-P.
Simonnin, Org. Magn. Reson., 1976, 8, 56.
20 E. Buncel, N. Chuaqui-Offermanns, B. K. Hunter and A. R. Norris,
Can. J. Chem., 1977, 55, 2852.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1999, 2473–2480
2479