different radical anion intermediates are possible. Deproto-
nation of 9 would render cyanamide radical anion which by
electron transfer to 2 may continue the SRN1 cycle. Another
Table 2. Photoinduced Reactions of 1 with Aryl Halidesa
7
b
products yield (%)
possibility is that coupling of ion 1 with radical 9 would
form a new radical anion able to continue the chain
propagation. In any case, the products after ET would
probably be water soluble and hydrolyze during workup.
Further studies are in progress in order to clarify this step in
the propagation cycle. The thiolate ion 8 is able to add to
radical 6 and follows a new cycle of SRN1 reaction to afford
the disubstitution product 4 (step 3). Hydrogen atom abstrac-
tion from the solvent by naphthyl radicals gives the reduction
product naphthalene (5) (step 4). After irradiation, the
reaction mixture was quenched by methyl iodide to afford
the 1-(methylthio)naphthalene (3) (step 5).
entry
ArX
conv (%) ArH
ArSMe
Ar2S
50c
54d
1
2
3e
4e
5
6
7
8e
9e
1-Br-naphthalene
2-Br-naphthalene
PhI
4-IC6H4OMe
4-BrC6H4OMe
4-BrC6H4SMe
4-BrC6H4CN
4-IC6H4NO2
4-PhCOC6H4Br
2-MeCOC6H4Br
3-Cl-pyridine
2-Cl-pyridine
2-Cl-quinoline
2-Cl-pyrazine
2-Cl-pyrimidine
100
100
f
9
7
f
22
25
26
7
8
23
9
28
21
20
42
49
77
81
64
58
87
64
83
36
100
96
62
60
14
4
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
5
2
f
f
2
f
1
0
3
15
f
11
12
The effects of the solvent were studied in the reaction of
ion 1 with 2 (Table 1, entries 7-11). From the dipolar aprotic
solvents employed, DMSO gave the best results, with a
product ratio for substitution/reduction of approximately 7.
In DMF, the conversion was completed but naphthalene was
produced in an amount similar to that of ArSMe. In this
reaction, the product ratio for substitution/reduction was 1.3
due to a competitive hydrogen atom abstraction from the
1
1
1
3e
4
5
f
a
ArX, 0.05 M; 1, 0.50 M. After irradiation for 3 h under nitrogen
b
atmosphere in DMSO, the reaction was quenched with MeI. Determined
by GC using the internal standard method, error 5%. The conversion was
determined by quantification of the unreacted substrate. Together with
c
d
2
1
.5% of the methyl 2-naphthyl sulfide. Together with 1% of the methyl
-naphthyl sulfide. e Nucleophile/ArX ratio of 5:1. Not quantified.
f
10
solvent with the coupling reaction. Conversely, in the
dipolar aprotic MeCN, the yields were low because of the
lower solubility of t-BuOK. The reaction performed in liquid
ammonia showed a poor mass balance, probably due to the
obtained by the SRN1 reaction were quenched by MeI to
afford the ArSMe derivatives from moderate to good yields
11
low recovery of the naphthalene. In comparison to the
reaction carried out in DMSO, the ratio Ar S toward ArSMe
(50-83%). Nevertheless, these yields were considerably
2
better than those reported by classical substitution mecha-
nisms. For example, an alternative synthesis of 3-mercap-
topyridine by a substitution reaction of the aryl bromide with
KHS in propylene glycol required 20 h of heating at 175-
increased. This finding can be ascribed to a higher selectivity
of the naphthyl radicals toward the two competing anions
(
1 and 8) at lower temperature.12 In EtOH and HMPA, the
formation of the reduction product naphthalene notably
increased in comparison to the coupling products. These
reactions yielded a product ratio for substitution/reduction
1
90 °C and copper catalysis to produce only 14% yield of
13
the thiol.
2
-Chloropyrimidine gave modest yield of the 2-(meth-
2
of 0.1 and 0.4, respectively. In t-BuOH or H O, thiourea
ylthio)pyrimidine, and it was less reactive than 2-chloropy-
razine. A similar difference on reactivity has been previously
observed in the photoinduced reactions of both chlorides with
potassium phenylacetonitrile and ketone enolates. These
results were explained on the basis of the reduction potential
difference of the halides.
and 2 are, respectively, slightly soluble but there was no
reaction at all. In summary, DMSO is the most suitable
solvent to perform these reactions.
14
15
The reactivity of thiourea anion toward 1-bromonaphtha-
lene under irradiation has encouraged us to further explore
the potential of this anion in the synthesis of sulfur
compounds. Table 2 condenses the results obtained in the
photoinduced reactions of 1 with a variety of aryl halides.
From Table 2, it is possible to conclude that this
methodology is appropriate for substrates bearing one EWG
or heteroaryl halides, providing, thus, more reactivity in the
coupling reaction. In these cases, the arene thiolate ions
For substrates giving both the mono- and disubstitution
products (ArS and Ar
-
2
S, respectively), optimization of the
reaction conditions is possible to afford preferentially the
symmetrical diaryl sulfide by increasing the amount of the
aromatic halide or the arylthiol by increasing the amount of
thiourea. Thus, the photoinduced reaction between 1-bro-
monaphthalene (2) and 1 with a ratio 2/1 of 1:1 yielded 38%
of bis (1-naphthyl) sulfide after 3 h.
Different chemical transformations are possible for the
arene thiolate ions formed in good yields in the SRN1 reaction
without isolation, namely oxidation to the diaryl disulfide,
(
10) The following hydrogen atom abstraction rates have been determined
5
-1
5 -1
for 1-naphthyl radicals: 2.5 × 10 s (MeCN), 3 × 10 s (DMSO) and
6
-1
8
3
× 10 s (DMF). Helgee, B.; Parker, V. D. Acta Chem. Scand. 1980,
8 -1
4, 129-156. Although for DMSO a kH value of 1 × 10 s determined
by Save a´ nt (Andrieux, C. P.; Sav e´ ant, J.-M.; Su, K. B. J. Phys. Chem. 1986,
0, 3815-3823) seems to be more adequate.
11) Part of naphthalene is lost during the reaction and with the
evaporation of the solvent.
12) The absolute rate constant for the coupling reaction of aryl radicals
protonation to yield the aryl thiols, or subsequent SRN
1
9
(
(13) Wuest, H. M.; Sakal, E. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951, 73, 1210-
1216.
(
with 1 and benzene thiolate ion have been electrochemically measured in
liquid NH3. Toward 3-pyridyl radical (similar reactivity to naphthyl radical),
benzene thiolate ion is 1 order of magnitude more reactive than ion 1 (ref
(14) Hermann, C. K. F.; Sachdeva, Y. P.; Wolfe, J. F. J. Heterocycl.
Chem. 1987, 24, 1061-1065.
(15) Carver, D. R.; Komin, A. P.; Hubbard, J. S.; Wolfe, J. F. J. Org.
Chem. 1981, 46, 294-299.
7
).
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 22, 2003
4135