COMMUNICATIONS
aqueous solutionof hydrogenperoxide :30% w/w, 1.8 mmol) was added
stepwise over 1 h. At the end of the reaction, the hydrogen peroxide
concentration in the aqueous phase was determined by titration with
potassium permanganate, and the concentration of oxidation products in
the aqueous and organic phases was determined by HPLC analysis.
especially the pyrazinecarboxylic acid derivatives :en-
tries 13 ± 15), gave the best results.
The cocatalyst was selected from a series of acids, including
acetic, phosphoric, sulfuric, p-toluenesulfonic, and trifluoro-
acetic acids. The latter gave the best results and increased the
phenol selectivity :based on H2O2) from 68 :inthe absence of
any acid cocatalyst) to 78%. Conversely, complete inhibition
of the catalytic activity occurred with phosphoric acid.
With FeSO4, ligand 1, and trifluoroacetic acid, in the
selected water/acetonitrile/benzene biphasic system, under
optimized reaction conditions :a further increase in selectivity
was obtained by lowering the temperature from 50 to 358C),
we achieved a benzene conversion of 8.6% with selectivities
of 97% :based on benzene) and 88% :based on H2O2). These
values are higher thanthose reported for other iron-based
catalysts such as the Fenton [7] and Gif systems.[8] Inthe former
case, high selectivities based onH 2O2 :up to 83%) were only
obtained at low benzene conversion :<1%). Inthe latter, a
series of ironcomplexes with pyridien-2-carboxylic acid
derivatives were reported to be completely ineffective in the
oxidation of benzene under Gif reaction conditions.
Catalyst screening: FeSO4 ´ 7H2O :0.06 mmol), CF3COOH :0.06 mmol),
and one of the ligands listed in Table 1 :0.24 mmol) were dissolved in water
:8 mL), and the reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h at 258C. The resulting
solution was added to a mixture of acetonitrile :8 mL) and benzene
:1.6 mL, 18 mmol). The reactions were carried out as described for solvent
screening.
Optimized conditions for benzene oxidation: FeSO4 ´ 7H2O :0.4 mmol),
CF3COOH :0.4 mmol), and 1 :0.4 mmol) were dissolved inwater :109 mL),
and the reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h at 258C. The resulting solution
was added to a mixture of acetonitrile :109 mL) and benzene :22 mL,
248 mmol). The resulting biphasic system was stirred at 800 rpm at 358C,
and an aqueous solution of hydrogen peroxide :30% w/w, 24 mmol) was
progressively added with a peristaltic pump over 4 h. At the end of the
reaction, the concentrations of hydrogen peroxide and of the oxidation
product were measured as described above. Hydrogenperoxide adn
benzene conversions were 95 and 8.4%, respectively, with selectivities to
phenol of 88 and 97% based on hydrogen peroxide and benzene,
respectively. The molar product distributionwas: pheonl 97.1, hydro-
quinone 0.5, catechol 0.6, 1,4-benzoquinone 0.1, biphenyl 0.1, and tars
1.5 %.
It is also noteworthy that in the biphasic system, only a
negligible amount :<1%) of biphenyl was detected among
the secondary products, whereas in the classical Fenton
oxidation, this compound is formed by radical dimerization
of hydroxycyclohexadienyl radicals in a yield of 8 ± 39%.[9]
This different reactivity and selectivity was confirmed in the
oxidationof toluene. Inthe biphasic system, this reaction
afforded a mixture of hydroxylationproducts : o- and p-
cresol) and benzylic oxidation products :benzylic alcohol,
benzaldehyde, benzoic acid) in 76 and 23% overall yield,
respectively :see Experimental Section). Conversely, under
Fenton conditions, the reported product distribution was:
hydroxylation 4%, benzylic oxidation 56%, and radical
Toluene oxidation: The reaction was carried out as described above for
benzene, with water :109 mL), acetonitrile :109 mL), FeSO4 ´ 7H2O
:0.4 mmol), CF3COOH :0.4 mmol), 1 :0.4 mmol), toluene :240 mmol),
and hydrogen peroxide :30% w/w; 24 mmol). After 4 h at 508C the
hydrogen peroxide and toluene conversions were 60 and 3.1%, respec-
tively. The molar product distributionwas: o-cresol 44, p-cresol 32,
2-methyl-1,4-benzoquinone 1, benzyl alcohol 5, benzaldehyde 15, and
benzoic acid 3%.
Received: April 17, 2000
Revised: August 23, 2000 [Z15005]
[1] a) R. A. Sheldon, J. K. Kochi, Metal-Catalyzed Oxidations of Organic
Compounds, Academic Press, New York, 1981, pp. 329 ± 333; b) G.
Goor in Catalytic Oxidations with Hydrogen Peroxide as Oxidant :Ed.:
G. Strukul), Kluver, Dordrecht, 1992, pp. 29 ± 31.
[2] T. L. Poulos, J. Cupp-Vickery, H. Li in Cytochrome P-450. Structure,
Mechanism, and Biochemistry :Ed.: P. R. Ortiz de Montellano), 2nd
ed., Plenum, New York, 1995, p. 132.
[3] B. Poolman, W. N. Konings, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1993, 1183, 5 ± 39.
[4] a) C. Walling, Acc. Chem. Res. 1975, 8, 125 ± 129; b) C. Walling, Acc.
Chem. Res. 1988, 31, 155 ± 157.
[5] a) D. H. R. Barton, Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 5805 ± 5817; b) D. H. R.
Barton, F. Launay, Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 12699 ± 12706.
[6] J. A. Riddick, W. B. Bunger, T. K. Sakano in Organic Solvents :Ed.: A.
Weissemberg) 4th ed., Wiley, New York, 1986, p. 136.
[7] a) C. Walling, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 363 ± 367; b) S. Ito, A.
Mitarai, K. Hikino, M. Hirama, K. Sasaki, J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57,
6937 ± 6941.
[9]
dimerizationto bibenzyl 30%.
The catalyst system is also effective inthe oxidationof
alkanes, including a substrate as poorly reactive as methane,
which is mainly converted :708C, 5 Mpa) to formic acid :46%
based onhydrogenperoxide); inthis case, a biphasic system is
not expected to form.
In conclusion, a new iron-based homogeneous catalyst for
the oxidation of benzene to phenol with 97% selectivity was
discovered. Anattractive feature of the process is the
operationina biphasic system, with the quantitative distri-
butionof the catalyst inthe aqueous phase, that canbe
separated and reused in several consecutive cycles as a
ªworking solutionº without any appreciable loss of activity. In
the light of these promising results, the development of a
continuous process, more suitable for industrial application, is
presently under investigation.
[8] D. H. R. Barton, F. Halley, N. Ozbalik, W. Mehl, Tetrahedron Lett.
1989, 30, 6615 ± 6618.
[9] J. R. L. Smith, R. O. C. Norman, J. Chem. Soc. 1963, 2897 ± 2905.
[10] C. Venturello, R. DꢁAloisio :Montedison S.p.A.) D-EP 201934, 1986
[Chem. Abstr. 1987, 106, 67349 w].
Experimental Section
1
was synthesised according to a
literature procedure.[10] All other
chemicals :Aldrich) were used as purchased.
Solvent screening: FeSO4 ´ 7H2O :0.06 mmol) and CF3COOH :0.06 mmol)
were dissolved inwater :8 mL), and the solutionadded to a mixture of an
organic solvent :acetonitrile, propionitrile, tert-butyl alcohol, acetone,
dioxane, dimethylformamide, or n-octane; 8 mL) and benzene :1.6 mL,
18 mmol). The resulting biphasic system was stirred at 508C, and an
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, No. 23
ꢀ WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH, D-69451 Weinheim, 2000
1433-7851/00/3923-4323 $ 17.50+.50/0
4323