Macromolecules, Vol. 38, No. 19, 2005
Oxygen Permeable New Polyimides 7951
Thermogravimetric analyzer. The sample was heated using a
20 °C/min heating rate from 50 to 800 °C. Differential scanning
calorimetry (DSC) was conducted under nitrogen with TA
instruments 2100 differential scanning calorimeter. The sample
was heated at 20 °C/min from 30 °C to 400 °C. Inherent
viscosities were measured with a Cannon Fenske viscometer
in DMAc solution (0.5 g/dL, 25 °C). Tensile properties were
determined from stress-strain curves obtained with a uni-
versal testing machine (UTM) (LR-10K, Lloyd Instrument
Ltd.) with a load cell of 10 kgf. A gauge of 2 cm and a strain
rate of 0.5 cm/min were used for this study. Measurements
were performed at room temperature with film specimens (1
cm wide, 5 cm long, and 30-80 µm thick). Gas permeabilities
for the polymer membrane with about 30-60 µm of thickness
were measured with a conventional permeability apparatus,
which consists of upstream and downstream parts separated
by a membrane.26-28 The upstream part was maintained to a
constant pressure of 3 kgf/cm2 of either pure O2 or N2 gas
during the experimental period, and the downstream part was
opened to the atmosphere. A bubble gas flow meter was
employed to measure the steady-state permeation flux from
which the gas permeability was calculated.
chloroform as an eluent). Yield: 6 g (50%). Mp: 333 °C. FT-
IR (KBr pellet, cm-1): 3048 (aromatic C-H), 2961 (aliphatic
C-H), 1724 (CdO stretching), 1383 (C-N stretching), 1H NMR
(500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.05 (s, 2H), 7.85-7.87 (m, 4H, Ar-H),
7.69-7.73 (m, 6H, Ar-H), 7.52 (d, 2H, Ar-H), 7.42 (d, 2H,
Ar-H), 6.82-6.86 (d of d, 4H, Ar-H), 1.24 (s, 18H, tert-butyl)
2,7-Bis(diamino-2′,7′-di-tert-butyl-9,9′-spirobifluo-
rene) (DADBSBF). A 5 g (6.7 mmol) sample of 2′,7′-di-tert-
butyl-2,7-bis(N-phthalimido)-9,9′-spirobifluorene and 1.68 g
(0.034 mmol) of hydrazine monohydrate was dissolved in 40
mL of THF. The mixture was refluxed for 5 h. After the
solution was cooled to room temperature, the crude product
was filtered. The product was recrystallized in absolute ethanol
and ethyl ether (1:1). Yield: 2.5 g (80%). Mp; 276 °C. FT-IR
(KBr pellet, cm-1): 3353 (NH2), 3032 (aromatic C-H), 2957
(aliphatic C-H), 1362 (tert-butyl CH3), 1H NMR (500 MHz,
CDCl3): δ 7.71 (s, 2H, Ar-H), 7.51 (s, 2H, Ar-H), 7.40 (d, 2H,
Ar-H), 6.76 (d, 2H, Ar-H), 6.64 (d, 2H, Ar-H), 6.03 (d, 2H,
Ar-H), 3.44 (s, 4H, NH2), 1.21 (s, 18H, tert-butyl).
Polymerization. Polymerization procedures were as fol-
lows. The obtained diamine (1 mmol) was dissolved in 25 mL
of m-cresol. After the diamine was dissolved completely, 1
mmol of corresponding dianhydride was added. The mixture
was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The temperature of
the mixture was gradually elevated to 200 °C and then stirred
for 5 h. An excess m-cresol was added to the mixture, and the
mixture was cooled. The obtained polymer was precipitated
in methanol. The precipitation procedure was carried out
several times. Yield: 96-98%
Preparation of Dense Film. A 5-7 wt % solution of
polymer in chloroform was prepared and filtered through a
0.2 µm syringe filter to remove the non dissolved materials
and dust particles. The solution was then poured into a casting
ring on a leveled clean glass plate. The casting ring was
covered with a piece of filter paper. The casting process took
about 8 h at room temperature. The casting films were dried
in an oven at 40 °C for 6 h without vacuum and for another 6
h with vacuum, and the resulting films samples were dried at
80 °C for 6 h and then at 100 °C for 10 h. Dense films were
obtained by annealing at 150 °C in a vacuum oven for an
additional 24 h before the gas permeability measurement.
Monomer Synthesis. 4,4′-Di-tert-butylbiphenyl (DBBP).
A 1L three-neck round flask was equipped with dropping
funnel, magnetic stirring bar, drying tube, and thermometer.
Biphenyl (50 g, 0.32 mol) and 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methyl phenol
(93 g, 0.422 mol) were dissolved in nitromethane. The reaction
mixture was stirred at 15 °C for 30 min. After AlCl3 (74.3 g,
0.557 mol) was dissolved in nitromethane, it was dropped into
the reaction mixture. After the reaction mixture was poured
into the iced water, the crude product was extracted with
hexane. The solvent was evaporated, and product was recrys-
tallized from ethanol; yield after recrystallization: 69 g (80%).
Mp: 128-130 °C. FT-IR (KBr pellet, cm-1): 3028 (aromatic
1
C-H), 2955 cm-1 (aliphatic C-H), 1361 (tert-butyl CH3), H
NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.48-7.58 (dd. 8H. Ar-H), 1.41
(s, 18H, tert-butyl).
2-Bromo-4,4′-di-tert-butylbiphenyl (BDBBP). 4,4′-Di-
tert-butylbiphenyl (40 g, 0.177 mol) was dissolved in methylene
dichloride. After FeCl3 (0.4 g, 2.5 mmol) was added to the
solution at 5-8 °C, then Br2 (33.9 g, 2.1 mol) was added to
the mixture. The reaction was terminated by addition of 1 M
aqueous NaOH after the mixture was stirred for 3 h. The
solvent was evaporated, and the residue was recrystallized
from ethanol; yield after recrystallization: 49 g (90%). Mp:
87-89 °C. FT-IR (KBr pellet, cm-1): 3032 (aromatic C-H),
2998 (aliphatic C-H), 1361 (tert-butyl CH3), 1350 (aromatic
C-Br). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.29-7.70 (m, 7H, Ar-
H), 1.39-1.41 (d, 18H, tert-butyl).
2,7-Dibromo-2′,7′-di-tert-butyl-9,9′-spirobifluorene
(DBBSBF): A 1.5 g (61.7 mmol) sample of magnesium and
16 g (46.3 mmol) of 2-bromo-4,4′-di-tert-butylbiphenyl were
reacted to give 2-bromo-4,4′-di-tert-butylbiphenyl-2-magnesium
bromide in diethyl ether. After refluxing for 2 h, the ether
solution of 10.74 g (32.7 mmol) of 2,7-dibromofluorenone was
added to the mixture. The reaction mixture was refluxed for
12 h. After acetic acid was added to the reaction mixture, the
reaction was terminated and solvent was evaporated. After
the solid residue was dissolved in acetic acid, 1-2 drops of
HCl was added and the mixture was heated to refluxed. The
crude product was filtered and washed with hexane and
ethanol. Yield: 7 g (40%). Mp: 281-282 °C. FT-IR (KBr pellet,
cm-1): 3048 (aromatic C-H), 2958 (aliphatic C-H), 1361 (tert-
butyl CH3), 1350 (aromatic C-Br). 1H NMR (500 MHz,
CDCl3): δ 7.74 (s, 2H, Ar-H), 7.71 (s, 2H, Ar-H), 7.52-7.53
(d, 2H, Ar-H), 7.44-7.47 (d, 2H, Ar-H), 6.89 (d, 2H, Ar-H),
6.68 (d, 2H, Ar-H), 1.22 (s, 18H, tert-butyl)
Results and Discussion
The novel spirobifluorene diamine monomer 2,7-bis-
amino-2′,7′-di-tert-butyl-9,9′-spirobifluorene was ob-
tained by hydrolysis of 2′,7′-di-tert-butyl-2,7-bis(4′′-N-
phthalimido)-9,9′-spirobifluorene (as shown in Scheme
1). The precursor, 2,7-dibromo-2′,7′-di-tert-butyl-9,9′-
spirobifluorene, was prepared by reacting 2,7-dibromof-
luorenone with the Grignard reagent prepared from
2-bromo-4,4′-di-tert-butylbiphenyl followed by dehydra-
tive ring closure of the resulting carbinol in acetic acid.
The aromatic nucleophilic substitution of 2,7-dibromo-
2′,7′-di-tert-butyl-9,9′-spirobifluorene with phthalimide
gave 2′,7′-di-tert-butyl-2,7-bis(N-phthalimido)-9,9′-spiro-
bifluorene, which on subsequently hydrolysis using
hydrazine afforded the desired monomer diamine. The
yields in each steps were high. The structures of the
obtained compounds in each steps were verified by
spectroscopic techniques. The structure of obtained
1
monomer, DADBSBF, was also confirmed by H NMR
1
and IR and elemental analysis. In the H NMR, the
proton peaks of tert-butyl, amine, and aromatic ring
hydrogens appeared at 1.21, 3.44, and 6.03-7.71 ppm,
respectively. In the FT-IR spectrum, instead of the
carbonyl group of BPISBF, characteristic peaks of the
2′,7′-Di-tert-butyl-2,7-bis(N-phthalimido)-9,9′-spirobi-
fluorene (BPISBF). A mixture of 10 g (0.017 mol) of 2′,7′-
dibromo-2,7-di-tert-butyl-9,9′-spirobifluorene, 9.5 g (0.051 mol)
of potassium phthalimide, and 14.66 g (0.077 mol) of CuI, and
60 mL of DMF was stirred in. The mixture was heated to
refluxed for 12 h. After the reaction mixture was cooled to room
temperature, it was extracted with chloroform. The product
was purified by column chromatography (silicagel. With
amine group appeared at 3353 and 3470 cm-1
.
For the synthesis of polyimides, one-step polymeri-
zation was employed (Scheme 2). The one-step polym-
erization provides some advantages over the conven-