groups, with partial recovery of the surface OHs shown by the
increase of the shoulder at 2100 ppm. This behaviour is also
seen in the IR spectra of the samples, since in the silylated
catalysts there is a large decrease in the band corresponding to
Si–OH vibrations (3000–3750 cm21), which is partly recovered
after calcination.
The catalytic activities of these samples and the materials
used as reference were tested in the epoxidation of styrene with
TBHP. Besides the conversion of styrene and TBHP, Table 2
shows the turnover numbers (TON), relative to the total amount
of Ti in the catalyst, and the selectivity of styrene towards the
different products for the different catalysts, including a blank
test. Different products were obtained besides the primary
product, styrene oxide (SO): benzaldehyde (BADH) formed
from oxidative cleavage of styrene by TBHP and 2-phenyl-
2-tert-butoxyethanol (22ET) formed from nucleophilic attack
of ButOH on oxirane ring of the primary product.
The Ti-containing silica xerogels prepared without the use of
the silylation procedure (samples 1 and 4) show similar TON to
that of the TiO2 impregnated silica xerogel, although the
selectivity towards SO is higher for the latter. Silylated samples
show very high selectivity towards the epoxide with negligible
formation of the product coming from the opening of the
oxirane ring. The reuse of the silylated sample 5 shows a slight
decrease in styrene conversion (XST = 14.2%) without any
change in selectivity (SSO = 98.5%). Once the silylated samples
are calcined a decrease in SO selectivity is observed due to the
regeneration of HO groups on the sample surface, which
promotes the catalytic reaction of the epoxide with ButOH
formed from TBHP. The pore volume of the Ti-containing silica
is an important factor in the preparation of these catalysts, since
for comparable BET surface areas (samples 2 and 5, for
example), the higher the pore volume the thinner the pore walls;
therefore there is a higher probability of the Ti atoms being
located at the surface. Although at first sight the silylation
procedure could lead to the complete blocking of Ti atoms at the
catalyst surface, hindering their oxidation activity, not all this
surface is covered by the silylating agent, as was proved by the
catalytic activity of the silylated samples.
Fig. 1 Pore volume distribution (BJH analysis of the adsorption branch of
the isotherm) of (a) 4 (xerogel), (b) 5 (silylated) and (c) 6 (silylated and
calcined). Inset: 29Si MAS NMR spectra of these samples are shown.
the gel, which prevents irreversible shrinkage during drying.
There is a remarkable increase in the BET surface area, pore
volume and mean pore size in the samples prepared with EtOH.
It is interesting to note how the silylation procedure is capable
of preserving at least partially the different gel structures
derived from the use of increasing amounts of EtOH as solvent,
something that is not shown in the textural properties of the
xerogels when conventional drying is used (samples 1 and 4).
Similarly, after calcination, the differences are clearly shown
not only in comparison to the xerogels but also between the
materials prepared with different dilution levels, i.e. EtOH
content. The calcination of the silylated samples leads to a
decrease mainly in the pore volume of the samples compared
with the uncalcined ones, showing some evidence of pore
collapse. In any case, the pore volumes are clearly higher than
those corresponding to xerogels and are in accordance with the
textural properties of the starting non-calcined silylated sam-
ples. The used samples, after reaction, showed similar textural
properties to the fresh ones.
The method reported in this work is an easy and reproducible
way to obtain a highly hydrophobic Ti-containing material with
aerogel properties, oxidation activity comparable to Ti-HMS
and higher selectivity towards epoxide formation, without the
use of templates or surfactants as in the case of zeolites or
micelle structured zeolitic materials.
We are grateful to Dr Tuel (CNRS) for supplying Ti-HMS,
CEPSA for the X-ray fluorescence measurements. This work
was supported by the EU through the Brite-Euram Project (No.
Br.-1169).
Fig. 1 shows the pore size distribution coming from BJH
analysis of the N2 isotherms of samples 4–6. There is a shift in
the pore size distribution towards higher values when the
silylation procedure is used, with a decrease in the size of the
largest pores after calcination. The 29Si MAS NMR spectra of
4–6 are shown in Fig. 1 (inset), recorded in a Varian 300 MHz
with a spinning rate of 4 kHz. It is clearly shown how the
silylation procedure decreases the large Q3 contribution at
2100 ppm in the non-silylated sample, showing up as a peak 15
ppm upfield corresponding to trimethylsilyl groups (TMS)
formed in the reaction of TMSCl with the silanol groups of the
gel surface.14 The calcination procedure removes the TMS
Notes and references
1 K. A. Jorgensen, Chem. Rev., 1989, 89, 431.
2 R. C. Ragers, Br. Pat. 1 249 079, 1971.
Table 2 Activity of the different titanium-containing materials in the
epoxidation of styrenea
Conversion (%)
Selectivity (%)
3 M. Taramasso, G. Perego and B. Notari, US Pat. 4 410 501, 1983.
4 B. Notari, Catal. Today, 1993, 18, 163.
5 A. Camblor, A. Corma, A. Martinez and J. Pe´rez-Pariente, J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun., 1992, 583.
6 T. Tanev, M. Chibwe and T. J. Pinnavaia, Nature, 1994, 368, 321.
7 M. Fraile, J. I. Garc´ıa, J. A. Mayoral, L. C. De Me`norval and F. Rachdi,
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1995, 539.
8 M. Schneider and A. Baiker, Catal. Today, 1997, 35, 339.
9 S. Klein, J. A. Martens, R. Parton, K. Vercruysse, P. A. Jacobs and W. F.
Maier, Catal. Lett., 1996, 38, 209.
10 M. A. Uguina, G. Ovejero, R. Van Grieken, D. P. Serrano and M.
Camacho, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1994, 27.
11 G. M. Pajonk, Catal. Today, 1997, 35, 319.
12 S. Sai, C. Prakash, J. Brinker, A. J. Hurd Sudeep and M. Rao, Nature,
1995, 374, 439.
13 S. Gonier and A. Tuel, Zeolites, 1995, 15, 601.
14 H. Yokogawa and M. Yokoyama, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 1995, 186,
23.
Sample
Blank
TBHP
3.9
ST
0.6
TONb
BADH
SO
22ET
—
35
77
35
50
48
37
63
66
13.6
1.4
1.0
1.4
1.9
1.1
1.4
1.4
1.2
86.4
81.5
88.3
59.9
98.1
83.9
65.7
98.6
87.8
0.0
17.1
10.7
38.7
0.0
15.0
32.9
0.0
Impregnated 30.2
9.8
16.2
15.0
12.9
13.0
15.9
16.1
17.6
Ti-HMS
45.0
39.7
35.3
35.6
41.8
45.4
41.6
1
2
3
4
5
6
a
11.0
Reaction conditions: T = 60 °C, t = 3 h, autogenous pressure, no
solvent, stirring speed = 300 rpm, inert atmosphere, catalyst loading = 400
mg, styrene = 100 mmol, TBHP = 40 mmol; ST = styrene; TBHP = tert-
butyl hydroperoxide; SO = styrene oxide; BADH = benzaldehyde; 22ET
= 2-phenyl-2-tert-butoxyethanol. b In moles of styrene per mole of titanium
per hour.
Communication 8/09012B
550
Chem. Commun., 1999, 549–550