Inorganic Chemistry
Article
EDGs on the bpm ligand affected the photophysical properties
of the trinuclear catalysts, as clearly observed on the UV−vis
spectroscopic data. Moreover, the EWGs or EDGs on the bpm
evaporation of the solvent, [CoCl(NH
3
)
5
]Cl
2
(15 mg, 60 μmol) and 3
mL of 0.067 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) were added. The
resulting solution was degassed by the freeze−pump−thaw method,
and the organic substrate (30 μmol) was then added under a N
2
ligands clearly shifted the redox potentials of Ru , Ruphoto,
cat
atmosphere. The system was sealed, kept in a water bath at 35 °C, and
then exposed to the light produced by a 150 W Xe lamp through a cut
filter (λ > 420 nm). The solution was stirred during the reaction. The
pybpm, and bpm, owing to the electronic effects of the
substituents. On the one hand, in the case of EWGs, the redox
waves in the CVs were shifted to higher potentials owing to the
electron-deficient Ru center. On the other hand, the EDGs
shifted the redox waves to lower potentials. These results
corresponded well with the theoretical data.
The highest activity for photocatalytic oxygenation of
thioanisole was observed for the trinuclear catalyst with
EWGs, and the same trend was found for the reactions of
terminal alkenes (styrene and α-methylstyrene). However, this
catalyst showed lower catalytic activity for the reactions of
internal alkenes (cis-stilbene and cis-2-decene), likely owing to
the steric effects resulting from incorporation of substrates onto
the catalyst reaction center.
Quantum yield measurements for the photocatalytic oxygen-
ation of thioanisole indicated that the trinuclear catalyst with
EWG substituents on the bpm ligand had the highest quantum
yield of ∼20%. In contrast, the lower quantum yield of the
trinuclear catalyst with EDG substituents was comparable to
that of the dinuclear catalyst. Furthermore, the trinuclear
complexes had much higher quantum yields than the
corresponding mononuclear catalysts.
1
reaction was followed by H NMR and GC-MS at appropriate time
intervals.
Computational Details. DFT calculations were performed using
16
the Gaussian-16 Revision A.03 quantum chemistry program package
1
7,18
at the B3LYP/LanL2DZ level.
We used the LanL2DZ
1
9
pseudopotential for Ru, 6-31G(d) split-valence basis set for N and
2
0
Cl, and 3-21G for C and H. The orbital energies were determined by
using minimized singlet geometries to approximate the ground state.
Synthesis of [(bpy) Ru(pybpm)RuCl ]Cl (2). A mixture of
2
2
2
[
Ru(cod)Cl ] (0.073 g, 0.259 mmol) and LiCl (0.061 g, 1.448 mmol)
2 n
was stirred in degassed 2-methoxyethanol until all the LiCl was
dissolved. Then, Ru complex 1 ([(bpy) Ru(pybpm)] , 0.101 g, 0.123
mmol) was added, and the solution was refluxed at 150 °C under N2
for 30 min. A dark brown powder was precipitated by adding Et O.
2+
2
2
The obtained solid was dissolved in CH
NO , and the remaining salt
3
2
was washed with H O/CH NO and dried over Na SO . Subsequent
2
3
2
2
4
recrystallization from CH NO /Et O yielded dinuclear [(bpy) Ru-
3
2
2
2
(
pybpm)RuCl ]Cl (2) in 87.2% yield (0.096 g, 0.108 mmol). Two
2 2
2
+
isomers were obtained owing to Δ- and Λ-[Ru(bpy)(pybpm)] units,
1
1
the H NMR spectra showed (Figure S1a). H NMR (500 MHz,
CD NO , rt, δ/ppm): 9.53−9.52 (two doublets representing two
3
2
isomers, 1 H), 9.42−9.40 (two doublets representing two isomers, 1
H), 8.61−8.58 (m, 5 H), 8.31−8.30 (2 S, 1 H), 8.17−8.08 (m, 7H),
8.04−8.00 (m, 3 H), 7.82−7.79 (2 t, 2 H), 7.74−7.73 (1 d, 1 H),
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
■
1
4
General Method. The metal complexes, [Ru(cod)Cl ] , cis(Cl)-
2
n
1
5
2+ 10
+
fac(S)-RuCl (dmso) , [(bpy) Ru(bpm)] , cis-Ru(bpy) Cl ·
7.49−7.47 (4 t, 4 H). ESI-MS (m/z): 855.9 [M-Cl] (calcd: 856.12).
2
4
2
2
2
10
4c
Me 2+ 6b
2
H O, [(bpy) Ru(pybpm)](BF ) (1), [(bpy) Ru(bpm )] ,
Anal. Calcd for C33H25Cl N Ru ·0.5CH NO ·3H O: C, 41.22; H,
4 9 2 3 2 2
2
2
4
2
2
Br 2+ 6b
and [(bpy) Ru(bpm )] , were prepared according to the published
3.36; N, 13.63. Found: C, 41.24; H, 3.31; N, 13.66%.
Synthesis of [(bpy)
Ru(pybpm)RuCl(bpmMe)Ru(bpy)
(3 -Cl). A mixture of 2 (0.035 g, 0.040 mmol) and [(bpy)
2
2
1
procedures. H NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE-
2
2
](BF
Ru-
(bpm )](BF ) (0.032 g, 0.042 mmol) were refluxed with LiCl
4 2
)
4 5
Me
5
00, JEOL ECS-400, and JEOL EX-270 spectrometers. NMR solvents
Me
were dried over molecular sieves, degassed, and stored under N . ESI
2
mass spectra were recorded on a Bruker MicroTOF II mass
spectrometer. Elemental analysis was performed using a CE-440
elemental analyzer (Exeter Analytical, Inc.).
(0.015 g, 0.342 mmol) in distilled EtOH (7 mL) for 12 h. After it
cooled to room temperature, the dark brown solution was vigorously
stirred with a solution of NH
BF in EtOH (0.05M, 30 mL) to
4
4
Me
Physical Measurements. UV−vis absorption spectra were
recorded on a JASCO V-670 spectrometer for DMF solutions in
quartz cells with a path length of 10 mm. CVs and DPVs were
recorded for 1 mM of each Ru complex in acetonitrile using an
electrochemical analyzer (model 620B, CH Instruments, Inc.) with a
precipitate trinuclear Ru complex 3 -Cl ([(bpy)
2
Ru(pybpm)RuCl-
) as a brown solid. Excess salt was removed
by diatomaceous earth filtration. The obtained brown solid was
recrystallized from CH NO /Et O three times to yield 81.2% (0.058 g,
0.032 mmol). Characteristic peaks in the H NMR spectrum indicated
Me
(bpm )Ru(bpy) ](BF )
2 4 5
3
2
2
1
+
1
glassy carbon working electrode (diameter 1.0 mm), a Ag/Ag
the presence of 16 isomers H NMR (500 MHz, CD NO , rt, δ/ppm):
3 2
reference electrode (0.01 M AgNO , 0.1 M tetrabutylammonium
perchlorate in electrolyte solution), and a Pt wire counter electrode.
9.99−9.90 (16 s representing 16 isomers, 1 H), 8.93−8.39 (m, 14 H),
8.31−8.11 (m, 10 H), 8.10−7.86 (m, 6 H), 7.85−7.63 (m, 5 H), 7.61−
7.37 (m, 9 H), 2.60−2.56 (4 s representing 16 isomers, 3 H), 1.90−
1.79 (4 s representing 16 isomers, 3 H). ESI-MS (m/z): 1731.88 [M −
3
Acetonitrile was degassed by N bubbling for 30 min. The solution of
2
n
0
.1 M tetrabutylammonium tetrafluoroborate ( Bu NBF ) in degassed
4
4
+
acetonitrile was prepared in a Schlenk cell. Measurements were
BF ] (calcd: 1732.09). Anal. Calcd for C H B ClF N Ru ·
4
63 51
5
20 17
3
performed under an inert gas flow (Ar + N ) to prevent contamination
CH NO : C, 40.89; H, 2.90; N, 13.41. Found: C, 40.72; H, 2.93; N,
2
3
2
by oxygen. A scan rate of 100 mV/s was selected. After each
13.12%.
Me
measurement, ferrocene was added to the solution as an internal
Synthesis of [(bpy) Ru(pybpm)RuOH (bpm )Ru(bpy) ]-
2
2
2
+
Me
Me
standard (E(Fc/Fc ) = 0 V vs normal hydrogen electrode (NHE)).
(BF
AgBF
4
)
6
(3 -OH
(0.015 g, 0.079 mmol) were refluxed in H
2
2
). A mixture of 3 -Cl (0.048 g, 0.026 mmol) and
Quantum Yield Measurements. A reaction solution containing
Ru catalyst (20 μM) in 5 mL of phosphate-buffered water (0.067 M,
pH 6.8) with thioanisole (10 mM) and [Co(NH ) Cl]Cl (20 mM) as
4
O (5 mL) for 4 h.
After it cooled to room temperature, the solvent (water) was removed
under reduced pressure, and then the obtained solid was dissolved in
3
5
2
a sacrificial electron acceptor was prepared. Before light irradiation, the
solution was degassed by the freeze−pump−thaw method in a 20 mL
transparent Schlenk tube. Monochromatic light-emitting diode (LED)
light (λ = 435 nm) was used as the light source through an optical lens
to maintain the incident light intensity. The number of photons
absorbed by the solution was calculated by using a light power meter
CH
NO
3
2
. After diatomaceous earth filtration to remove AgCl salt, the
NO /Et O to
Ru(pybpm)-
as a dark-brown solid (0.049 g,
0.026 mmol, 97.9% yield). H NMR (500 MHz, CD NO , rt, δ/ppm):
filtrate was concentrated and recrystallized from CH
3
2
2
Me
yield trinuclear aqua complex 3 -OH , [(bpy)
2 2
Me
RuOH (bpm )Ru(bpy) ](BF )
2 2 4 6
1
3
2
9.84−9.74 (16 s representing 16 isomers, 1 H), 8.78−8.30 (m, 16 H),
8.28−7.86 (m, 15 H), 7.82−7.35 (m, 13 H), 2.63−2.58 (4 s
representing 16 isomers, 3 H), 1.92−1.79 (4 s representing 16 isomers,
(
StarLite, OPHIR Photonics Solutions, Ltd.) at λ = 435 nm. The slope
of the plot of the product formed (methyl phenyl sulfoxide product,
mmol) versus number of photons (mmol) gave the quantum yield.
General Photocatalytic Reactions. A 0.1 mM solution of the
catalyst in CH NO (0.6 mL) was added to the Schlenk tube. After
2
+
3 H). ESI-MS (m/z): 1715.01 [M − 2BF ] (calcd: 1714.66). Anal.
4
Calcd for C H B F N ORu ·3.5H O·CH NO : C, 38.20; H, 3.16;
6
3
53
6
24 17
3
2
3
2
N, 12.53. Found: C, 37.82; H, 2.77; N, 12.21%.
3
2
I
Inorg. Chem. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX