1328
LI-YUN ZHU et al.
Table 2. Comparison of oxidation of benzaldehyde oxime to benzaldehyde with potassium permanganate under different reaction
conditions
Molar ratio substrate
Reaction Yield,
Entry
Supports
Reaction conditions
to potassium
References
time
%
permanganate
1
2
Graphite
Solvent-free/RT/grind
Solvent-free/RT/grind
1 : 1.2
1 : 1.2
5 min
5 min
94
92
Present work
17
Kieselguhr
Montmorillonite
K-10
3
Solvent-free/RT/grind
Solvent-free/50OC/grind
CH Cl /RT
1 : 2
1 : 1.4
1 : 2
5 min
40 min
20 min
1 h
85
78
86
92
10
11
16
18
4
5
6
Alumina
Kieselguhr
Silica gel
2
2
CH Cl /RT
1 : 2
2
2
listed in Table 2. By comparing the current procedure
with the most of others (Table 2), the amount of potas-
sium permanganate used is decreased, the reactions are
milder, or the time of the oxidation is shorter. Therefore,
the advantages of the present route are over most of
those of previous potassium permanganate oxidation
methods.
5. Sandler, S.R. and Karo, W., Organic Functional Group
Preparations, vol. 3, 2nd Ed., San Diego:Academic Press,
1989.
6
. Haines, H., Methods for The Oxidation of Organic
Compounds, Alcohols, Alcohol Derivatives, Alkyl
Halides, Nitroalkanes, Alkyl Azides, Carbonyl Compounds,
Hydroxyarenes And Aminoarenes, Academic Press:
London, 1988
CONCLUSIONS
7. Sahu, S., Sahu, S., Patel, S., Dash, S., and Mishra, B.K.,
Indian J. Chem., 2008, vol. 47B, p. 259.
Afacile and efficient procedure for oxidative cleavage
of oximes to their parent aldehydes and ketones by
grinding with potassium permanganate-graphite at room
temperature under solvent-free conditions in the yields
between 80 and 94% is described. All reactions are
complete in 5 min. The main advantages of the present
oxidation are of enhanced selectivity and reactivity,
mild reaction conditions, and straightforward work-up
procedure.
8
9
. Shaabani, A., Naderi, S., Rahmati, A., Badri, Z.,
Darvishi, M., and Lee, D.G., Synthesis, 2005, p. 3023.
. Hajipour, A.R. and Ruoho, A.E., J. Iranian Chem. Soc.,
2
004, vol. 1, p. 159.
1
0. Mohammadpoor-baltork, I., Khodaei, M.M., Hajipour,A.R.,
and Aslani, E.A., Monatsh Chem., 2003, vol. 134, p. 539.
1
1. Imanzadeh, G.H., Hajipour, A.R., and Mallakpour, S.E.,
Synth. Commun., 2003, vol. 33, p. 735.
1
1
1
1
1
1
2. Chrisman, W., Blankinship, M.J., Taylor, B., and
Harris, C.E., Tetrahedron Lett., 2001, vol. 42, p. 4775.
REFERENCES
3. Jadhav, V.K., Wadgaonkar, P.P., Joshi, P.L., and
1
. Wuts, P.G.M. and Greene, T.W., Greene’s Protective
Groups In Organic Synthesis, 4th Edition, Wiley, New
York, 2006.
Salunkhe, M.M., Synth. Commun., 1999, vol. 29, p. 1989.
4. Zhou, Y.F., Lin, F., Lu, X.L., Zhang, C., Wang, Q., Zou, X.,
and Lou, J.D., Oxid. Commun., 2012, vol. 35, p. 72.
2
3
4
. Solomons, T.W.G., Fryhle, C.B., and Snyder, S.A., Organic
Chemistry, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
5. Zhu, L., Huang, C., Shi, C., Lin, F., Zhang, C., and
Lou, J.D., Oxid Commun., 2012, vol. 35, p. 389.
. Sandle, S.R. and Karo, R.W., Organic Functional Group
Preparations, San Diego: Academic Press, 1989.
6. Lou, J.D., Lin, F., Huang, L., and Zou, L.X., Synth. React.
Inorg. Me, 2012, vol. 42, p. 1027.
. Smith, M.B., March’s Advanced Organic Chemistry:
Reactions, Mechanisms, and Structure, New York: John
Wiley & Sons, 2013.
7. Zhu, L., Lou, Z., Lin, J., Zheng, W., Zhang, C., Lou, J.D.,
Res. Chem. Intermediat., 2013, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 4315–
4320.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED CHEMISTRY Vol. 90 No. 8 2017