presence of 1 3 13C (observed at 1677). Remarkably, oligomers of
confirm whether backbiting is indeed involved and, if so, develop
methods to minimise it. These results may provide a rationale for
the relatively low MWs (ca. 10 g mol by GPC) and isolated
yields (ca. 30–40%) thus far obtained for polymer 2 and related
polymers12 prepared using anionic initiators.
+
21
up to 11 repeat units [(311+H) , 3669 Da; calcd., 3669 g mol
]
4
21
were observed where the most intense ion was due to the presence
13
of 2 3 C in the oligomer. The observation of ions consistent with
the presence of CH and H end-groups in 3 suggests that linear
3
n
products are obtained and that the mechanism of chain growth is
analogous to that for olefins. Confirmation of this postulate was
obtained by varying the initiating species. Specifically, we have
initiated oligomerisation of 1 with BuLi (0.5 equiv.) and quenched
We are grateful to the Natural Sciences and Engineering
Research Council (NSERC) of Canada for financial support of this
work. We also thank Dr. Yun Ling and Marshall Lapawa for
assistance with the MALDI-TOF MS.
2
with H O. The MALDI-TOF mass spectra of the oligomers were
consistent with linear species containing Bu and H end-groups,
respectively. Oligomers with up to 6 repeat units were observed.
One puzzling feature of the MALDI-TOF mass spectra,
regardless of whether MeLi or BuLi is used, is the unexpected
presence of a second series of oligomers spaced by the monomer
unit (332 Da). This second series can clearly be seen in Fig. 1.
Remarkably, each peak in this series is situated exactly halfway (i.e.
Notes and references
1 For recent reviews dealing with the phosphaalkenes, see: F. Mathey,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 1578; K. B. Dillon, F. Mathey and J.
F. Nixon, Phosphorus: The Carbon Copy; Wiley: New York, 1998; M.
Yoshifuji, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1998, 3343.
2
C.-W. Tsang, M. Yam and D. P. Gates, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125,
480.
1
±
n
166 Da) between the ions assigned to the linear oligomers (3 ).
3
For reviews of inorganic polymers see: I. Manners, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl., 1996, 35, 1602; H. R. Allcock, Adv. Mater., 1994, 6, 106; J.
E. Mark, H. R. Allcock and R. West, Inorganic Polymers, Prentice Hall,
New Jersey, 1992; H. R. Allcock, Chemistry and Applications of
Polyphosphazenes, Wiley: Hoboken, New Jersey, 2003; D. P. Gates,
Annu. Rep. Prog. Chem., Sect. A, 2003, 99, 453.
This observation suggested multiply charged species. However,
after close inspection of the mass spectra this hypothesis was ruled
9
out since the ions were spaced by integer mass units. After further
consideration, we assigned these signals to linear oligomers with an
extra phosphorus group at the end of the chain (4
shows signals consistent with 4 with calculated mass of 1842 Da.
Structures with an extra CR and P–Me end-group are unlikely
since a CPh –CPh backbone linkage would be necessary to
n
). Fig. 1, inset B,
4
For recent work on phosphorus polymers, see: C. A. Jaska, A. J. Lough
and I. Manners, Inorg. Chem., 2004, 43, 1090; R. C. Smith and J. D.
Protasiewicz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 2268; V. A. Wright and D.
P. Gates, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 2389; C. H. Walker, J. V. St.
John and P. Wisian-Neilson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 3846; H. R.
Allcock and R. Prange, Macromolecules, 2001, 34, 6858; H. Dorn, R. A.
Singh, J. A. Massey, J. M. Nelson, C. A. Jaska, A. J. Lough and I.
Manners, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 6669; V. Maraval, R. Laurent,
B. Donnadieu, M. Mauzac, A.-M. Caminade and J.-P. Majoral, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 2499; V. Chunechom, T. E. Vidal, H. Adams
and M. L. Turner, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 1928.
5
2
2
2
account for the observed masses.
The reason for this second series of oligomers, is not obvious. It
is possible that these species simply result from fragmentation of
n
3 , however, this is relatively uncommon in polymer MALDI-TOF
7
,10
mass spectrometry.
Although if the P–C chains are easily
could be accounted for. However,
fragmented during ionisation, 4
n
if fragmentation during ionisation is facile, we should see
oligomeric fragments in attempted MALDI analysis of polymer 2.
Under analogous MALDI conditions we have not observed any
5
6
For examples of diphosphetaines, see: A. Mack, U. Bergsträber, G. J.
Reib and M. Regitz, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 1999, 3, 587; M. Schmitz, S.
Leininger, U. Bergsträber and M. Regitz, Heteroat. Chem., 1998, 9,
3
4
mass spectra for the polymer 2 (GPC M = 5 3 10 – 1 3 10 g
n
4
53.
2
1
mol ). In addition, oxidised 2 is thermally stable up to 320 °C as
determined by TGA which seems to suggest a stable backbone not
likely to fragment easily. Therefore, although we cannot rule out
A fascinating oligomerisation chemistry exists for phosphaalkynes. See,
for example: T. Wettling, J. Schneider, O. Wagner, C. G. Kreiter and M.
Regitz, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1989, 28, 1013; R. Bartsch, P. B.
Hitchcock and J. F. Nixon, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1989, 1046;
V. Caliman, P. B. Hitchcock, J. F. Nixon, M. Hofmann and P. v. R.
Schleyer, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1994, 33, 2202; F. Tabellion, A.
Nachbauer, S. Leininger, C. Peters, F. Preuss and M. Regitz, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 1233; A. M. Arif, A. R. Barron, A. H. Cowley
and S. W. Hall, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1988, 171; D. A. Loy,
G. M. Jamison, M. D. McClain and T. M. Alam, J. Polym. Sci. (A),
n n
fragmentation of 3 as a source of 4 , it is unlikely. If these are not
fragments, these observations may have important implications on
the proposed mechanism of anionic polymerization of 1. This will
now briefly be elaborated upon.
1
999, 37, 129.
S. F. Macha and P. A. Limbach, Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci.,
002, 6, 213; M. J. Stump, R. C. Fleming, W.-H. Gong, A. J. Jaber, J.
J. Jones, C. W. Surber and C. L. Wilkins, Appl. Spectrosc. Rev., 2002,
7, 275; S. D. Hanton, Chem. Rev., 2001, 101 , 527.
7
8
2
3
For examples of MALDI-TOF of inorganic macromolecules, see: H. R.
Allcock, C. R. de Denus, R. Prange and W. R. Laredo, Macromolecules,
n
We speculate that species 4 (n = 3–10), if not arising from
fragmentation, could also result from backbiting during the
polymerisation reaction. The proposed mechanism would involve
nucleophilic attack of the growing carbanionic chain-end on either
2
001, 34, 2757; B. M. White, W. P. Watson, E. E. Barthelme and H. W.
Beckham, Macromolecules, 2002, 35, 5345; F. H. Köhler, A. Schell and
B. Weber, Chem. Eur. J., 2002, 8, 5219; J.-C. Blais, C.-O. Turrin, A.-M.
Caminade and J.-P. Majoral, Anal. Chem., 2000, 72, 5097; V. Marvaud,
D. Astruc, E. Leize, A. Van Dorsselaer, J. Guittard and J. C. Blais, New
J. Chem., 1997, 21, 1309.
a P or C site in its own backbone – attack on C would give 4
n
after
H
2
O/H workup. Backbiting reactions of the type proposed are
2 2
O
uncommon in olefin polymerisation. However, similar backbiting
processes are very common in the anionic ring-opening polymer-
9 If a complex was doubly charged, the difference between peaks would
be 0.5 Da.
3
,11
isation of cyclic trisiloxanes [(R
nism necessitates the formation of cyclic oligomers (5
inspection of Fig. 1 (inset A and B) show that ions are detected
exactly 16 Da below 3 and 4 , respectively. These signals could be
due to a loss of oxygen or may also be assigned to cyclic oligomers
and 6 . Moreover, cyclic species are observed in the analysis of
BuLi initiated oligomers, confirming that they are 5 and 6 rather
than linear minus oxygen. Cyclic species are only observed up to n
5 for the MeLi initiated reaction. Further studies are underway to
2
SiO)
3
].
A backbiting mecha-
1
1
0 H. J. Räder and W. Schrepp, Acta Polymer., 1998, 49, 272.
1 For MALDI-TOF detection of cyclics in ROP of siloxanes or dioxane-
ones, see: M. Barrère, C. Maitre, M. A. Dourges and P. Hémery,
Macromolecules, 2001, 34, 7276; J. Libiszowski, A. Kowalski, R.
Szymanski, A. Duda, J.-M. Raquez, P. Degée and P. Dubois,
Macromolecules, 2004, 37, 52.
n
, 6 ). Close
n
n
n
5
n
n
n
n
1
2
2 Anionic polymerisation of RPNCR has been extended to a variety of
monomers: M. Yam, C.-W. Tsang, K. Noonan, J. Kingsley, B. O.
Patrick and D. P. Gates, Manuscript in preparation.
=
C h e m . C o m m u n . , 2 0 0 4 , 1 8 6 8 – 1 8 6 9
1869