T.-T. Zhang et al.
Journal of Solid State Chemistry 297 (2021) 122029
of Nb-Ot with distances of 1.75(1)-1.78(1)Å and Si-Ot with distances of
1.61(2)-1.63(2)Å, while the bridging oxygens can be grouped as: Si-Ob-Si
with a Si–O distance of 1.660(7)Å, Si-Ob-Nb with Si-Ob distances of
1.591(9)-1.66(1)Å and Nb-Ob distances of 2.02(1)-2.47(1)Å, and Nb-Ob-
compounds are different, leading to two different formulas. Secondly, the
space group of our compound is Pnnm, but the Nyman’s space group is
Pnn2. The higher symmetry space group of our compound indicates that
the two compounds are different. We also tried to solve the crystal
structure of compound 1 using the space group Pnn2. The resulting R
value (0.0891) of the space group Pnn2 is even relatively a little lower
than that of Pnnm (0.0943). However, we still choose Pnnm as the right
one, the reasons are listed as below: (a) we must use many hard restraints
to refine the structure when using Pnn2 as the space group; (2) the Pnn2
structure showed a Flack parameter of 0.46(10); (3) many solvent mol-
ecules cannot be found in the Fourier maps when using Pnn2 as the space
group; and (4) most importantly, Pnnm is a higher symmetry space
group. The cif result of Pnn2 is also supplied in the supporting infor-
mation for comparison.
Nb with Nb–O distances of 1.84(1)-2.17(1) Å.
11ꢀ
The asymmetric unit is composed of half a [H3(SiOH)2Si2Nb16O54
]
,
two and two halves Naþ ions, one and a quarter of [Cu(en)2(H2O)2]2þ, and
13 dissociated water molecules. The two and two halves Naþ ions could be
classified into two groups, Na(1), Na(2) and Na(3) belong to one group,
while Na(4) forms the other group by itself. Na–O distances of the former
group are 2.38(1)-2.95(2)Å. Na(1) is entrapped in the pit of
[H3(SiOH)2Si2Nb16O54
two {SiO4} of [H3(SiOH)2Si2Nb16O54
molecules. The two water oxygens as bridges, at the same time, connecttwo
Na(1) from two neighboring [H3(SiOH)2Si2Nb16O54
11ꢀ, forming a novel
]
11ꢀ, and interacts with four bridging oxygens from
11ꢀ and two oxygens from two water
]
]
dipolymer. Except the Na(1) bridges, a pair of Na(2) as two bridges simul-
taneously connect two terminal oxygens from two {SiO4} of two
3.3. Crystal structure of compound 2
[H3(SiOH)2Si2Nb16O54]
11ꢀ, indicating that the pair of Na(2) plays the same
The single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis shows that compound 2
role ofthe wateroxygensattachedtoNa(1). Itshould benotedthatthere are
crystallizes in the monoclinic space group I2. There are half
a
11ꢀ
[SiNb18O54]
14ꢀ, a [Cu(en)2(H2O)2]2þ, a [Cu(en)2(H2O)]2þ, a [Cu(en)2]
two such pairs of Na(2) sandwiched by the two [H3(SiOH)2Si2Nb16O54
]
.
2þ, one and two halves of Kþ, and 8 dissociated water molecules in the
asymmetric unit of compound 2. As for the cluster in compound 2,
although both compounds 1 and 2 are prepared from the same sources of
{Nb6O19}, compound 2 reserved two whole Lindqvist units in its cluster.
Each Na(2) is three-coordinated by two terminal oxygens from two
11ꢀ
[H3(SiOH)2Si2Nb16O54
]
as well as one water molecule. In addition,
Na(3) is attached to two terminal oxygens from two {NbO5} of the two
[H3(SiOH)2Si2Nb16O54
11ꢀ, that is to say, the Na(3) also as a bridge links
the two [H3(SiOH)2Si2Nb16O54
11ꢀ. There are four such Na(3), each two of
which are linked by a water oxygen, acting as the two-sodium-bridge con-
necting the two adjoining H3(SiOH)2Si2Nb16O54
11ꢀ. Each Na(3) is six-
]
]
And the two {Nb6O19} units with a unique hexavacant {B–SiNb6O26
Keggin fragment by corner-sharing form the complete [SiN-
18O54
14ꢀcluster which has a crescent-like shape, as depicted in
Fig. 2(a). There are five types of oxygens in the [SiNb18O54 2-O,
14ꢀ: Ot,
3-O, 4-O, and 6-O. Fourteen Ot each are only connected to a Nb with
Nb–O distances of 1.752(5)-1.782(5)Å; thirty six 2-bridging O each
coordinate with two Nb atoms with Nb–O distances of 1.812(5)-2.130(6)
Å; two 3-bridging O each connect two Nb and one Si atoms with Nb–O
distances of 2.191(5)-2.197(5)Å and a Si–O distance of 1.657(5)Å; two
4-O each join three Nb and one Si atoms with Nb–O distances of
2.362(5)-2.514(5)Å and a Si–O distance of 1.623(5)Å, and two central
6-O each are linked to six Nb atoms with Nb–O distances of 2.226(5)-
2.529(5) Å.
Besides that, K(1) is seven-coordinated by four oxygens from a
}
]
b
]
coordinated by two terminal oxygens from two [H3(SiOH)2Si
]
μ
11ꢀ
2Nb16O54
]
as well as four water molecules. Therefore, there are two
μ
μ
μ
Na(1), four Na(2) and four Na(3) are sandwiched by the two
H3(SiOH)2Si2Nb16O54
11ꢀ, forming a novel dipolymer, as depicted in
Fig. 1(b). The two Na(1), four Na(2) and four Na(3) give rise to a {Na10
μ
]
}
μ
bridge joins two {Si4Nb16}, forming the novel dipolymer. In addition, the
shortest distance between two Na(2) is 3.09(2)Å, which is comparable to
the previously reported Na–Na distances [44,62].
Besides that, Na(4) is coordinated by 7 oxygens, four terminal ones
originate from two adjacent dipolymers, and the other three are disso-
ciated water molecules with Na–O distances in the range of 2.54(5)-
2.84(1)Å. As shown in Fig. 1(c), two Na(4) as two inorganic bridges
simultaneously connects two dipolymers to construct a novel 1-D chain
structure.
μ
μ
14ꢀ
[SiNb18O54
]
and three oxygens from three water molecules, indi-
cating that K(1) is supported by the [SiNb18O54]14-, while K(2) is eight-
coordinated by six oxygens originating from a [SiNb18O54]14- and two
oxygens from two water molecule with K–O distances of 2.919(6)-
3.06(2)Å, meaning that K(2) is located in the pit of the crescent-like
Except for the sodium metals, two [Cu(en)2(H2O)2]2þ surround the
cluster. The Cu belongs to [Cu(en)2(H2O)2]2þ which exhibits an octa-
hedral geometry with four nitrogens from two en and two oxygens from
two water molecules with Cu–N distances in the range of 2.00(1)-2.02(1)
Å and Cu–O distances of 2.5856(1)-2.7093(1)Å. Along the a axis, the Cu-
en complexes and cluster present a highly organized arrangement, each
cluster. K(3) is seven-coordinated by three oxygens from
a
14ꢀ
[SiNb18O54
]
14ꢀ, one oxygen from another [SiNb18O54
]
and three
oxygens from three water molecules, that is to say, K(3) acts as a bridge
14ꢀ
linking two neighboring [SiNb18O54
]
to form a 2-D extended frame-
14ꢀ is connected
to four K(3), while each K(3) is linked to two [SiNb18O54
14ꢀ, thus, via
14ꢀ, a novel 2-D frame-
of the clusters was surrounded by eight symmetrical [Cu(en)2(H2O)2]2þ
.
work structures. As shown in Fig. 2(b), each [SiNb18O54
]
Because the last synthesis step is evaporation, there are many disso-
ciated water molecules in compound 1, and thus a large number of
hydrogen bonds exist. There are strong N–H⋯O interactions between
nitrogens of copper fragments and oxygens of water molecules and
PONbs with N⋯O distances in the range of 2.983(19)-3.274(16) Å. And
there also exist many C–H⋯O interactions between carbons of copper
fragments and oxygens of water molecules with C⋯O distances in the
range of 3.25(3)-3.45(4) Å. However, the number of O–H⋯O hydrogen
bonds is the largest, and the O⋯O distances of O–H⋯O interactions
between water molecules and oxygens from PONbs are of 2.59(3)-
3.12(6)Å, while the O⋯O distances of O–H⋯O interactions between any
two close water molecules are of 2.89(3)-2.91(3)Å. Therefore, via the
linking of these strong hydrogen bonds, copper fragments, water mole-
cules and PONbs are connected to form a supramolecular structure.
Nyman et al. reported a compound [44] that is structurally very
similar to compound 1. However, detailed analysis of the two structures
found that there are some differences between the two. Firstly, the
numbers of the sodium and the dissociated water molecules of the two
]
the connections between K(3) and [SiNb18O54
]
work structure was constructed.
The three crystallographically different copper ions form three
different coordination complexes: [Cu(en)2(H2O)2]2þ, [Cu(en)2(H2O)]2þ
and [Cu(en)2]2þ. Cu(1) of [Cu(en)2(H2O)2]2þ exhibits an octahedral
geometry with four nitrogens from two en and two oxygens from two
water molecules with Cu–N distances in the range of 1.987(8)-2.012(9)Å
and Cu–O distances in the range of 2.6296(1)-2.7078(1)Å. Cu(2) of
[Cu(en)2(H2O)]2þ shows a square-pyramidal geometry with four nitro-
gens from two en and one oxygens from one water molecules with Cu–N
distances in the range of 1.996(9)-2.01(1) Å and a Cu–O distance of
2.4816(1) Å. And both the Cu(1) and Cu(2) complexes only served as the
charge compensation and space filling agents. However, the Cu(3) of the
metal complex [Cu(en)2]2þ which is not only linked to four nitrogens
from two en but also axially linked to two oxygens from two clusters
plays a key role in the whole structure with Cu–N distances in the range
of 2.006(9)-2.017(9) Å and a Cu–O distance of 2.4867(1)Å. Each Cu(3)
4