258
YAUL et al.
7. Mohebbi, J., Nikpour, S., and Rayati, S., J. Mol. Catal.,
, 2006, vol. 256, p. 265.
63.98% is observed in the range 340–800°C, which
corresponds to the loss of the remaining part of the
ligand. The three stages were also denoted by the DTG
A
8. Butler, A. and Carrano, C.J., Coord. Chem. Rev., 1991,
vol. 109, p. 152.
peaks at about 92, 334, and 743°C, respectively. The
final residue vanadium oxide has the observed weight
17.92% against the calculated value 17.81%.
The thermal decomposition of complex III showed
two decomposition stages in the temperatures ranges
9. Masuda, Y., Thermochim. Acta, 1983, vol. 60, p. 203.
10. Jeyraja, G.L. and House (Jr.), J.E., Thermochim. Acta
1983, vol. 66, p. 289.
,
11. Furniss, B.S., Hannaford, A.J., Smith, P.W.G., and
Tatchell, A.R., Vogel’S Textbook of Practical Organic
Chemistry, London: Logmans, 1989.
170–255 and 255–740
DTG peaks at 212 and 629
°
C
. They were donated by the
°C. The first stage of
decomposition agreed with a weight loss of 12.96%,
which may be due to the loss of 50% of the ligand. The
second stage indicates a weight loss of 69.18%, which
may correspond, to the loss of the remaining part of
the ligand and the oxidation of the metal to a residue
of VO2, which is stable above this temperature [26].
12. Freedman, H.H., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1961, vol. 83,
p. 2900.
13. Natarajan, K., Karvembu, R., Hemalatha, S., and
Prabhakaran, R., Inorg. Chem. Commun., 2003, vol. 6,
p. 486.
14. Gupta, K.C. and Sutar, A.K., J. Mol. Catal., A, 2007,
vol. 272, p. 64.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
15. Yaul, A.R., Dhande, V.V., Suryawanshi, N.J., and
Aswar, A.S., Pol. J. Chem., 2009, vol. 83, p. 565.
The authors are grateful to the Director, C.D.R.I. Lucꢀ
know for recording the IR spectra and elemental analyses;
S.A.I.F., IIT Chennai for recording the electronic spectra.
We also thank Prof. R. Prasad, School of Chemical Sciꢀ
ences, D.A. University, Indore, for recording the gas chroꢀ
16. Aranha, E.P., Dos Santos, M.P., Romera, S., and
Dockel, E.R., Polyhedron, 2007, vol. 26, p. 1373.
17. Vafazadef, R. and Kashfi, M., Bull. Korean Chem. Soc.
2007, vol. 2817, p. 1228.
,
matograms. One of the authors (A.R. Yaul) is grateful to 18. Garg, R., Fahmi, N., and Singh, R.V., J. Indian Chem.
Soc., 2009, vol. 86, p. 670.
the University Grant Commission (New Delhi, India) for
providing financial support.
19. Raman, N., Pitchaikaniraja, Y., and Kulandaisamy, A.,
Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., 2001, vol. 113, p. 183.
20. Dutta, S.K. and Edward, R.T., Polyhedron, 1997,
REFERENCES
vol. 16, p. 1863.
1. Dey, K., Bhaumik, B.B.., and Sarkar, S., Indian J.
Chem., Sect. A: Inorg., Bioꢀinorg., Phys., Theor. Anal.
Chem. 2004, vol. 43, p. 773.
21. Lever, A.B.P., Inorganic Electronic Spectroscopy
,
Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1997.
22. Ghosh, T., Bhattacharya, S., Das, A., et al., Inorg.
Chem. Acta, 2005, vol. 358, p. 989.
2. Lu, Z. and Anson, F.C., Inorg. Chem., 2001, vol. 40,
p. 1329.
23. Joseph, T., Srinivas, D., Gopinath, C.S., and Halligudi, S.B.,
3. Ando, R., Ono, H., Yagyu, T., and Maeda, M., Inorg.
Chim. Acta, 2004, vol. 357, p. 817.
Catal. Lett., 2002, vol. 83, p. 209.
24. Zsigmond, A., Horvath, A., and Notheisz, F., J. Mol.
Catal., A, 2001, vol. 171, p. 95.
4. Maurya, M.R., Kumar, M., and Arya, A., Catal. Comꢀ
mun., 2008, vol. 10, p. 187.
25. Wasi, N. and Singh, H.B., Synth. Ract. Inorg. Met.ꢀOrg.
Chem., 1988, vol. 18, p. 473.
5. Boghaei, D.M. and Mohebbi, S., Tetrahedron, 2002,
vol. 58, p. 5357.
6. Masuda, Y. and Shishido, S., Thermochim. Acta, 1979, 26. Modi, C.K. and Thaker, B.T., J. Therm. Anal. Cal.
,
vol. 28, p. 377.
2008, vol. 94, p. 567.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF COORDINATION CHEMISTRY Vol. 36
No. 4
2010