J. L. Sutclie-Goulden et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 10 (2000) 1501±1503
1503
removed by simple ®ltration, and in the cleavage the
Acknowledgements
radiotracer was obtained by evaporation of the acid. In this
case, the radiochemical purity of the peptide was >95%
however; in some cases, puri®cation may be required.
We thank the Guy's and St Thomas' Trust for ®nancial
support and to Dr A. E. Theobald and Professor R. C.
Hider for useful comments.
In an attempt to ®nd a more ecient, selective and ver-
satile approach for the [18F]labelling of synthetic pep-
tides a solid phase strategy was developed. This strategy
oers a number of advantages over the present peptide
labelling methods in the solution phase. The peptide-
XAL-PEG-PS has been eciently labelled with 4-
[18F]¯uorobenzoic acid within 3 min using HATU as the
activating agent and the [18F]labelled peptide was released
from the solid support within 7 min with TFA with an
overall radiochemical labelling yield of (70±80%). This
percetage yield is based on the [18F] 4-¯ourobenzoic acid
and it is at the end of the synthesis, not decay corrected,
n=20, SEM 10%. During the release of the peptide from
the solid support, scrambling of [18F] with TFA was not
observed. The solid phase strategy is very ecient and the
[18F]labelling was complete within 20 min, excluding the
synthesis of the [18F]F K+ APE 2.2.2. In the solid
phase approach the peptide chemistry was optimised
and all reactions are expected to proceed in 99.99%
yields. Prior to the labelling with the 4-¯uorobenzoic
acid, only one reactive site was made available and
hence the process is completely speci®c and highly
reproducible. In this case, the a-amino group was
deprotected, similarly the E-amino group of lysine can
be deprotected using allyl chemistry and other groups
such as carboxyl or hydroxyl could be deprotected as
required. This approach is readily adapted to the
synthesis of cyclic peptides and peptides containing
disulphide bridges and hence this approach is extremely
versatile. This methodology can also be adapted to Boc-
benzyl chemistry although some of the protecting
groups will have to be changed. Whilst solution phase
chemistry requires time consuming extractions and pur-
i®cation, in the solid phase approach the reagents and
byproducts are removed by simple ®ltration. In this
case, the peptide was very clean and did not require pur-
i®cation, it is possible to release the peptide from the solid
support, evaporate the TFA and inject the crude peptide
directly into a HPLC column for puri®cation. 10±50MBq
of [18F] ¯ouride was used and the speci®c activity of the
peptide was 20±25 GBq/mmol. As with solid phase peptide
synthesis and solid phase combinatorial organic synthesis,
this process may be readily automated and many instru-
ments are commercially available.
References
1. Vaidyanathan, G.; Zalutsky, M. R. Nuclear Med. Biol.
1997, 24, 171.
2. Vaidyanathan, G.; Zalutsky, M. R. Nuclear Med. Biol.
1995, 22, 759.
3. Guhlke, S.; Wester, H. J.; Bruns, C.; Stocklin, G. Nuclear
Med. Biol. 1994, 21, 819.
4. Moody, T. W.; Leyton, J.; Unsworth, E.; John, C.; Lang,
L.; Eckelman, W. C. Peptides 1998, 19, 585.
5. Vaidyanathan, G.; Bigner, D. D.; Zalutsky, M. R. J.
Nuclear Med. 1992, 33, 1533.
6. Wester, H. J.; Hamacher, K.; Stocklin, G. Nuclear Med.
Biol. 1996, 23, 365.
7. Dolle, F.; Hinnen, F.; Vaufrey, F.; Tavitian, B.; Crouzel, C.
J. Lab. Comp. Radiopharm. 1997, 39, 319.
8. Lang, L.; Eckelman, W. C. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 1994, 44,
1085.
9. Lang, L.; Eckelman, W. C. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 1997, 48,
169.
10. Guhlke, S.; Coenen, H. H.; Stocklin, G. Appl. Radiat. Isot.
1994, 45, 715.
11. Vaidyanathan, G.; Zalutsky, M. R. Nuclear Med. Biol.
1992, 19, 275.
12. Wester, H. J.; Krommeich, C. H.; Fixmann, A.; Former,
W.; Muller-Gartner, H. W.; Stocklin, D. Lab. Comp. Radio-
pharm. 1995. 37, 513.
13. Barlos, K.; Gatos, D.; Koutsogianni, S. J. of Pept. Res.
1998, 51, 194.
14. Fields, C. G.; Fields, G. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34,
6661.
15. Carpino, L. A.; Shro, H.; Triolo, S. A.; Mansour, E. M.
E.; Wenschuh, H.; Albericio, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34,
7829.
16. Aletras, A.; Barlos, K.; Gatos, D.; Koutsogianni, S.;
Mamos, P. Int. J. of Pept. Prot. Res. 1995, 45, 488.
17. Han, Y.; Bontems, S. L.; Hegyes, P.; Munson, M. C.;
Minor, C. A.; Kates, S. A.; Albericio, F.; Barany, G. J. Org.
Chem. 1996, 61, 6326.
18. Knorr, R.; Trzeciak, A.; Bannwarth, W.; Gillessen, D.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 48.
19. Pearson, D. A.; Blanchette, M.; Baker, M. L.; Guindon, C.
A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 2739.
20. Carpino, L. A.; Elfaham, A.; Minor, C. A.; Albericio, F. J.
Chem. Soc. Ð Chem. Commun. 1994, 201.
21. Carpino, L. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 4397.
22. Bo®ll, J. M.; Albericio, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40,
2641.
23. Sieber, P.; Riniker, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 739.
24. Gausepohl, H.; Kraft, M.; Frank, R. W. Int. J. Pept. Pro-
tein Res. 1989, 34, 287.
In conclusion, the current study has demonstrated that
the solid phase strategy presented has a number of
advantages in the labelling of peptides with [18F]. It is
fast, ecient, clean, selective, highly versatile and may
be readily automated. The [18F]labelled peptides were
synthesised within 20 min with a high speci®c activity.
25. Haka, M. S.; Kilbourn, M. R.; Watkins, G. L.; Toor-
angian, S. A. J. Lab. Comp. Radiopharm. 1989, 27.