TURCOTTE et al.: BLACK POWDER
117
charcoal also promoted by the presence of O in the gas phase. The second peak
2
would then be the result of oxidation of the charcoal by KNO3.
The temperatures for the onset of run-away reactions in black powder obtained
by ARC and HFC are much lower than those observed in DSC and DTA experiments.
This is believed to be due to the larger sample sizes used in the former, which can
lead to either an autocatalytic reaction or to quasi-adiabatic conditions in the central
area of the samples. With 0.5 g samples, T values as low as 190°C were observed in
0
HFC experiments, even in an inert atmosphere. Also, direct oxidation of sulfur in the
gas phase was observed at low temperature (160°C) in the HFC experiments in air at
ambient pressure. This is consistent with the increased early SO production noted
2
above in the FTIR and MS observations. While no such low temperature exotherm
could be observed in the corresponding ARC data, run-away is observed at a lower
temperature (140°C) in the latter when an elevated initial air pressure was used.
These observations may have important implications on the hazards of processing
black powder, particularly under conditions where long residence times may occur
with air intimately mixed with the powder, or under pressurized air atmosphere.
Significant variations in thermal behavior as a function of particle size were ob-
served in the present work. It appears that larger particles may lead to lower T val-
0
ues. However, the more complex exotherms displayed by samples with larger particle
size may also result from the different origins of the samples. This may be caused by
the use of different charcoal, for example. It is well known that variability in the char-
acteristics of charcoal can cause significant differences in the thermal behavior of
black powder [5, 20].
*
* *
The authors would like to thank Hands Fireworks Inc. for providing some of the samples of black
powder.
References
1
A. Marshall, ’Explosives – Their Manufacture, Properties, Tests and History’, P. Blakiston’s
Son & Co., Philadelphia 1915.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
J. P. Cundill, ‘A Dictionary of Explosives’, The Royal Engineers Institute, Chatham 1889.
R. A. Sasse, Proc. Int. Pyrotech. Seminar, 9 (1984) 47.
D. J. Wood, Proc. Int. Pyrotech. Seminar, 10 (1985) 71.
J. D. Blackwood and F. P. Bowden, Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 213 (1952) 285.
C. Campbell and G. Weingarten, Trans. Far. Soc., 55 (1959) 2221.
Henkin and McGill, Ind. Eng. Chem., 44 (1952) 1391.
G. Hussain and G. J. Rees, Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 15 (1990) 43.
M. E. Brown and R. A. Rugunanan, Thermochim. Acta, 134 (1988) 413.
th
1
0 D. E. G. Jones, H. Feng and R. C. Fouchard, 4 Int. Sym. Fireworks, 1 (1998) 155.
1 ASTM E 967, ASTM E 968, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken,
PA, USA.
1
1
2 ASTM E 1582, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
J. Therm. Anal. Cal., 73, 2003