ACS Catalysis
Letter
aldehydes can be rationalized by assuming Scheme 3. A
condensation reaction between 1 and an alcohol results in the
formation of hemiacetal 5, which undergoes oxidative
dehydrogenation to give 2.
Scheme 4. Reaction Studied for Assessing the Practical
Applicability of Our Catalytic System
Scheme 3. Reaction Pathway for the Oxidative Esterification
of Aldehydes via the Formation of Hemiacetal 5 as the Key
Intermediate
In conclusion, we have developed novel supported AuNiOx
nanoparticles having a core−shell structure that can efficiently
catalyze the aerobic oxidative esterification of aldehydes with
alcohols under mild and neutral reaction conditions. This
strategy provides an efficient and environmentally benign
method for the synthesis of esters. We are currently working on
the reaction mechanism and with the aim of possibly extending
this catalysis system to other oxidation reactions.
Stability and long life are the key requirements of an effective
catalyst. We precisely controlled the distribution of AuNiOx
nanoparticles in the catalyst to decrease any loss of metals and
to achieve high activity. Loss of metals from catalyst can occur
because of detachment or abrasion under reaction. The
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
■
*
S
Supporting Information
AuNiO layer was sharply distributed in a region within a 10-
x
Details of the experimental procedures and characterization
μm depth from the catalyst surface layer, and AuNiO was
x
shifted by submicrometer from the surface of the catalyst to
inside (Figure 3). The catalytic life of AuNiO /SiO −Al O −
x
2
2
3
AUTHOR INFORMATION
■
*
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
REFERENCES
■
(
1) Otera, J. Esterification: Methods, Reaction and Applications; Wiley-
VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2003.
(2) Dehydrogenaton: (a) Murahashi, S.-I.; Naota, T.; Ito, K.; Maeda,
Y.; Taki, H. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 4319−4327. Oxidation with
hydrogen peroxide: (b) Gopinath, R.; Patel, B. K. Org. Lett. 2000, 2,
5
1
77−579. (c) Wu, X.-F.; Darcel, C. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 1144−
147. (d) Gopinath, R.; Barkakaty, B.; Talukdar, B.; Patel, B. K. J. Org.
Figure 3. Electron-probe microanalysis spectra of a single particle of
Chem. 2003, 68, 2944−2947. Oxidation with TBHP: (e) Hashmi, A.
S. K.; Lothschuetz, C.; Ackermann, M.; Doepp, R.; Anantharaman, S.;
Marchetti, B.; Bertagnolli, H.; Rominger, F. Chem.Eur. J. 2010, 16,
AuNiO /SiO −Al O −MgO. (a) Secondary electron image and line
x
2
2
3
analysis. (b) Color mapping display corresponding to the concen-
tration of the element distribution.
8
012−8019. Oxidation with benzyl chloride: (f) Liu, C.; Tang, S.;
Zheng, L.; Liu, D.; Zhang, H.; Lei, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51,
5
2
662−5666. Review: (g) Ekoue-Kovi, K.; Wolf, C. Chem.Eur. J.
008, 14, 6302−6315.
MgO was evaluated by using a continuous-flow reaction
apparatus (Figure S6, Supporting Information). When the
conversion efficiency of the reaction was maintained at ∼60%,
(3) (a) Haruta, M.; Kobayashi, T.; Sano, H.; Yamada, N. Chem. Lett.
1987, 405−408. (b) Haruta, M.; Yamada, N.; Kobayashi, T.; Iijima, S.
J. Catal. 1989, 115, 301−309.
(
4) Reviews: (a) Hashmi, A. S. K; Hutchings, G. J. Angew. Chem., Int.
2
a was obtained with high selectivity (96−97%). No decrease
Ed. 2006, 45, 7896−7936. (b) Arcadi, A. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 3266−
in the catalyst activity was observed over a period of 1000 h.
Furthermore, metal leaching was negligible during prolonged
reactions. The concentration of Au and Ni in the reaction
mixture was determined to be <2.5 ppb by ICP-AES. TEM
observation of the catalyst after the reaction showed no
sintering of the AuNiO nanoparticles. The TEM/STEM-EDX,
UV−vis, and FT-IR results confirmed that the core−shell
structure of AuNiO was preserved.
3
3
2
3
325. (c) Li, Z.; Brouwer, C.; He, C. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 3239−
265. (d) Pina, C. D; Falletta, E.; Prati, L.; Rossi, M. Chem. Soc. Rev.
008, 37, 2077−2095. (e) Corma, A.; Garcia, H. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008,
7, 2096−2126.
(
5) (a) Marsden, C.; Taarning, E.; Hansen, D.; Johansen, L.;
x
Klitgaard, S. K.; Egeblad, K.; Christensen, C. H. Greem Chem 2008, 10,
168−170. (b) Fristrup, P.; Johansen, L. B.; Christensen, C. H. Chem.
Commun. 2008, 2750−2752. (c) Su, F.-Z; Ni, J.; Sun, H.; Cao, Y.; He,
H.-Y.; Fan, K.-N. Chem.Eur. J. 2008, 14, 7131−7135. (d) Taarning,
E.; Nielsen, L. S.; Egeblad, K.; Madsen, R.; Christensen, C. H.
ChemSusChem. 2008, 1, 75−78. (e) Xu, B.; Liu, X.; Haubrich, J.;
Friend, C. M. Nat. Chem. 2009, 2, 61−65.
x
The practical applicability of this catalytic system was verified
in a 100 000 ton/year MMA production plant. Thus, isobutene
6
was oxidized in the gaseous phase using a Mo−Bi catalyst to
synthesize 1a. Subsequent oxidative esterification of 1a in the
(6) (a) Abad, A.; Concepcion, P.; Corma, A.; Garcia, H. Angew.
presence of methanol using the AuNiO catalyst produced 2a
x
Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4066−4069. (b) Hayashi, T.; Inagaki, T.;
Itayama, N.; Baba, H. Catal. Today. 2006, 117, 210−213. (c) Nielsen,
I. S.; Taarning, E.; Egeblad, K.; Madsen, R.; Christensen, C. H. Catal.
Lett. 2007, 116, 35−40. (d) Jorgensen, B.; Christiansen, S. E;
Thomsen, M. L. D.; Christensen, C. H. J. Catal. 2007, 251, 332−337.
(
Scheme 4). This process confirmed the high selectivity, high
activity, and long life of the AuNiO catalyst. This catalyst
x
would help in saving energy and resources, in addition to being
highly economical.
1
848
dx.doi.org/10.1021/cs4004084 | ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 1845−1849