SYNTHESIS AND KINETIC ANALYSIS OF ISOTHERMAL AND NONISOTHERMAL DECOMPOSITION OF
AMMONIUM DINITRAMIDE PRILLS
Ea
ADN prills. The dependence of E with a by all the
a
lng(a )=lnA–
+ lnt
(8)
methods is similar in shape and the apparent E values
RT
a
for conversion (0.2<a £0.95) are in the order of
Vyazovkin >FR>standard isoconversional method. In
the initial stages of decomposition (0.05£a £0.2), the
Ea value increases and in the latter stages (0.2<a £0.95)
it decreases. A comparison of the results obtained
indicates that the thermal stability of ADN prills was
much higher than that of neat crystalline ADN.
For each a , rearrangement of Eq. (8) gives Eq. (9).
é A ù
(9)
E
aa
–
lnt =ln
–
a
ê
ú
g(a )
ë
RT
û
where t is the time at conversion a . Under isothermal
a
conditions for each a , Eaa is calculated from the slope
of the plot of –lnt
Equation (9) has been applied to the isothermal data
for the decomposition of ADN prills (data from
Fig. 8) which permits the determination of E as a
a
vs. 1/T regardless of the model.
References
a
1
2
3
J. C. Bottaro, Chem. Ind., (1996) 249.
function of a . The dependence of activation energy
on conversion for the isothermal decomposition of
ADN prills is shown in Fig. 12.
S. Borman, Chem. Eng. News, (1994) 18.
A. Langlet, N. Wingborg and H. Ostmark, Challenges in
Propellants and Combustion –100 Years After Nobel,
K. K. Kuo, Ed., Begell House, New York 1997, p. 616.
M. L. Chan, A. Turner and L. Merwin,Challenges in
Propellants and Combustion –100 Years After Nobel,
K. K. Kuo, Ed., Begell House, New York 1997, p. 627.
J. C. Bottaro, P. E. Penwell and R. J. Schmitt, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 119 (1997) 9405.
4
5
6
7
8
9
S. Venkatachalam, G. Santhosh and K. N. Ninan, Prop.
Expl. Pyro., 29 (2004) 178.
R. Yang, P. Thakre and V. Yang, Comb. Expl. Shock
Waves, 41 (2005) 657.
C. J. Hinshaw, R. B. Wardle and T. K. Highsmith,
PCT WO 9424073 A1, 1994.
C. J. Hinshaw, R. B. Wardle and T. K. Highsmith,
US Patent 5498303, 1998.
Fig. 12 Dependence of activation energy on conversion for
1
1
0 M. J. Rossi, J. C. Bottaro and D. F. McMillen, Int.
J. Chem. Kin., 25 (1993) 549.
the isothermal decomposition of ADN prills
1 J. C. Oxley, J. L. Smith, W. Zheng, R. Rogers and
M. D. Coburn, J. Phys. Chem. A, 101 (1997) 5646.
It is seen that the E
values bear a strong relation-
a
ship to the degree of conversion. The activation energy
–
1
12 A. S. Tompa, R. F. Boswell, P. Skahan and C. Gotzmer,
J. Thermal. Anal., 49 (1997) 1161.
3 S. Vyazovkin and C. A. Wight, J. Phys. Chem. A,
01 (1997) 7217.
4 A. S. Tompa, Thermochim. Acta, 357–358 (2000) 177.
rises from about 100 kJ mol at low conversion to
–
about 165 kJ mol at a =0.27 and it subsequently de-
creases to 145 kJ mol near the completion of the re-
1
1
1
–
1
1
action. The mean activation energy for conversion
–
1
(
0.05£a £0.27) is 151.9 kJ mol–1 and for conversion
0.27<a £0.95) is 156.3 kJ mol which is lower than
15 G. Santhosh, S. Venkatachalam, A. U. Francis,
rd
K. Krishnan, K. B. Catherine and K. N. Ninan, 33 Int.
Annu. Conf. ICT, 2002, p. 64-1.
(
that of the values obtained by FR and Vyazovkin
method. In the present study a comparison of the de-
pendencies of E
on a by non-isothermal and isother-
mal methods should not be made because the former
covers a wide range of temperature (120 to 230°C)
while the latter covers a narrow range of temperature
1
1
1
6 G. Santhosh, S. Venkatachalam, K. Krishnan,
th
K. B. Catherine and K. N. Ninan, 34 Int. Annu. Conf.
a
ICT, 2003, p. 16-1.
7 P. Sjoberg, R. Wardle and T. Highsmith, Insensitive
Munitions and Energetic Materials Technology
Symposium, 2001, Vol. 1, p. 466.
(
125 to 150°C).
8 T. K. Highsmith, C. S. McLeod, R. B. Wardle and
R. Hendrickson, US Patent No. 6136115 and
WO 99/01408, 1999.
Conclusions
19 T. K. Highsmith and H. E. Johnston, US Patent
No. 6610157, 2003.
0 U. Teipel, T. Heintz and H. Krause, Prop. Expl. Pyro.,
5 (2000) 81.
2
ADN prills were prepared by emulsion crystallization
and non-isothermal and isothermal kinetic investigations
of the decomposition of ADN were carried out. Nonlinear
isoconversional techniques were applied to evaluate
2
2
2
1 U. Teipel, Chem. Eng. Technol., 27 (2004) 751.
th
2 S. Karlsson and H. Ostmark, 11 Int. Det. Symp.,
1998, p. 801.
the variation of E
a
with a at various conversions for
J. Therm. Anal. Cal., 94, 2008
269