154
E.C. Rodrigues et al. / Thermochimica Acta 451 (2006) 149–155
thermal decomposition of the lanthanide dioxycarbonate to
the respective oxides, as final residue (Calcd. (%) TG (%);
Dy2O3 = 69.72–69.85; HO2O3 = 69.45–69.59; Er2O3 = 69.19–
69.26; Tm2O3 = 69.00–68.57 and Y2O3 = 79.18–78.86), which
were confirmed by X-ray powder diffractometry.
For the last step, no endothermic peak is observed in the
DTA curve, probably due to the absorbed heat in this step is not
enough to produce the thermal event.
at 242 ◦C (Eu), 239 ◦C (Gd), 200 ◦C (Yb) and 191 ◦C (Lu) are
due to the irreversible phase transition. The broad exotherms
observed for all compounds between 350 and ≥600 ◦C, with-
out the appearance of definitive peaks, are attributed to the
thermal decomposition of the anhydrous compounds, where
the oxidation of the organic matter takes place in consecutive
steps.
4. Conclusion
compounds
From analytical and thermoanalytical (TG) results a general
formula could be established for these compounds in the solid-
state.
The X-ray powder patterns pointed out that the synthesized
compounds have a crystalline structure with evidence concern-
ing to the formation of isomorphous compounds.
The infrared spectroscopic data suggest that 4-methoxy-
benzoate act as a bridge and/or bidentate ligand toward the metal
ions considered in this work.
The TG–DTA curves of the europium compound are shown
in Fig. 3. The endothermic peak at 239 ◦C (Eu), 234 ◦C (Gd),
197 ◦C (Yb) and 190 ◦C (Lu) is due to the irreversible phase
transition and the endothermic peak at 264 ◦C (Eu), 260 ◦C (Gd),
212 ◦C (Yb) and 211 ◦C (Lu) is attributed to the reversible phase
transition.
The thermal decomposition of these compounds occurs
in three steps between 280–705 ◦C (Eu), 280–725 ◦C (Gd),
280–750 ◦C (Yb) and 280–720 ◦C (Lu), with the two first
corresponding to exothermic peaks. The last step is ascribed
to the thermal decomposition of the lanthanide dioxycar-
bonate to the respective oxides, as final residue (Calcd.
(%) – TG (%); Eu2O3 = 70.94–70.88; Gd2O3 = 70.32–70.16;
Yb2O3 = 68.55–68.61 and Lu2O3 = 68.33–67.80), which were
confirmed by X-ray powder diffractometry. For these com-
pounds, no thermal event corresponding to the last step is also
observed in the DTA curves.
The TG–DTA and DSC curves provided previously unre-
ported information about the thermal behaviour and thermal
decomposition of these compounds.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank FAPESP (Proc. 97/12646-8), CNPq and
CAPES foundations (Brazil) for financial support.
References
3.3. Phase transitions
[1] S.J. Yun, S.K. Kang, S.S. Yun, Thermochim. Acta 331 (1) (1999) 13.
[2] Z.M. Wang, L.J. Van de Burgt, G.R. Choppin, Inorg. Chim. Acta 167 (1999)
293.
[3] N. Arnaud, J. Georges, Analyst 125 (8) (2000) 1487.
[4] G.R. Choppin, Q. Liu, E.N. Rizkalla, Inorg. Chem. 145 (1988) 309.
[5] A.W.H. Lam, W.T. Wang, S. Gao, G. Wen, X.X. Zhang, Eu. J. Inorg. Chem.
1 (2003) 149.
[6] G.N. Makushova, S.B. Pirkes, E.Y. Levina, Zhurnal Neorganicheskoi
Khimii 30 (9) (1985) 2273.
[7] W. Ferenc, B. Bocian, J. Thermal Anal. Cal. 74 (2) (2003) 521.
[8] W. Brzyska, W. Ozga, J. Thermal Anal. Cal. 78 (2004) 999.
[9] W. Ferenc, A. Walkow-Dziewulska, B. Bocian, J. Thermal Anal. Cal. 79
(2005) 145.
[10] A. Kula, J. Thermal Anal. Cal. 81 (2005) 381.
[11] E.C. Rodrigues, A.B. Siqueira, E.Y. Ionashiro, G. Bannach, M. Ionashiro,
Ecl. Quim. 31 (1) (2006) 21.
[12] W. Lewandowski, J. Molec. Strut. 101 (1–2) (1983) 93.
[13] W. Lewandowski, H. Baranska, J. Raman Spectroscopy 17 (1) (1986)
17.
The endothermic peaks attributed to the irreversible (Eu, Gd,
Yb, Lu) and reversible (Eu-Lu, Y) phase transitions were con-
firmed by X-ray powder diffraction patterns and DSC curves.
Figs. 4–7 are shown the X-ray powder diffraction patterns and
DSC curves of the erbium and lutetium compounds, as repre-
sentative of all the compounds.
The reversible phase transition observed in all the com-
pounds, is in agreement with the literature data [6], except the
temperature where this event occurs. The disagreement in the
temperature undoubtedly is because the TG and DTA curves
were obtained in enough different conditions.
The irreversible phase transition observed in the europium,
gadolinium, ytterbium and lutetium compounds, have been
reported for the first time.
[14] T. Glowiak, H. Kozlowski, L. Strinna Erre, B. Gulinati, G. Micera, A. Pozzi,
S. Brunni, J. Coord. Chem. 25 (1992) 75.
3.4. DSC curves
[15] W. Brzyska, S. Karasinski, J. Thermal Anal. 39 (1993) 429.
[16] E.C. Rodrigues, A.B. Siqueira, E.Y. Ionashiro, G. Bannach, M. Ionashiro,
J. Thermal Anal. Cal. 79 (2005) 323.
[17] A.C. Vallejo, A.B. Siqueira, E.C. Rodrigues, E.Y. Ionashiro, G. Bannach,
M. Ionashiro, Ecl. Quim. 30 (3) (2005) 7.
[18] C.T. Carvalho, A.B. Siqueira, E.C. Rodrigues, M. Ionashiro, Ecl. Quim. 30
(4) (2005) 19.
[19] H.A. Flaschka, EDTA Titrations, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1964.
[20] M. Ionashiro, C.A.F. Graner, J. Zuanon Netto, Ecl. Quim. 8 (1983)
29.
The DSC curves of the compounds are shown in Fig. 8.
These curves show endothermic and exothermic events that
all accord with the mass losses observed in the TG curves
and endothermic peaks due to crystalline phase transition. The
small endothermic peaks at 268 ◦C (Eu), 263 ◦C (Gd), 233 ◦C
(Tb), 229 ◦C (Dy), 227 ◦C (Ho), 216 ◦C (Er), 209 ◦C (Tm),
216 ◦C (Yb), 215 ◦C (Lu) and 214 ◦C (Y) are attributed to the
reversible phase transition, while the small endothermic peaks