Letters in Organic Chemistry, 2009, 6, 535-539
535
Heterogeneous Phase Alkylation of Phenols Making Use of Phase Transfer
Catalysis and Microwave Irradiation
György Keglevich*,a, Erika Bálinta, Éva Karsaib, Judit Vargaa, Alajos Grüna,c, Mária Bálintb and
István Greinerd
aDepartment of Organic Chemistry and Technology, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, H-1521
Budapest, Hungary
bBálint Analytics, H-1116 Budapest, Fehérvári Street 144, Hungary
cResearch Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences at the Department of Organic Chemistry and Technology,
Budapest University of Technology and Economics, H-1521 Budapest, Hungary
dGedeon Richter Plc., H-1475 Budapest, Hungary
Received February 19, 2009: Revised April 29, 2009: Accepted September 09, 2009
Abstract: The benzylation of cresol was studied under liquid–liquid and solid–liquid phase transfer catalytic conditions.
Microwave irradiation was useful only in the solid–liquid phase benzylations. Using acetonitrile as the solvent, the
benzylations were fully O-selective, but complete conversions were obtained only in the presence of Cs2CO3. There was
no need to use an onium salt. In the absence of solvent, an O-selectivity of ca. 90% could be obtained in the presence of
an alkali carbonate and an onium salt. The optimum set of conditions was extended to the reaction of other phenol
derivatives and alkylating agents.
Keywords: O-alkylation, selectivity, phase transfer catalysis, microwave synthesis.
1. INTRODUCTION
was found that the O- versus C-selectivity can be fine-tuned
by the presence or absence of the base and PT catalyst [15].
In this paper, we wish to investigate in detail, how the
efficiency and selectivity of the alkylation of phenols can be
influenced.
The use of microwave (MW)-assisted phase transfer (PT)
catalytic methods represents an attractive alternative in
environmentally friendly chemistry [1,2]. In heterogeneous-
phase C-alkylations, the PT catalyst can be substituted by
MW irradiation [3,4]. In N-alkylations, the MW and PT
catalytic techniques complete well each other [5]. Regarding
O-alkylations, the PT catalyzed reactions can be
synergistically enhanced by MW irradiation. The alkylation
of phenols can be carried out in solid-liquid phase
conditions, using organic solvents and an alkali hydroxide as
the base [6,7]. Solvent-free alkylations in the presence of
K2CO3 or K2CO3 /NaOH have also been described [8,9].
Sodium phenolate may also form the solid phase [10].
Liquid–liquid phase alkylation, using aqueous NaOH and
e.g. toluene is another possibility [11]. In some cases there
was no need for a PT catalyst [12-14]. The combination of
PT catalytic and MW techniques is beneficial from the point
of view of rate enhancement, but details on the selectivity
have not been disclosed. Selectivity is generally a crucial
problem from the point of view of efficient accomplishment
of any reaction. Reproduction of the data may be difficult, as
the early experiments were accomplished in domestic MW
ovens. We made efforts to clarify the exact role of the PT
catalysts in MW-assisted alkylations [2-4,15], including the
benzylation of phenols [2,15]. In our preliminary study, it
2. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The benzylation of cresol was carried out first in a liquid-
liquid two phase system using toluene and 30% NaOH
solution at 60 °C, with vigorous stirring. In the absence of
the phase transfer catalyst, triethylbenzyl-ammonium
chloride (TEBAC), and in the presence of 1.5 eq. of NaOH,
not all of the cresol was consumed after 2.5 h and four
products, 4-methylphenyl benzyl ether (2a, 35%), 2-benzyl-
4-methylphenol (3a, 43%), 2-benzyl-4-methylphenyl benzyl
ether (4a, 7%), and 2,5-dibenzyl-4-methylphenol (5a, 11%)
were formed (Table 1/entry 1). Using 3.0 eq. of NaOH, the
conversion was complete and the quantity of products 2a,
3a, 4a, and 5a was 31, 12, 19, and 38%, respectively (Table
1/entry 2). As compared to the previous experiment (entry
1), the quantity of benzylcresol 3a decreased, while that of
dibenzyl products 4a and 5a increased. The benzylations
were also carried out in the presence of 5, 10, and 15% of
TEBAC using 1.5 eq. NaOH. In the above order, the quantity
of cresyl benzyl ether 2a was 62, 73, and 83%, respectively,
while that of the dibenzyl by-product 4a was 26, 25, and
13%, respectively. The quantity of phenols 3a and 5a was in
the range of 0–8% (Table 1/entries 3-5). In the presence of
TEBAC, an increase in the quantity of NaOH from 1.5 to 3
eq. did not have a significant impact on the outcome. The
isolated yield of cresyl benzyl ether 2a from the experiment
*Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Organic
Chemistry and Technology, Budapest University of Technology and
Economics, H-1521 Budapest, Hungary; Tel: +36 1 4631111/5883;
Fax: +36 1 4633648; E-mail: keglevich@mail.bme.hu
1570-1786/09 $55.00+.00
© 2009 Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.