Poly(Ethylene Glycol)-Supported Proline: Catalyst for Aldol and Iminoaldol Reactions
FULL PAPERS
3
8
.7 Hz, 2H, H meta to chloro], 6.44 [d, J(H,H) 8.8 Hz, 2H, H
[2] For recent applications to aldol and related reactions see:
a) B. List, R. A. Lerner, C. F. Barbas III, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000, 122, 2395 ± 2396; b) W. Notz, B. List, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7386 ± 7387; c) T. Bui, C. F. Barbas
III, Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 6951 ± 6954; d) B. List, P.
Pojarliev, C. Castello, Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 573 ± 575; e) K.
Sakthivel, W. Notz, T. Bui, C. F. Barbas III, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 5260 ± 5267.
ortho to chloro], 4.75 (brs, 1H, HC-3), 4.68 (brs, 1H, HC-4), 2.10
±1
(
s, 3H, methyl). IR (film liquid): n 3380, 1715 cm ; elemental
analysis calcd. (%) for C H ClNO (288.8): C 66.55, H 5.24, N,
1
6
15
2
4
.85; found: C 66.33, H 5.07, N, 4.99. The ee×s were determined
by HPLC (Daicel Chiralpack OD-H, hexane/i-PrOH 85:15,
flow rate 0.8 mL/min, l 270). Syn-15: t : 10.60 min (minor)
R
and 23.10 min (major). Anti-15: t : 9.10 min (major) and
R
1
1.35 min (minor).
[
3] For recent applications to iminoaldol reactions see: a) B.
List, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9336 ± 9337; b) W.
Notz, K. Sakthivel, T. Bui, G. Zhong, C. F. Barbas III,
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 199 ± 201.
(
4R,5S)-5-Methylcarbonyl-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-(4-
nitrophenyl)-2-oxazolidinone 16
[
4] For recent applications to conjugated addition reactions
see: a) M. Yamaguchi, T. Shiraishi, M. Hirama, J. Org.
Chem. 1996, 61, 3520 ± 3530; b) M. Yamaguchi, Y.
Igarashi, R. S. Reddy, T. Shraishi, M. Hirama, Tetrahe-
dron 1997, 53, 11223 ± 11236; c) S. Hanessian, V. Pham,
Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2975 ± 2978; d) B. List, P. Pojarliev,
H. J. Martin, Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2423 ± 2425.
To a cooled (0 8C), stirred solution of compound syn-14
0.130 g, 0.394 mmol) in dry toluene (5 mL), triethylamine
0.164 mL, 1.18 mmol), 4-dimethylaminopyridine (0.040 g,
.33 mmol), and a 20% solution of phosgene in toluene
0.227 mL, 0.44 mmol) were added in this order. After 1 h
stirring at 0 8C, water was added to the bright yellow solution.
The organic phase was separated, and the aqueous phase was
extracted twice with CH Cl . The combined organic phases
were dried over sodium sulfate and filtered, and the filtrate was
concentrated under vacuum to give the crude product. This was
purified by flash chromatography with a 7:3 hexanes:ethyl
acetate mixture as eluant. The product was obtained as a pale
yellow solid; yield: 55%; mp 260 ± 262 8C. Longer reaction
(
(
0
(
[
[
5] C.-H. Wong, R. L. Halcomb, Y. Ichikawa, T. Kajimoto,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 412 ± 432.
6] For recent reviews see: a) E. M. Carreira, in Compre-
hensive Asymmetric Catalysis, Vol. 3, chapter 29.1, (Eds.:
E. N. Jacobsen, A. Pfaltz, H. Yamamoto), Springer-
Verlag, Heidelberg, 1999; b) S. G. Nelson, Tetrahedron
Asymmetry 1998, 9, 357 ± 389.
2
2
1
times led to extensive product decomposition. H NMR: d
3
[7] For leading references to chiral Lewis-base catalyzed
enantioselective aldol reactions see: S. E. Denmark,
R. A. Stavenger, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8837 ±
8847 and references cited therein.
[8] R. Annunziata, M. Benaglia, M. Cinquini, F. Cozzi, M.
Pitillo, J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 3160 ± 3166.
8
.23 [d, J(H,H) 8.0 Hz, 2H, H ortho to nitro group], 7.55 [d,
3
J(H,H) 8.8 Hz, 2H, H meta to nitro group], 7.27 [d,
J(H,H) 9.2 Hz, 2H, H meta to methoxy group], 6.82 [d,
J(H,H) 9.0 Hz, 2H, H ortho to methoxy group], 5.64 [d,
3
3
3
3
J(H,H) 5.2 Hz, 1H, HC-5], 4.58 [d, J(H,H) 5.2 Hz, 1H,
HC-4], 3.75 (s, 3H, methoxy group), 2.48 (s, 3H, methyl group );
13
C NMR: d 204.3, 157.0, 154.0,148.0, 144.9, 127.8, 124.8,
[9] R. Annunziata, M. Benaglia, M. Cinquini, F. Cozzi, G.
Tocco, Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1737 ± 1739.
2
3
1
23.1, 115.8, 114.5, 82.6, 61.8, 55.5, 27.0; [a] : ±15.7 (c 0.7, CH
D
2
±1
Cl ); IR (CHCl ): n 1764, 1727, 1387 cm ; elemental analysis
2
3
[10] For an excellent review on the immobilization of ligands
and catalysts on polymer supports, see: a) Chiral Catalyst
Immobilization and Recycling, (Eds.: D. E. De Vos,
I. F. J. Vankelecom, P. A. Jacobs), Wiley-VCH, Wein-
heim, 2000; for reports concerning the use of PEG as
support in this context see: b) C. Bolm, A. Gerlach,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 741 ± 743; c) H.
Han, K. D. Janda, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36,
calcd. (%) for C H N O (356.3): C 60.67, H 4.53, N, 7.86;
18
16
2
6
found: C 60.53, H 4.44, N, 7.90.
Acknowledgements
Financial support fromCNR and MIUR ± Progetto Nazionale
Stereoselezione in Sintesi Organica. Metodologie ed Applica-
zioni is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Prof. Rita Annun-
ziata for valuable NMR assistance.
1
731 ± 1733; d) M. Glos, O. Reiser, Org. Lett. 2000, 2,
2
045 ± 2048.
[
11] For an excellent review on asymmetric organic catalysis
see: P. I. Dalko, L. Moisan Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.
2
001, 40, 3726 ± 3748.
12] D. J. Gravert, K. D. Janda, Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 489 ±
09.
13] For instance, both soluble PEG-supported- (Ref. ) and
insoluble polystyrene-supported-bisoxazolines/Cu(II)
[
[
5
References and Notes
[8]
[
1] a) U. Eder, G. Sauer, R. Wiechert, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
Engl. 1971, 10, 496 ± 497; b) Z. G. Hajos, D. R. Parrish, J.
Org. Chem. 1974, 39, 1615 ± 1621; c) P. A. Grieco, N.
Fukamiya, M. Miyashita, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun.
complexes, see: S. Orlandi, A. Mandoli, D. Pini, P.
Salvadori, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2519 ± 2521,
showed considerable decrease of catalytic efficiency
upon recovery and recycling.
1
976, 573 ± 575. For discussions on the reaction mecha-
nism see: d) C. Agami, Bull. Chem. Soc.Fr. 1988, 3, 499 ± [14] Obviously, PEG cannot be expected to exert the stereo-
07; e) D. Rajagopal, M. S. Moni, S. Subramanian, S.
directing effect of a peptide chain.
Swaminathan, Tetrahedron Asymmetry 1999, 10, 1631 ± [15] For a preliminary account of the part of this work
5
1
634.
concerning the PEG-Pro-catalyzed aldol condensation,
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2002, 344, 533 ± 542
541