4322 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 37, No. 17, 1998
Furman and Margerum
In wastewater treatment, chlorine is a widely used disinfec-
and ClO2-. The present work addresses the kinetics and
mechanism of this reaction.
tant.17 Chlorine hydrolysis (eq 7) is relatively rapid with a
-
1
18
hydrolysis rate constant of 22.3 s at 25.0 °C.
Experimental Section
+
-
Cl (aq) + H O a HOCl + H + Cl
(7)
Reagents. Solutions were made with deionized, distilled
water. Working solutions of NaOCl (ClO3 -free) were prepared
2
2
-
from a stock solution obtained by slowly bubbling Cl2(g)
through stirred solutions of NaOH (∼0.1 M) maintained at 0-4
°C. The NaOCl solutions were standardized spectrophotometri-
cally. The molar absorptivity for NaOCl was determined by
A typical range of bromide ion concentrations in groundwater
is 0.01-3 mg/L.19 Chlorine reacts extremely rapidly with Br
-
9
-1 -1
(
the rate constant is 7.7 × 10 M s ) to give BrCl(aq), which
5 -1 20
hydrolyzes rapidly (k > 10 s ) to give HOBr. The reaction
-
two methods. Iodometric titrimetric methods gave ꢀ ) 362
between HOCl and Br also is proposed to proceed through
292
-
1
-1 29
(
2 M cm . In a second method, a solution of NaNO2
BrCl, followed by rapid hydrolysis to HOBr. The rate constant
3
-1 -1 21
was added in excess to the NaOCl, and the mixture was adjusted
to pH 5 with acetic acid. After complete reaction, the solution
for the overall reaction (eq 8) is 1.55 × 10 M s .
-
-
-
was diluted and analyzed for NO3 by capillary electrophoresis
HOCl + Br f HOBr + Cl
(8)
-
(
CE) methods. The [NO3 ] determined was used to calculate
-
-1
-1
the [OCl ]. This gave 362 ( 5 M cm as the molar
absorptivity for OCl at 292 nm, in agreement with the
Mixtures of HOCl and HOBr can react to generate chlorate
ion (eq 9) or bromate ion (eq 10).22
-
iodometric method.
Commercially available NaClO2 was recrystallized by using
HOBr
-
+
-
3
0
3HOCl
8 ClO3 + 3H + 2Cl
(9)
a procedure modified from previous reports. The carbonate
content of the commercial solid (measured by CE) was removed
by precipitation with a solution of BaCl2. (Some Ba(ClO2)2
coprecipitated.) The remaining supernatant liquid was collected
and cooled in an ice bath. The NaClO2 was recrystallized in
the temperature range from -5 to -15 °C, collected by vacuum
filtration, and washed with 100% acetone. A final recrystalli-
zation step was performed on the solid from a 75:25 acetone/
water mixture. The solid was washed, and argon gas was used
to evaporate residual acetone from the final product. The
NaClO2 was stored over P2O5 in vacuo and kept in the dark.
The purity was determined by standard iodometric titrimetry,
and the product was confirmed to be free of other anionic
impurities by capillary electrophoresis. The purified NaClO2
-
-
+
2
HOCl + HOBr f BrO3 + 2Cl + 3H
(10)
Bromate ion is a carcinogen and nephrotoxin.23-28 The
Environmental Protection Agency has proposed that the maxi-
mum contaminant level (MCL) in drinking water should be less
than 0.01 mg/L, with a maximum contaminant level goal
MCLG) of no detectable BrO3 . Data on the health effects
associated with exposure to ClO3 are not complete, so chlorate
-
19
(
-
ion will not be regulated as part of the Disinfectants and
Disinfection Byproduct Proposed Rule.19 However, it is a
candidate for future regulation. On the other hand, the proposed
MCL for chlorite ion (ClO2 ) is 1.0 mg/L. Reactions between
-
-
1
-1
has a molar absorptivity of ꢀ ) 154.0 ( 0.7 M cm at 260
nm. Sodium chlorite solutions were prepared from the recrys-
tallized solid (99.98%).
mixtures of HOCl and HOBr initially produce chlorite ion and
bromide ion (eq 11).22
+
HOCl + HOBr f ClO2- + 2H Br-
Chlorine dioxide was synthesized by a process described in
a review paper by Masschelein. Acetic anhydride was added
(11)
31
to a solution of NaClO2, and argon gas was used to strip off
ClO2 from the main reaction tower. A second tower contained
a 5% solution of NaClO2 and served as a scrubber to remove
any possible Cl2 that may have formed in the process. The
ClO2 was trapped in a third gas collection tower which contained
H2O at 0-4 °C. Solutions of ClO2 were freshly diluted prior
to use. Small amounts of n-pentane were added to the solutions
to cover the surface and retard the evaporation of ClO2, as
If HOCl is in higher concentration than HOBr (which is typically
the case in water chlorination), the Br- generated is rapidly
converted back to HOBr (eq 8). As a consequence, the next
stage in the halogen redox process is the reaction between HOBr
(
17) Maxted, J. R. Proceedings Wastewater Disinfection AlterantiVes,
Design, Operation and Effectiveness Workshop Water Pollution
Control Federation, Washington, DC, 1983.
3
2
(
(
18) Wang, T. X.; Margerum, D. W. Inorg. Chem. 1994, 33, 1050-1055.
19) USEPA. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations; Disinfectants
and Disinfection Byproducts; Proposed Rule; Fed. Regist. 1994, 59,
recommended by Lengyel and co-workers. The molar ab-
sorptivity was found to be 1230 ( 10 M-1 cm-1 at 359 nm by
using standard iodometric titrimetry.
3
8668-38829.
-
-
(
20) Wang, T. X.; Kelley, M. D.; Cooper, J. N.; Beckwith, R. C.; Margerum,
Solutions of BrO3 and ClO3 were prepared from their
respective sodium salts obtained from Aldrich. Reagent purity
D. W. Inorg. Chem. 1994, 33, 5872-5878.
(
(
(
21) Kumar, K.; Margerum, D. W. Inorg. Chem. 1987, 26, 2706-2711.
22) Lewin, M.; Avrahami, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 4491-4498.
23) Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare, Cancer Research Report,
-
4+
was confirmed by standard iodometric (for BrO3 ) and Ce /
Fe (for ClO3 ) titrations.
2
+
-
1
976, pp 744-745 (Aug 1977).
Solutions of bromide-free HOBr were made by the reaction
(
(
(
24) Kurokawa, Y.; Hayashi, Y.; Maekawa, A.; Takahashi, M.; Kokubo,
T.; Odashima, S. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1983, 71, 965-982.
25) Kurokawa, Y.; Maekawa, A.; Takahashi, M.; Hayashi, Y. EnViron.
Health Perspect. 1990, 87, 309-335.
-
of HOCl with Br in a 1:1 mole ratio. An aliquot of this
solution was made basic, and the solution was standardized
spectrophotometrically based on the molar absorptivity of
26) Gosselin, R. E.; Smith, R. P.; Hodge, H. C.; Braddock, J. E. In Clinical
Toxicology of Commercial Products; Tracy, T. M., Ed.; Williams &
Wilkins Inc.: Baltimore, MD, 1984; pp II 3-4, 110-112, III 74-
-1
-1
33
NaOBr, ꢀ ) 332 M cm at 329 nm.
Under reaction
77.
(29) Beckwith, R. C.; Margerum, D. W. Unpublished results.
(
27) Budavari, S. The Merck Index; Merck & Co., Inc.: Rahway, NJ, 1989;
pp 1212-1213.
(30) Fabian, I.; Gordon, G. Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 3785-3787.
(31) Masschelein, W. J. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 1984, 76, 70-76.
(32) Lengyel, I.; Li, J.; Epstein, I. R. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 7032-
(33) 7T 0r o3 y7 ,. R. C.; Margerum, D. W. Inorg. Chem. 1991, 30, 3538-3543.
(28) Loebl, S. The Nurse’s Drug Handbook; John Wiley & Sons Inc.: New
York, 1989; pp 1164, 1166.