Mechanism of the Chlorite-Tetrathionate Reaction
al.,5 we fixed the value of k4 at their value, 1.06 × 106 M-1
noted that the otherwise sluggish chloride ion catalyzes this
reaction in another system. Here, we present further experi-
mental evidence to support those findings. Our values of k6
s-1. We also tried to fit this rate coefficient, but we
encountered strong correlation among the parameters k4, k′,
4
k5, k7, k′, k12, and k13. We therefore chose to use the value
and k′ are in reasonable agreement with our previous
7
6
of k4 found independently under the conditions that most
closely correspond to our experiments. It should also be noted
determinations under very different experimental condi-
tions.10
that the necessity of k′ in the fit suggests that the chloride
Step R7 is the initial step of the oxidation of tetrathionate
by hypochlorous acid. A second-order rate coefficient, 32
M-1 s-1, was determined for this step in alkaline medium.7
Our previous considerations12 and the experiments presented
here suggest that the rate of this reaction must depend on
the concentration of H+ as well. This fact is hidden in the
previously determined rate coefficient, since it was deter-
mined between pH 8.2 and 9.0, where the concentration of
HOCl is roughly proportional to [H+], since the pK of HOCl
is 7.40.29 We have found that this reaction is also catalyzed
by the chloride ion, and this observation can easily be
explained by the fast hydrolytic equilibrium of Cl2 (eq 5)
followed by
4
ion has a significant impact on the kinetics of the hypochlo-
rous acid-chlorite reaction. Nicoson and Margerum27 found
that chloride accelerates this reaction because of the well-
known fast equilibrium28
HOCl + Cl- + H+ h Cl2 + H2O
(5)
followed by the reaction between chlorine and the chlorite
ion, which is much faster than the corresponding hypochlo-
rous acid-chlorite reaction. They obtained a value of 5.7 ×
105 M-1 s-1 for the rate-determining step of the chlorite-
chlorine reaction. Our calculated result, k′ ) (5.03 ( 0.13)
4
× 108 M-3 s-1, gives a value of 3.1 × 105 M-1 s-1 for the
chlorite-chlorine reaction, in reasonable agreement with
Nicoson’s value,27 if one uses the widely accepted equilib-
rium constant K ) 1640 M-2 for eq 4 determined by Eigen
and Kustin.28 The agreement is even better if we use
Nicoson’s K ) 960 M-2 for the chlorine hydrolysis, which
yields 5.24 × 105 M-1 s-1 for the rate coefficient of the
chlorite-chlorine reaction.
S4O62- + Cl2 + H2O f S2O3OH- + S2O3Cl- + H+ + Cl-
(7)
Steps R8 and R9 are fast reactions, whose individual
values cannot be determined, since only their ratio affects
the final fit. Our calculations reveal that k8 has a lower limit
of 107 M-2 s-1. Fixing k8 at this value determines k9 as 1.32
× 107 M-2 s-1. These steps are crucial to the kinetic model.
They imply that chloride not only increases the rate of
consumption of chlorite by the intermediate S2O3Cl- but also
alters the stoichiometry. All attempts to unify the stoichi-
ometry by having parallel proton- and chloride-catalyzed
paths were unsuccessful. Using the stoichiometry of step R8
with H+- and Cl--catalyzed pathways increased the average
deviation to 0.0107 and introduced a systematic deviation
between the measured and calculated curves, especially
where the initial chloride concentration was varied. The
stoichiometry of step R9 with both catalyzed pathways gave
an acceptable average deviation of 0.0047, but at large
chlorite excess, the simulated curves failed to reproduce the
early phase of the kinetic curves in which the measured
absorbance rises suddenly followed by a slower, nearly linear
increase. These unsuccessful efforts were, however, helpful
in understanding why both steps R8 and R9 are needed. At
low chloride concentrations, step R8 converts S2O3Cl- and
chlorite to HOCl, transforming all the chlorine atoms
originating from the reactant chlorite into HOCl, which can
ignite the HOCl-catalyzed path to produce chlorine dioxide
sooner. If, however, the chloride concentration is sufficiently
high, then step R8 is no longer needed, and S2O3Cl- and
chlorite (in the presence of chloride) react according to step
R9, in which only half of the converted chlorine produces
HOCl (the rest is converted to chloride ion), preventing the
autocatalytic buildup of HOCl.
Emmenegger and Gordon24 suggested that step R5 ac-
companies the formation of chlorine dioxide in the reaction
between hypochlorous acid and chlorite, giving chlorate in
a separate pathway. Later this simple nucleophilic displace-
ment was rejected by Peintler and co-workers5 because they
found that the ratio of chlorine dioxide to chlorate formed
decreases with pH. If step R5 is treated as a third-order
process with rate proportional to [H+], this ratio would be
independent of pH. The pH dependence of the [ClO2]/
-
[ClO3 ] ratio can be explained, however, if step R5 is a
simple second-order process and step R4 is a third-order
process whose rate is proportional to [H+]. Instead of the
simple nucleophilic displacement, Peintler et al. suggested
the third-order process
2HOCl + ClO2- f ClO3- + Cl2 + H2O
(6)
to explain their experimental findings. We tried to replace
step R5 with reaction 6 with no success, probably because
HOCl does not accumulate to a high enough level to allow
this third-order process to dominate. The proposed role of
R5 is also supported by the fact that its elimination from
the kinetic model destroys the fit, resulting in a nearly 7-fold
increase in the average deviation to 0.0282 absorbance units.
Step R6 is the well-known fast reaction that generates
chlorine dioxide from Cl2O2. In our previous work,10 we have
(23) Taube, H.; Dodgen, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1949, 71, 3330.
(24) Emmenegger, F.; Gordon, G. Inorg. Chem. 1967, 6, 633.
(25) Aieta, E. M.; Roberts, P. X. EnViron. Sci. Technol. 1986, 20, 50.
(26) Tang, T.-F.; Gordon, G. EnViron. Sci. Technol. 1984, 18, 212.
(27) Nicoson, J. S.; Margerum, D. W. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 342.
(28) Eigen, M.; Kustin, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962, 84, 1355.
Step R10 is the well-known oxidation of S(IV) by chlorite,
(29) IUPAC Stability Constant Database; Royal Society of Chemistry:
London, 1992-1997.
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 45, No. 24, 2006 9881