PRODUCTS OF SOLVOLYSIS REACTIONS FORMING (2-PHENYLCYCLOPROPYL)CARBINYL
977
appreciably in typical solvolysis reactions that produce
REFERENCES
the (2-phenylcyclopropyl)carbinyl cation. Moreover, the
formation of alcohol 4 from cation 6 confirmed in the
present work demonstrates that detection of 4 from
enzyme-catalyzed oxidations of 1 does not provide con-
clusive evidence for a radical intermediate. Simple aryl-
substituted methylcyclopropanes might be good radical
clocks when one knows the mechanism, but they are poor
mechanistic probes if one does not. More complex probes
that clearly differentiate between radicals and cations are
better mechanistic tools.4
1. Fu H, Newcomb M, Wong C-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991; 113:
5878–5880; Liu KE, Johnson CC, Newcomb M, Lippard SJ. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1993; 115: 939–947; Atkinson JK, Ingold KU.
Biochemistry 1993; 32: 9209–9214; Atkinson JK, Hollenberg PF,
Ingold KU, Johnson CC, Le Tadic M-H, Newcomb M, Putt DA.
Biochemistry 1994; 33: 10630–10637; Zaks A, Dodds DR. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1995; 117: 10419–10424; Toy PH, Newcomb M,
Hager LP. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1998; 11: 816–823; Austin RN,
Chang HK, Zylstra GJ, Groves JT. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000; 122:
11747–11748; Toy PH, Newcomb M, Coon MJ, Vaz ADN. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998; 120: 9718–9719; Newcomb M, Hollenberg PF,
Coon MJ. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2003; 409: 72–79; Jin Y,
Lipscomb JD. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Protein Struct. Mol.
Enzym. 2000; 1543: 47–59; Newcomb M, Aebisher D, Shen R,
Chandrasena REP, Hollenberg PF, Coon MJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003; 125: 6064–6065; Chandrasena REP, Vatsis KP, Coon MJ,
Hollenberg PF, Newcomb M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004; 126: 115–
126.
EXPERIMENT
Solvolysis reactions of 10-OTs and 11-OTs. Solutions of
trans- or cis-3-phenylcyclobutanol tosylates5 (0.01 g,
0.037 mmol) in water (4 ml) with NaHCO3 (0.1 g) were
heated at reflux for 30 min. The cooled solutions were
extracted with diethyl ether (3 ꢁ 25 ml) and the ether
phase was washed with brine and dried over MgSO4.
Products were identified by GC and GC–mass spectral
comparisons with authentic compounds. GC response
factors were obtained with authentic compounds, and
yields in micromoles for each product were determined
against the internal standard 1-phenyl-1-propanol added
after the extractive work-up. Acetolysis reactions were
conducted in a similar manner in solutions of acetic acid
(4 ml) containing 0.1 g of NaOAc, which were heated at
120 ꢃC for 2–3 h. Yields in Table 1 are averages for two
determinations.
2. Newcomb M, Toy PH. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000; 33:
449–455.
3. Newcomb M, Manek MB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990; 112:
9662–9663; Newcomb M, Johnson CC, Manek MB, Varick TR.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992; 114: 10915–10921.
4. Newcomb M, Le Tadic-Biadatti MH, Chestney DL, Roberts ES,
Hollenberg PF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995; 117: 12085–12091; Choi
SY, Eaton PE, Kopp DA, Lippard SJ, Newcomb M, Shen R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1999; 121: 12198–12199; Newcomb M, Shen R, Choi
SY, Toy PH, Hollenberg PF, Vaz ADN, Coon MJ. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000; 122: 2677–2686.
5. Wiberg KB, Nelson GL. Tetrahedron Lett. 1969: 4385–4388.
6. Wiberg KB, Shobe D, Nelson GL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993; 115:
10645–10652.
7. Brazeau BJ, Austin RN, Tarr C, Groves JT, Lipscomb JD. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001; 123: 11831–11837; Auclair K, Hu Z, Little DM,
Ortiz de Montellano PR, Groves JT. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002; 124:
6020–6027.
8. Kumar D, de Visser SP, Sharma PK, Cohen S, Shaik S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004; 126: 1907–1920.
9. Shaik S, Cohen S, de Visser SP, Sharma PK, Kumar D, Kozuch S,
Ogliaro F, Danovich D. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2004; 207–226.
10. Kirmse W, Krzossa B, Steenken S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996; 118:
7473–7477.
11. Sneen RA, Lewandowski KM, Taha IAI, Smith BR. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1961; 83: 4843–4848.
Hydrolysis reactions of 9-OMs. Alcohol 9 (0.053 g,
0.36 mmol) was converted to its mesylate by reaction
with MsOCl (35 ml, 0.36 mmol) in THF (5 ml) containing
Et3N (123 ml, 0.88 mmol) at ꢂ20 ꢃC. After 1 h, the reac-
tion mixtures were poured into water (60 ml) at room
temperature. The reaction mixture was worked up and
analyzed as described above.
12. Hart DJ, Kanai K. J. Org. Chem. 1982; 47: 1555–1560.
13. Friedrich EC, Taggart DB, Saleh MA. J. Org. Chem. 1977; 42:
1437–1443.
14. Nozaki H, Takaya H, Moriuti S, Noyori R. Tetrahedron 1968; 24:
3655–3669.
15. Grummitt O, Christoph FJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951; 73: 3479–
3484.
16. Shono T, Nishiguchi I. Tetrahedron 1974; 30: 2173–2181.
17. Hermans B, Hevesi L. J. Org. Chem. 1995; 60: 6141–6147.
18. Weber WP, Felix RA, Willard AK, Koenig KE. Tetrahedron Lett.
1971; 4710–4704.
19. Newcomb M, Choi SY, Toy PH. Can. J. Chem. 1999; 77: 1123–
1135.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by a grant from the National
Institutes of Health (GM-48722).
Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2005; 18: 974–977