1766
R. de Oliveira Lopes et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 22 (2011) 1763–1766
conditions described above. After 20 h, the product was obtained in
a 97.6% conversion (SD = 0.3%) and a 98.8% ee (SD = 0.2%). These re-
sults matched the prediction model.
phase was dried (anhydrous Na2SO4), filtered, and concentrated
under vacuum. Products were analyzed by (chiral) gas chromatog-
raphy (GC), on the column Beta DEX 225 (30 m ꢁ 0.25 mm ꢁ
0.25 lm), at 130 °C (35 min). We confirmed the configuration by
using the (R)-isomer purchased from Aldrich.
3. Conclusions
In order to study the reaction conditions on the reduction of
4-bromoacetophenone by G. candidum and R. rubra, 25,6 fractional
factorial designs13 were used to evaluate five variables in 8 runs with
3 replicates of the central point. Variables and domain were:
Biomass concentration (Cell): 4–12 g dry weight/L; substrate (4-
bromoacetophenone): 1–3 g/L; pH, 4–6; glucose: 30–50 g/L; MgCl2:
0–1 g/L. Response variables were: % conversion and % ee Reactions
were carried out in 500 mL cotton plugged Erlenmeyer flasks
containing 50 mL of medium for 20 h at 30 °C and 150 rpm. After
that period, the medium was treated as described above. Statistical
analyses were performed using Statistica 6.0 (Statsoft Inc., Tulsa, OK,
USA).
A screening study of some wild fungi strains has been carried out
with different enantioselectivities in the reduction of 4-bromoace-
tophenone being obtained. The yeast G. candidum highlighted in
the production of (R)-4-bromophenylethanol and R. rubra were
selected for obtaining the other isomer, (S)-4-bromophenylethanol.
In the reduction catalyzed by G. candidum, the reaction conditions
selected by an experimental design were simpler than those used
in the initial studies and led to excellent conversions (98.9%) and
enantioselectivities (>99% ee) for the (R)-isomer. Biomass, glucose,
MgCl2, and pH were not significant parameters, which are a good
characteristic for industrial processes, while allowing some
variation of the parameters during process without affecting the
enantiomeric excess. In the 4-bromoacetophenone reduction with
R. rubra, the reaction conditions selected by the experimental design
led to a 97.6% conversion and a 98.8% ee for the (S)-4-bromopheny-
lethanol isomer. Further optimization studies could improve these
results.
Acknowledgment
Financial support from CAPES and CNPq–BRAZIL is
acknowledged.
4. Experimental
References
1. Nakamura, K.; Yamanaka, R.; Matsuda, T.; Harada, T. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2003, 14, 2659–2681.
2. Kataoka, M.; Kita, K.; Wada, M.; Yasohara, Y.; Hasegawa, J.; Shimizu, S. Appl.
Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003, 62, 437–445.
3. Yang, Y.; Zhu, D.; Piegat, T. J.; Hua, L. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2007, 18, 1799–
1803.
4. Houng, J. Y.; Liao, J. H.; Wu, J. Y.; Shen, S. C.; Hsu, H. F. Process Biochem. 2007, 42,
1–7.
Microorganisms, media, growth conditions, and biotransforma-
tion. Hansenula sp., K. marxianus, Candida sp., Pichia sp.,
G. candidum, 3 strains of S. cerevisiae, R. rubra, R. minuta and
filamentous fungi, A. niger, T. harzianum, Mucor ramannianus, and
P. chrysosporium, belong to the collection of the ‘Departamento de
Engenharia Bioquímica, Escola de Química, UFRJ’ (Cidade Univer-
sitária, CT Bloco E, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, e-mail selma@eq.ufrj.br)
and are freely available upon request. Cells were allowed to grow
for 48 h, under 150 rpm and 30 °C in a medium containing 1% glu-
cose, 0.5% yeast extract, 0.5% peptone, 0.1% (NH4)2SO4, and 0.1%
MgSO4ꢂ7H2O. After that period, they were harvested by centrifuga-
tion, re-suspended in water, and used for the reaction. After centri-
fugation, the cells (12 g/L, dried weight) were added to the
reduction’s medium containing: glucose (5%), MgCl2 (0.1%) in a final
volume of 50 mL. After 30 min of addition of the microorganisms,
the substrate (50 mg diluted in 1 mL of ethanol 96%) was added
to the medium. The reaction was carried out in 500 mL cotton
plugged Erlenmeyer flasks for 24 h at 30 °C and 150 rpm. After
24 h, the medium was centrifuged again to separate the cells and
the liquid phase was extracted with ethyl acetate. The organic
5. Kurbanoglu, E. B.; Zilbeyaz, K.; Ozdal, M.; Taskin, M.; Kurbanoglu, N. I.
Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 3825–3829.
6. Zilbeyaz, K.; Kurbanoglu, E. B. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 1549–1552.
7. Abas, F. Z.; Uzir, M. H.; Zahar, M. H. M. J. Appl. Sci. 2010, 10, 3289–3294.
8. Ramos, A. S.; Ribeiro, J. B.; Vazquez, L.; Fiaux, S. B.; Leite, S. G. F.; Ramos, M. C. K.
V.; Aquino Neto, F. R.; Antunes, O. A. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 7362–7364.
9. Ribeiro, J. B.; Ramos, A. S.; Fiaux, S. B.; Leite, S. G. F.; Ramos, M. C. K. V.; Aquino
Neto, F. R.; Antunes, O. A. C. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2009, 20, 2263–2266.
10. Kurbanoglu, E. B.; Zilbeyaz, K.; Kurbanoglu, N. I.; Kilic, H. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2007, 18, 1159–1162.
11. Ribeiro, J. B.; Ramos, M. C. K. V.; Aquino Neto, F. R.; Leite, S. G. F.; Antunes, O. A.
C. J. Mol. Catalysis B: Enzimatic. 2003, 24–25, 121–124.
12. Nakamura, K.; Matsuda, T.; Ohno, A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1996, 7, 3021–
3024.
13. Logothetis, N. Managing for Total Quality—From Deming to Taguchi and SPC;
Prentice Hall International Ltd: London, 1992.
14. Lundstedt, T.; Seifert, E.; Abramo, L.; Thelin, B.; Nyström, A.; Pettersen, J.;
Bergman, R. Chemometrics Intelligent Lab. Systems 1998, 42, 3–40.