6816
Mikhaylichenko et al.: Unimolecular decomposition of NO3
13
´
NO rotational excitation is modest and the distributions
are insensitive to the excitation photon energy. Vibrational
A. Delon, P. Dupre, and R. Jost, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 9482 ͑1993͒.
14 L. Valachovic, C. Riehn, K. Mikhaylichenko, and C. Wittig, Chem. Phys.
Lett. ͑in press͒.
excitation is also modest: ϭ 1 / ϭ 0 ϳ 0.1. There is a
͓v
͔ ͓v
͔
15 A. Weaver, D. W. Arnold, S. E. Bradforth, and D. M. Neumark, J. Chem.
Phys. 94, 1740 ͑1991͒.
Ϫ
g
3
high degree of O2 internal excitation, with the X
͚
ground
state produced throughout the entire photolysis region, in
agreement with results from previous measurements of c.m.
translational energy distributions.24 A significant fraction ͑at
least one-third͒ of the O2 is formed with internal energies
16 E. Hirota, K. Kawaguchi, T. Ishiwata, and I. Tanaka, J. Chem. Phys. 95,
771 ͑1991͒; T. Ishiwata, I. Tanaka, K. Kawaguchi, and E. Hirota, ibid. 82,
2196 ͑1985͒.
17 K. Kawaguchi, E. Hirota, T. Ishiwata, and I. Tanaka, J. Chem. Phys. 93,
951 ͑1990͒.
1
18
¨
below the a ⌬g threshold, and it is assumed that excitation
M. Mayer, L. S. Cederbaum, and H. Koppel, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 899
Ϫ
3
͑1994͒.
within X ͚g is predominantly vibrational as opposed to ro-
19
¨
E. Haller, H. Koppel, and L. S. Cederbaum, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 1359
Ϫ
g
3
tational. The distribution within X
͚
indicates a popula-
͑1983͒.
20 See, for example, D. W. Noid, M. L. Koszykowski, and R. A. Marcus,
Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 32, 267 ͑1981͒; E. B. Stechel and E. J. Heller,
ibid. 35, 563 ͑1984͒; V. E. Bondybey, ibid. 35, 591 ͑1984͒.
tion inversion which can be rationalized as due to the geom-
etry of the 3-center transition state.
1
If O2(a ⌬g) is not produced, the most populous
21 The density of vibrational states in the ground PES near the 2E origin
Ј
Ϫ
3
X
͚
vibrational levels are ϳ ϭ6 or 7 for the photolysis
v
g
was obtained by direct harmonic count using the ground state vibrational
frequencies from Ref. 8.
region 16 860–17 080 cmϪ1. It is important to keep in mind
that the measurements do not distinguish between low-lying
22 G. Herzberg, Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure. III. Electronic
Spectra and Electronic Structure of Polyatomic Molecules ͑Krieger, Mala-
bar, 1991͒.
1
vibrational levels within a ⌬gand high vibrational levels of
3
X
X
͚
͚
Ϫ . Nonetheless, there is a good possibility that
23 K. P. Huber and G. Herzberg, Molecular Spectra and Molecular Struc-
ture. IV. Constants of Diatomic Molecules ͑Van Nostrand Reinhold, New
York, 1979͒.
g
Ϫ
3
is the dominant O2 species. For example, Smith
g
et al.48 report that O2 from the OϩNO2→NOϩO2 reaction is
24 W. H. Miller, Chem. Rev. 87, 19 ͑1987͒.
formed in vibrational levels whose populations decrease
25 Y. S. Choi and C. B. Moore, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 1010 ͑1992͒.
26 H. F. Davis, B. Kim, H. S. Johnson, and Y. T. Lee, J. Phys. Chem. 97,
2172 ͑1993͒.
monotonically from ϭ6 to ϭ11. The O internal energy
v
v
2
distribution ͑see Fig. 10͒ also decreases monotonically over
Ϫ
27 D. W. Kohn, H. Clauberg, and P. Chen, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63, 4003
͑1992͒.
3
this range, further supporting O2(X ͚g ) as a major ͑if not
dominant͒ O2 species.
28 R. E. Smalley, L. Wharton, and D. H. Levy, J. Chem. Phys. 63, 4977
Above the OϩNO2 threshold, reaction ͑2͒ dominates.
͑1975͒.
Though 2E is believed to correlate without a barrier to
29
Ј
¨
E. Bohmer, S. K. Shin, Y. Chen, and C. Wittig, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 2536
͑1992͒.
ground state products, unimolecular reaction exclusively on
30 A. Sanov, C. R. Bieler, and H. Reisler, J. Phys. Chem. 99, 13637 ͑1995͒.
31 H. Ni, J. M. Serafin, and J. J. Valentini, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 2259 ͑1996͒.
32 R. C. Hilborn, Am. J. Phys. 50, 982 ͑1982͒.
2E is not fast enough to bypass internal conversion. Specifi-
Ј
cally, the estimated k2 value is an order of magnitude smaller
than the radiationless decay rate of 1013 sϪ1 inferred from the
33 H. Okabe, Photochemistry of Small Molecules ͑Wiley-Interscience, New
York, 1978͒.
2
LIF spectrum of the 2E ← AЈ origin. Therefore, several sur-
Ј
2
34 A number of vibronic level densities have potential relevance for the
faces may contribute. It is a daunting task to establish the
2
2E ← AЈ origin region. First, consider all levels of E vibronic symmetry
Ј
Ј
2
respective roles of the different PESs involved in reaction
͑2͒.
having one quantum of or excitation. In this case, ϳ5/cmϪ1. Ac-
3
4
cording to PJT selection rules, these should have the largest coupling
matrix elements with the 2E bright state. Alternatively, counting all lev-
Ј
els having E vibronic symmetry yields ϳ20/cmϪ1, which can be com-
Ј
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
pared to ϳ100/cmϪ1 for all levels within the 2A2Ј electronic state irre-
We thank D. Arnold, P. Ionov, I. Bezel, H. Reisler, I. W.
M. Smith, and F. Davis for valuable input.
spective of vibronic symmetry. The similarity between the density of PJT-
promoting-mode levels and the density of mixed levels estimated from the
oscillator strength dilution factor is noteworthy. However, this may be
fortuitous. For example, since measurements of fl values in excess of 100
s are difficult, it is possible that the zero-pressure lifetimes extend even
to the millisecond regime.
1 J. F. Noxon, R. B. Norton, and W. R. Henderson, Geophys. Res. Lett. 5,
675 ͑1978͒.
35 I. B. Bersuker and V. Z. Polinger, Vibronic Interactions in Molecules and
Crystals ͑Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989͒.
2 U. Platt, D. Perner, A. M. Winer, G. W. Harris, and J. N. Pitts, Jr.,
Geophys. Res. Lett. 7, 89 ͑1980͒.
36 T. A. Brody, J. Flores, J. B. French, P. A. Mello, A. Pandey, and S. S. M.
Wong, Rev. Mod. Phys. 53, 385 ͑1981͒.
3 R. A. Graham and H. S. Johnston, J. Phys. Chem. 82, 254 ͑1978͒.
4 R. P. Wayne et al., in The Nitrate Radical: Physics, Chemistry, and the
Atmosphere, Atmospheric Environment Vol. 25A, edited by R. P. Wayne
͑Pergamon, Oxford, 1991͒, pp. 1–206.
37 R. Georges, A. Delon, and R. Jost, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 1732 ͑1995͒.
38 Each of the optically prepared molecular eigenstates contains a large per-
centage of ground electronic state character as per the oscillator strength
5 S. P. Sander, J. Phys. Chem. 90, 4135 ͑1986͒.
6 R. J. Yokelson, J. B. Burkholder, R. W. Fox, R. K. Talukdar, and A. R.
Ravishankara, J. Phys. Chem. 98, 13144 ͑1994͒.
dilution factor.
39
´
See, for example, V. I. Kukulin, K. M. Krasnopolsky, and J. Horacek,
7 H. H. Nelson, L. Pasternack, and J. R. McDonald, J. Phys. Chem. 87,
1286 ͑1983͒.
Theory of Resonances: Principals and Applications ͑Kluwer, Dordrecht,
1989͒; J. A. Beswick and J. Jortner, Adv. Chem. Phys. 47, 363
8 B. Kim, P. L. Hunter, and H. S. Johnston, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 4057 ͑1992͒.
9 A. E. Douglas, J. Chem. Phys. 45, 1007 ͑1996͒.
͑1981͒.
40 P. J. Robinson and K. A. Holbrook, Unimolecular Reactions ͑Wiley, New
10 H. H. Nelson, L. Pasternack, and J. R. McDonald, J. Chem. Phys. 79,
York, 1972͒.
4279 ͑1983͒.
41 W. Forst, Theory of Unimolecular Reactions ͑Academic, New York,
11
¨
H. Koppel, W. Domcke, and L. S. Cederbaum, Adv. Chem. Phys. 57, 59
1973͒.
͑1984͒.
42 W. H. Green, C. B. Moore, and W. F. Polik, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 43,
591 ͑1992͒.
12 A. Delon, R. Georges, and R. Jost, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 7740 ͑1995͒.
J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 105, No. 16, 22 October 1996
137.222.114.240 On: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 11:38:45