6529
J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 115, No. 14, 8 October 2001
k(E,J) for the dissociation of NO2. I
effect is not averaged out. However, we do not see large
disappearing molecules instead of the forming products, non-
exponential time profiles become manifest. In the presence
of lifetime fluctuations, broad spectral distributions from the
excitation light, and of broad thermal rotational distributions,
the deconvolution of the experimental profiles is a problem.
A simulation starting from a plausible set of k(E,J) calcula-
tions with subsequent convolutions and comparison with the
experiments then provides the logical approach.
By studying broader distributions, we obtained a series
of results which are consistent with the J-resolved results
from Wittig and co-workers.20,22,23 We could demonstrate
that, at a given total energy E, the measured k(E,J) decrease
with increasing J. This is in line with predictions form sta-
tistical unimolecular rate theory. A more quantitative theoret-
ical analysis of the J-dependence is given in Part III of this
series.31 This analysis also demonstrates that the apparent
lack of a rotational influence on k(E,J) observed in Refs. 22
and 23 can be, at least in part, due to the compensation of
two effects, i.e., the increase of k(E,J) for a given J with
increasing total E and the decrease of k(E,J) for a given
total E with increasing J. As shown in Part III, the statistical
theory in this way explains the results from Refs. 22 and 23
for JϾ10 ͑see data in Fig. 9͒. However, it does not account
for results at smaller J near to threshold ͑see the discussion
in Ref. 31͒.
differences ͓between k(E,JϷ0) and k(E,JϾ0) ͔ at
͗
͘
͗
͘
larger excess energies anymore. Also, there appears to be no
large difference between the average rate constants for J
͗ ͘
Ϸ10 as opposed to J Ϸ0 at all energies ͑at constant total
͗ ͘
internal energy ͗E͒͘.
The representation of Fig. 9 also contains J-resolved re-
sults from Refs. 20 and 23. In the following, we will show
that these data, when plotted in the way of Fig. 9, follow the
same trends as found in the present work. In addition to the
data from this work, Fig. 9͑b͒ contains rotationally resolved
data from Ref. 23, from two vibrational progressions for
which the excess energy is E ϪD ϭ10 cmϪ1ϩErot(101)
͗ ͘
0
and E ϪD ϭ75 cmϪ1ϩErot(101) ͓D0 denotes the disso-
͗ ͘
0
ciation energy for Jϭ0 and Erot(101) the rotational energy
of the intermediate 101 combination vibration͔ and data for
Jϳ0. Looking at the values of the J-resolved data alone, one
may be tempted to conclude that there is no effect on the
specific rate constant when changing J. However, when com-
paring rate constants for JϾ0 and for Jϳ0 in Fig. 9͑b͒ a
pronounced deviation of the two sets of data with increasing
J is obvious and clearly visible. Under isoenergetic condi-
tions, i.e., for constant Etot here, the rates for Jϳ0 and J
Ͼ0 appear to deviate for larger rotational excitation. Appar-
ently, the rates for rotating molecules remain below the rates
for nonrotating molecules with Jϳ0. This is clearly observ-
able for Nϭ11–15 in Fig. 9͑b͒. It is interesting to note that
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
the ratio of the rates for Jϳ0 and Nϭ15 ͑e.g., in the E
͗ ͘
ϪD0ϭ75 cmϪ1ϩErot(101) progression͒ is about a factor of
The authors enjoyed stimulating discussions of this
work with R. Schinke, S. Grebenshchikov, V. Ushakov,
A. Maergoiz, and C. Wittig. Financial support from the
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft ͑SFB 357 ‘‘Molekulare
Mechanismen Unimolekularer Prozesse’’͒ is gratefully ac-
knowledged. The authors also thank G. Thurau for valuable
assistance with the experimental set up.
two. Our experiments with J ϭ20 and Jmaxϭ16 actually
͗ ͘
seem to complement these data and appear to be consistent
with them. In contrast to the conclusions of Ref. 23, we
conclude that for higher J the experimental findings may be
consistent with predictions from statistical theory. However,
at the same time Fig. 9͑b͒ also shows, that for constant total
energy E, the rates for lower angular momentum N are very
1 J. Troe, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 73, 144 ͑1969͒.
2 J. Troe, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 73, 906 ͑1969͒.
3 H. Gaedke and J. Troe, Z. Naturforsch. A 25A, 789 ͑1970͒.
4 H. Gaedke and J. Troe, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 79, 184 ͑1975͒.
5 H. Gaedke, H. Hippler, and J. Troe, Chem. Phys. Lett. 16, 177 ͑1972͒.
6 M. Quack and J. Troe, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 78, 240 ͑1974͒.
7 G. E. Busch and K. R. Wilson, J. Chem. Phys. 56, 3638 ͑1972͒.
8 G. E. Busch and K. R. Wilson, J. Chem. Phys. 56, 3655 ͑1972͒.
9 M. Quack and J. Troe, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 79, 469 ͑1975͒.
10 M. Mons and I. Dimicoli, Chem. Phys. 130, 307 ͑1989͒.
11 S. Reid and H. Reisler, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 474 ͑1996͒.
12 S. A. Reid and H. Reisler, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 5683 ͑1994͒.
13 J. Miyawaki, K. Yamanouchi, and S. Tsuchiya, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 254
͑1993͒.
close to k( E ,Jϳ0) and show no large dependence on N.
͗ ͘
At this stage it is difficult to speculate about possible reasons
for this behavior. Wittig et al. have attributed this effect to
incomplete K-mixing and a pronounced role of intramolecu-
lar Coriolis coupling for the low J decomposition of the
molecule.23
A somewhat surprising experimental result of the studies
from Ref. 23 is that specific rate constants with Nϭ1, be-
longing to two vibrational progressions with vibrational ex-
cess energies of 10 and 75 cmϪ1, are about the same for low
J. This result is correlated with the energy dependence of
specific rate constants rather than its rotational dependence.
If confirmed experimentally, this observation may indicate
that rate fluctuations for different J around an average are
significant and may compensate the energy dependence of
k(E,J) in this particular case.
14 U. Robra, H. Zacharias, and K. H. Welge, Z. Phys. D: At., Mol. Clusters
16, 175 ͑1990͒.
15 J. A. Mueller, S. A. Rogers, and P. L. Houston, J. Phys. Chem. A 102,
9666 ͑1998͒.
16 T. J. Butenhoff and E. A. Rohlfing, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5469 ͑1993͒.
17 T. J. Butenhoff and E. A. Rohlfing, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5460 ͑1993͒.
18 B. Abel, H. H. Hamann, and N. Lange, Faraday Discuss. 102, 147 ͑1995͒.
19 I. Bezel, D. Stolyarov, and C. Wittig, J. Phys. Chem. 103, 10268 ͑1999͒.
20 S. I. Ionov, G. A. Bruckner, C. Jaques, Y. Chen, and C. Wittig, J. Chem.
Phys. 99, 3420 ͑1993͒.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
We have demonstrated that the rotational dependence of
specific rate constants k(E,J) of unimolecular bond fission
reactions not only can be monitored in J-resolving experi-
ments, but also by comparing experiments with different,
well-defined thermal rotational distributions. Detecting the
21 S. I. Ionov, H. F. Davis, K. Mikhaiylichenko, L. Valachovic, R. A.
Beaudet, and C. Wittig, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 4809 ͑1994͒.
22 P. I. Ionov, I. Bezel, S. I. Ionov, and C. Wittig, Chem. Phys. Lett. 272, 257
͑1997͒.
23 I. Bezel, P. Ionov, and C. Wittig, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 9267 ͑1999͒.
205.170.15.174 On: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 02:39:44