10.1002/cctc.202000818
ChemCatChem
FULL PAPER
27Al and 29Si nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements were
carried on the Bruker Avance III 400 spectrometer.27 Al chemical shift and
29Si chemical shift were referred to Al(NO3)3 of 1 mol/L and Kaolin,
respectively. And the 27Al NMR and 29Si NMR data were recorded with a
Keywords: one-pot hydrothermal method • Cu/SAPO-34 •
selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 • cupric citrate • high
hydrothermal stability
spinning rate of 12 kHz and
6 kHz, respectively. Temperature
[1] a) M. Kampa, E. Castanas, Environ. Pollution 2008, 151, 362-367. b) S.
Lal, R.S. PATIL, Environ. Monit. Assess. 2001, 68, 37-50. c) E. Anyanwu,
Environ. Health 1999, 14, 169-185.
programmed desorption of ammonia (NH3-TPD) curves were monitored
on TP5080 (Tianjin XQ) with TCD. The catalyst (0.100g) was transferred
into the tube, pre-treated at 300 oC with He to remove the physically
adsorbed water and other gases on the catalysts. And then it cooled
down to 100 oC to adsorb NH3 for 30 min. Finally, the temperature was
increased from 100 oC to 700 oC at a rate of 10 oC /min to record the
desorption curve.
[2] H.T. Hug, A. Mayer, A. Hartenstein, SAE Technol. 1993, 3, 1-5.
[3] a) W. Held, A. König, T. Richter, L. Puppe, J. Fuels & Lubr. 1990, 99, 209-
216. b) K. Shimizu, A. Satsuma, T. Hattori, Catal. Surv. Jpn. 2000, 4, 115-
123. c) G. Busca, M.A. Larrubia, L. Arrighi, G. Ramis, Catal. Today 2005,
108, 139-148.
[4] a) Y. Li, L. Li, J.H. Yu, Chem 2017, 3, 928-949. b) S.S.R. Putluru, A.
Riisager, R. Fehrmann, Appl. Catal. B 2010, 97, 333-339.
In situ diffuse reflection infrared Fourier transform spectroscopies
(DRIFTS) were measured on Thermo Nicolet 6700 with MCT detector
cooled by the liquid N2. At the first, the catalyst was placed into the IR cell
(Harrick) meanwhile the temperature was increased to 300 oC and kept
for 1 h with N2 sweeping. After that the temperature was maintained at
200 oC to collect the background. All the data were recorded by collecting
32 scans at 4 cm−1 resolution in the whole test regions (650-4000 cm-1).
The test conditions were as follows: 1000 ppm NO, 1000 ppm NH3, 3%
O2, N2 as balance gas, and the total flow rate was kept at 200 mL min-1.
[5] a) M. Iwamoto, H. Furukawa, Y. Mine, F. Uemura, S. Mikuriya, S. Kagawa,
Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1986, 1272-1273. b) P.N.R. Vennestrøm,
T.V.W. Janssens, A. Kustov, M. Grill, A. Puig-Molina, L.F. Lundegaard, R.
Tiruvalam, P. Concepción, A. Corma, J. Catal. 2014, 309, 477-490. c) L.
Chen, X.X. Wang, Q.L. Cong, H.Y. Ma, S.J. Li, W. Li, Chem. Eng. J. 2019,
369, 957-967. d) O. Mihai, C.R. Widyastuti, S. Andonova, K.
Kamasamudram, J.H. Li, S.Y. Joshi, N.W. Currier, A. Yezerets, L. Olsson,
J. Catal. 2014, 311, 170-181. e) C. Peng, J. Liang, H.G. Peng, R. Yan,
W.M. Liu, Z. Wang, P. Wu, X. Wang. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 44,
14967-14976.
NH3-SCR performances were measured on the fixed-bed quartz tubular
flow reactor. The reaction gas consists of 1000 ppm NO, 1000 ppm NH3,
5% O2, 10% H2O (if used) and N2 as the balance. The total gas flow rate
was controlled at 200 mL min-1, which is equivalent to a gas hourly space
velocity (GHSV) of 40,000 h-1. The concentrations of the outlet gas were
monitored by Nicolet 6700 which was equipped with a gas cell (PIKE, 2.4
m). At each testing temperature, the reaction was stable for at least 30
min before collecting data. To investigate the effect of hydrothermal
treatment on activity, the catalyst was also treated at high temperature
(700 oC, 12 h) and low temperature (80 oC, 24 h) in the fixed-bed reactor
in the presence of water vapor was 10%, respectively. After the
treatment, the catalyst was heated at 600 oC under N2 to eliminate the
adsorbed H2O. The conversion of NO and the selectivity of N2 were
[6] a) J. Wang, D.Q. Fan, T. Yu, J.Q. Wang, T. Hao, X.Q. Hu, M.Q. Shen, W.
Li, J. Catal. 2015, 322, 84-90. b) R. Martínez-Franco, M. Moliner, P.
Concepcion, J.R. Thogersen, A. Corma, J. Catal. 2014, 314, 73-82. c) K.P.
Xie, J.W. Woo, D. Bernin, A. Kumar, K. Kamasamudram, L. Olsson, Appl.
Catal. B 2019, 241, 205-216. d) A.M. Beale, I. Lezcano-Gonzalez, W.A.
Slawinskic, D.S. Wraggc, Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 1667-1678. d) J.
Fan, P. Ning, Y.C. Wang, Z.X. Song, X. Liu, H.M. Wang, J. Wang, L.Y.
Wang, Q.L. Zhang, Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 369, 908-919.
[7] R. Martínez-Franco, M. Moliner, C. Francha, A. Kustov, A. Corma, Appl.
Catal. B 2012, 127, 273-280.
[8] L.M. Ren, L.F. Zhu, C.G. Yang, Y.M. Chen, Q. Sun, H.Y. Zhang, C.J. Li, F.
Nawaz, X.J. Meng, F.S. Xiao, Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 9789-9791.
[9] L. Zhang, Q.M. Wu, X.J. Meng, U. Müller, M. Feyen, D. Dai, S. Maurer,
R.M. Guire, A. Moini, A.N. Parvulescu, W.P. Zhang, C. Shi, T. Yokoi, X.L.
Pan, X.H. Bao, H. Gies, B. Marler, Dirk E. De Vos, U. Kolb, F.S. Xiao,
React. Chem. Eng. 2019, 4, 975-985.
calculated
by
the
expressions
(1)
and
(2):
[NO]in − [NO]out
NO conversion =
× 100%
(1)
[NO]in
[10] a) L.J. Xie, F.D. Liu, L.M. Ren, X.Y. Shi, F.S. Xiao, H. He, Environ. Sci.
Technol. 2014, 48, 566-572. b) L.J. Xie, F.D. Liu, X.Y. Shi, F.S. Xiao, H.
He, Appl. Catal. B 2015, 179, 202-206.
[NO2]out + 2 × [N2O]out
N2 selectivity = (1 −
) × 100% (2)
[NO]in + [NH3]in − [NO]out − [NH3]out
[11] U. Deka, I.L. Gonzalez, S.J. Warrender, A.L. Picone, P.A. Wright, B.M.
Weckhuysen, A.M. Beale, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2013, 166, 144-152.
[12] R. Li, P.Q. Wang, S.B. Ma, F.L. Yuan, Z.B. Li, Y.J. Zhu, Chem. Eng. J.
2020, 379, 122376-122377.
The [NO]in and [NH3]in represent the concentrations of inlet gas for NO
and NH3, respectively; while [NO]out, [NH3]out [N2O]out and [NO2]out denote
the outlet gas concentrations of NO, NH3, N2O, NO2, respectively.
[13] J.X. Liu, F.H. Yu, J. Liu, Y.C. Wei, Q.Y. Sun. J. Environ. Sci. 2016, 48, 45-
58.
The oxidations of NH3 were measured on the fixed-bed quartz tubular
flow reactor. The reaction gas consists of 1000 ppm NH3, 5% O2, and N2
as the balance. The total gas flow rate was controlled at 200 mL min-1;
the concentrations of the outlet NH3 were monitored by Nicolet 6700. The
conversion of NH3 was calculated by the expression (3)
[14] a) L.P. Han, M. Gao, J.Y. Hasegawa, S.X. Li, Y.J. Shen, H.R. Li, L.Y. Shi,
D.S. Zhang. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 6462-6473. b) R. Yan, S.X.
Lin, Y.L. Li, W.M. Liu, Y.Y. Mi, C.J. Tang, L. Wang, P. Wu, H.G. Peng. J.
Hazard. Mater. 2020, 396, 122592.
[15] J.M. Ramallo-López, L.B. Gutierrez, A.G. Bibiloni, F.G. Requejo, E.E.
Miró, Catal. Lett. 2002, 82, 131-139.
[16] B.H. Chen, R.N. Xu, R.D. Zhang, N. Liu, Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 23,
13909-13916.
[NH3]in - [NH3]
NHꢀ conversion =
out ×100%
(3)
[NH3]in
[17] a) X.M. Guo, D.S. Mao, S. Wang, G.S. Wu, G.Z. Lu, Catal. Commun.
2009, 10, 1661-1664. b) J. Baneshi, M. Haghighi, N. Jodeiri, M.
Abdollahifar, H. Ajamein, Energy Convers. Manage. 2014, 87, 928-937.
[18] a) S. Ali, L.Q. Chen, F.L. Yuan, R. Li, T.R. Zhang, S.H. Bakhtiar, X.S.
Leng, X.Y. Niu, Y.J. Zhu, Appl. Catal. B 2017, 210, 223-234. b) S. Ali, L.Q.
Chen, Z.B. Li, T.R. Zhang, R. Li, S.H. Bakhtiar, X.S. Leng, F.L. Yuan, X.Y.
Niu, Y.J. Zhu, Appl. Catal. B 2018, 236, 25-35. c) S.B. Ma, X.Y. Zhao, Y.S.
Li, T.R. Zhang, F.L. Yuan, X.Y. Niu, Y.J. Zhu, Appl. Catal. B 2019, 248,
226-238.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by Harbin science and technology
innovation talent fund (Outstanding academic leader project)
(RC2016XK015004).
[19] C.D. Yan, H. Cheng, Z.S. Yuan, S.D Wang, Environ. Technol. 2015, 36,
169-177.
7
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.