1594 J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 105, No. 9, 2001
Roehl et al.
Nitric acid was prepared by collecting the vacuum distillate
of a 50:50 by volume mixture of 95% H2SO4 with NaNO3. The
HNO3 was maintained at 0 °C by placing the sample in an ice
bath. Peroxynitric acid was synthesized by the reaction of H2O2
(>90%) with NO2BF4 using the procedure described by Kenley
et al.19 90% H2O2 was prepared by a vacuum distillation of
70% Semiconductor Grade H2O2 (FMC Corporation), and gravi-
metric techniques were used to verify the percent composition.
of sample age, and new PNA samples were produced when the
measured PNA vapor pressure dropped by 50%. Since H2O2
photolysis at 248 nm has no effect on the NO2 signal, the
primary effect of H2O2 impurity is to introduce a small error in
the determination of [PNA].
After further dilution, the concentration ranges of photolyte
in the PNA and HNO3 photolysis experiments were (1-43) ×
1013 cm3 and (2-23) × 1014 cm3, respectively.
The PNA synthesis method of Kenley et al. produces several
impurities that must be removed and/or quantified by careful
analysis before use in photodissociation experiments. The spectra
of a number of different PNA samples were obtained off-line
from the photodissociation experiment using mid-infrared
Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and near-infrared long-path
absorption/diode array spectrometer techniques. PNA funda-
mental vibrational bands (V2-V7) as well as bands from HNO3,
SiF4, H2O2, H2O, and NO2 impurities were identified in the mid-
IR spectra, and HNO3, H2O2, H2O overtone bands, and NO2
electronic bands were identified in the near-IR spectra.15
Compositions of the samples were determined using literature
values of cross sections and band strengths for both spectral
regions.15,20,21 The dependence of the impurity levels as a
function of the PNA sample age has been discussed by Li et
al.22 and Zhang et al.,15 who found that both NO2 and HNO3
decreased with time due to fractional distillation. In the present
work it was found that the ratio [PNA]/[HNO3] was ∼10-33
while the ratio [PNA]/[H2O2] ranged from ∼0.5 to 5. The NO2
band centered near 1600 cm-1 was observed in spectra of freshly
made samples, but decreased rapidly after several minutes of
bubbling. No attempt was made to quantify this impurity. The
SiF4 and H2O impurities were not quantified since they do not
absorb in the 210-250 nm spectral region and hence could not
interfere with the on-line UV absorption measurements (dis-
cussed below), nor do they interfere with the quantum yield
determinations.
Computational Methods
The ground state of HO2NO2 was optimized at the CCSD(T)
level of theory24 with the cc-pVDZ basis set.25 At the optimized
geometry of the ground state, the vertical excitation energies
for the lowest two singlet excited states, 21A and 31A, and the
lowest two triplet excited states, 13A and 23A, are calculated at
the complete active space self-consistent field (CASSCF)26,27
and multireference internally contracted configuration interaction
(MRCI)28,29 level of theory with the cc-pVDZ basis set. The
potential energy curves for the 11A, 21A, and 31A states are
calcualated at the CASSCF level of theory with the cc-pVDZ
basis set along the RO-O′′, RO′′-N, and RN-O′ coordinates,
separately, while fixing other parameters at their equilibrium
values of the ground state (see Figure 4 for coordinate
nomenclature). Some calculations were also carried out for the
potentials along the RO-O′′ coordinate using the aug-cc-pVDZ
basis set which inclues diffuse functions. Inclusion of the diffuse
functions did not change the resulting potential surfaces
significantly.
The active space used for the CASSCF calculation in this
work is (16e,11mo), which includes eight doubly occupied
molecular orbitals and three virtual molecular orbitals. The size
of the CAS in this active space is 9075 CSFs (configuration
state functions) for the singlet states and 13 068 CSFs for the
triplet states.
Concentrations of PNA and HNO3 in the photolysis cell were
determined immediately before and/or after every photolysis
experiment by passing the gas flows through parallel 5 and 30
cm long UV absorption cells upstream of the photolysis cell.
UV absorption measurements were made at two wavelengths,
214 nm (Zn lamp, 5 cm cell) and 254 nm (Hg Pen Ray lamp,
30 cm cell), and then were used along with calibrated flow rates
and the Beer-Lambert law to calculate vapor concentrations
in the photolysis cell. Vapor concentrations obtained at the two
wavelengths were compared and averaged. In the HNO3
photolysis experiments, vapor pressures inferred from the
photometric measurements were always within several percent
of each other and typically in the range of 13.5-14.5 Torr, in
excellent agreement with known vapor pressures for pure HNO3
at 0 °C.23 In the PNA photolysis experiments, the photometric
measurements provided a way to measure the fractional impurity
of HNO3. This is possible because there is a significant
Results
Temporal fluorescence data following the photolysis of PNA
and HNO3 were collected over a range of concentrations,
pressures, and flow rates in 10 µs bins. Background noise from
cell and filter fluorescence induced by the excimer laser, which
decays more rapidly than the LIF signal, was easily deduced
from data collected between probe pulses and was subtracted
from these raw data. The residual LIF signal consisted of (1)
NO2 generated from PNA or HNO3 photolysis, (2) NO2 from
PNA or HNO3 decomposition, and (3) probe laser scatter
through the optical and chemical filters. These temporal profiles
were collected until the NO2 photoproduct completely left the
detection viewing zone, at which time the LIF signal was
constant and solely resulted from processes 2 and 3 above. The
fluorescence signal from the PNA photofragment was calculated
by subtracting this constant background signal. Typical curves
generated from the photolysis of PNA for 3.0, 7.0, and 10.0
Torr total pressure are illustrated in parts a, b, and c, respectively,
of Figure 2. Similar plots were obtained for HNO3 photolysis
in experiments performed immediately before or after the PNA
measurements.
difference in the ratio σλPNA/σHλ NO at λ ) 254 and 214 nm (the
3
values are 18 and 4.1, respectively). It was found that the vapor
pressure of the PNA samples varied over the range 0.3-1.0
Torr depending on the age of the sample. Differences in the
PNA concentrations obtained at the two wavelengths were
usually less than 10%, and samples with concentrations differing
by more than 20% (implying a significant HNO3 impurity) were
discarded. Unlike HNO3, the H2O2 impurity in the PNA sample
could not be checked in the on-line UV absorption cells because
The temporal fluorescence signals such as those shown in
Figure 2 are proportional to the NO2 concentrations present at
a particular time after the photolysis pulse and can be related
to the NO2 quantum yield (from PNA or HNO3 photolysis) by
the following equation:
the ratio σλPNA/σHλ O does not differ significantly between 254
2
and 214 nm (5.42 and 5.8, respectively). The infrared spectra
[NO2]i ) ΛφNi O (λphoto)[i]σi(λphoto
)
(2)
2
provided a means for estimating the H2O2 impurity as a function