858 J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 106, No. 6, 2002
Letters
on experimental conditions. In addition, the unimolecular life-
time of HOONO has to be quantified before the [HOONO]/
[HNO3] ratio obtained here for a fixed time delay (0.3 s)
between mixing and observation can be related to the actual
branching ratio k1b/k1a. We are presently in a process of
modifying our apparatus to make it suitable for flow tube
kinetics experiments, both to put the preliminary measurements
described here on a more quantitative basis and to investigate
the chemistry of HOONO in more detail.
In summary, this Letter presents the first observation of a
gas-phase spectrum of HOONO, a structural isomer of nitric
acid that has long eluded experimentalists. Although a complete
vibrational analysis of the spectrum is not feasible at the present
time, both the number of the observed bands and their positions
are consistent with the available spectroscopic information on
this molecule. We have shown that the fraction of HOONO
produced in the association reaction of OH with NO2 is relatively
small, of the order of a few percent. It remains to be seen
whether this product channel becomes more significant at lower
temperatures and higher pressures. From an experimental
kinetics perspective, the successful observation of HOONO by
photodissociation spectroscopy under ambient temperature
conditions opens the door to many interesting experiments on
reactions involving weakly bound adducts such as, for example,
ROONO and RO2-H2O (R ) organic radical).
Figure 3. Kinetic traces of OH produced in the infrared photolysis of
HOONO (open circles) and PNA (filled circles) as a function of the
pump-probe delay. The signals have not been corrected for the
difference in probe laser powers. The primary product of PNA
photolysis is HO2, which is converted into OH via reaction with NO.
Kinetic data shown here, in conjunction with photolysis spectra of
HOONO and PNA taken under well-defined conditions, are used to
estimate the product branching ratio in reaction 1.
point is quantified using NO2 titration, allowing for calculation
of the final HNO3 density. The [HNO3] and [NO2] concentra-
tions are additionally verified using FTIR spectroscopy under
similar flow conditions and found to agree with the results of
titration measurement to within 20%.
Figure 3 shows sample kinetic traces of OH concentrations
following the near-IR photolysis of PNA and HOONO. Pho-
tolysis of PNA produces HO2, which is converted into the
detected OH via reaction 4 with NO. The rise time of the
observed trace is consistent with the rate of reaction 4, and the
decay is almost entirely due to the reaction of OH with PNA.
Photolysis of HOONO generates OH on the time scale of the
pump laser pulse, consistent with OH being the primary
photoproduct. The OH decay in this case is mostly due to
reaction 1. With this information at hand, the relative initial
amounts of HO2 and OH produced in the photolysis of PNA
and HOONO is calculated in a straightforward manner. As-
suming that the integrated absorption transition strength is the
same for PNA and HOONO overtones and correcting for the
nonunity dissociation quantum yield of PNA (0.16 at 253 K),23
we can estimate the density of HOONO in the photolysis
chamber.
We estimate, using the method described above, that
[HOONO]/[HONO2] ) 0.05 ( 0.03 at 253 K in 20 Torr
helium-nitrogen buffer approximately 0.3 s after the mixing
of OH and NO2. The uncertainties do not include systematic
errors due to the assumptions described above, some of which
are not fully substantiated. For example, HOONO dissociation
quantum yield of less than 1 would tend to increase the ratio.
On the other hand, our inclusion of the HOONO combination
bands in the integrated signal decreases the ratio somewhat. The
integrated absorption cross sections for HOONO and PNA are
likely to be different, but probably not by more than 50%. But
even combining all these uncertainties together, we do not expect
the actual ratio to be off by more than a factor of 2. Thus, the
results presented here imply an approximate lower limit of 5 (
3% for the branching ratio k1b/k1a.
Acknowledgment. This work was funded in part by NASA’s
Atmospheric Effects of Aviation Program (NAG5-11157) and
the National Science Foundation’s Atmospheric Chemistry
Program (ATM-0094670). The OPO laser system was developed
with partial support from the National Science Foundation’s
Major Research Instrumentation Program (ATM-9724500;
Geoffrey A. Blake, PI). S.A.N. thanks the Camille and Henry
Dreyfus Foundation for support.
References and Notes
(1) Finlayson-Pitts, B. J.; Pitts, J. N. Chemistry of the Upper and Lower
Atmosphere: Theory, Experiments, and Applications; 1999.
(2) DeMore, W. B.; Sander, S. P.; Golden, D. M.; Hampson, R. F.;
Kurylo, M. J.; Howard, C. J.; Ravishankara, A. R.; Kolb, C. E.; Molina,
M. J. Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Stratospheric
Modeling: EValuation Number 12; JPL: Pasadena, CA, 1997.
(3) Atkinson, R.; Baulch, D. L.; Cox, R. A.; Hampson, R. F., Jr.; Kerr,
J. A.; Rossi, M. J.; Troe, J. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1997, 26, 1329.
(4) Golden, D. M.; Smith, G. P. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 3991.
(5) Donahue, N. M.; Mohrschladt, R.; Dransfield, T. J.; Anderson, J.
G.; Dubey, M. K. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 1515.
(6) Matheu, D. M.; Green, W. H., Jr. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 2000, 32,
245.
(7) Hippler, H.; Nasterlack, S.; Striebel, F.; Golden, D. M. The Reaction
of OH + NO2 + M: Rate constants and branching ratios for isomer
formation. Proceeding of the 5th International Conference on Chemical
Kinetics; NIST: Gaithersburg, MA, 2001.
(8) Dransfield, T. J.; Donahue, N. M.; Anderson, J. G. J. Phys. Chem.
A 2001, 105, 1507.
(9) Burkholder, J. B.; Hammer, P. D.; Howard, C. J. J. Phys. Chem.
1987, 91, 2136.
(10) Lo, W.-J.; Lee, Y. P. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 101, 5494.
(11) Koch, T. G.; Sodeau, J. R. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 10824.
(12) Cheng, B. M.; Lee, J. W.; Lee, Y. P. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95,
2814.
Our result is marginally consistent with the upper limit for
HOONO yield obtained by Burkholder et al. (5%)9 but overlaps
well with the upper limit from the work of Dransfield et al.
(10%).8 The isotope-specific kinetics study of reaction 1 by
Donahue et al.5 and calculations by Golden and Smith4 appear
to be on a higher side of the ratio reported here. However, one
has to be careful when comparing different experiments with
each other, as the yield of HOONO is likely to depend strongly
(13) Coddington, J. W.; Hurst, J. K.; Lymar, S. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1999, 121, 2438.
(14) Richeson, C. E.; Mulder, P.; Bowry, V. W.; Ingold, K. U. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 7211.
(15) Loegager, T.; Sehested, K. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 6664.
(16) Merenyi, G.; Lind, J. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1998, 11, 243.
(17) Kissner, R.; Nauser, T.; Bugnon, P.; Lye, P. G.; Koppenol, W. H.
Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1997, 10, 1285.
(18) Li, Y.; Francisco, J. S. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 7976.