102
P. Afanasiev, D.H. Kerridge / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 322 (2001) 97–102
NaCl melts at 7008C for the following reactions have been
published by Cherginets [27]:
anionic layers or complex chains of transition metal
polymer oxospecies, separated by K1 cations [32]. In
contrast, WO3 has a three-dimensional interconnected
structure [33] and reacts with much greater difficulty,
giving small oligomeric species. This trend can be con-
tinued since niobium oxide is not reactive at all in molten
KNO3 up to 5508C, i.e. in the range where the reaction can
still be distinguished from nitrate decomposition.
MoO3 1 O22 MoO242 pK 5 8.32
(13)
(14)
(15)
WO3 1 O22 WO242 pK 5 9.31
V O5 1 O22 2VO23 pK 5 6.95
2
The order of acidity WO3 .MoO3 .V O5 follows from
2
these data, which is the inverse of the sequence of
reactivity observed here. However, it seems evident that
the difference in the strength of various acids should in
general correspond to the difference in their reactivity
unless some kinetic hindrance is involved.
References
[1] M. Mobin, U. Malik, J. Alloys Comp. 235 (1996) 97.
[2] P. Afanasiev, C. Geantet, Coord. Chem. Rev. 178/180 (1998) 1725.
[3] G. Charlot, B. Tremillon, in: Les reactions chimiques dans les
´
solvants et les sels fondus, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1963.
[4] J. Vallet, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 4 (1972) 105.
[5] M.J. Maeso, J. Largo, Thermochim. Acta 223 (1996) 145.
[6] T. Jriri, M. Gilbert, J. Rogez, J.C. Mathieu, Ann. Chim. Fr. 19
(1994) 121.
[7] D.H. Kerridge, in: J.J. Lagovski (Ed.), Chemistry of Non-aqueous
Solvents, Vol. VB, Academic Press, New York, 1978, p. 270.
[8] H.M.A. Abood, D.H. Kerridge, Thermochim. Acta 215 (1993) 183.
[9] D.A. Habboush, D.H. Kerridge, Thermochim. Acta 101 (1974) 87.
[10] N. Coumert, M. Porthault, J.C. Merlin, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 33
(1965) 910.
[11] N. Coumert, M. Porthault, J.C. Merlin, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 35
(1967) 332.
[12] R.N. Kust, Inorg. Chem. 6 (1997) 2239.
[13] J.M. Schlegel, R. Bauer, Inorg. Chem. 11 (1972) 909.
[14] A.M. Shams El Din, A.A.E. Hosary, J. Electroanal. Chem. 7 (1964)
464.
[15] M. Hassanien, E. Kordes, Zeit. Anorg. Chem 387 (1972) 1.
[16] A.M. Shams El Din, A.A.E. Hosary, J. Electroanal. Chem. 9 (1965)
349.
[17] M. Hassanien, Zeit. Anorg. Chem 399 (1973) 125.
[18] G. Tridot, G. Nowokroki, J. Nicole, M. Wozniak, Comptes Rendus
Acad. Sci. Paris Ser. C 270 (1970) 204.
[19] M.V. Mokhasaev, S.M. Aleikina, F.I. Fedorov, Russ. J. Inorg. Chem.
11 (1966) 644.
[20] P. Afanasiev, C. Geantet, D.H. Kerridge, J. Mater. Chem. 5 (2)
(1995) 347.
[21] P. Afanasiev, C. Geantet, M. Lacroix, M. Breysse, J. Catal. 162
(1996) 143.
The electronegativity of the metals is 1.56 for Mo and V
and 1.59 for W [29]. Therefore, the electronegativity
sequence for oxides is WO3 .MoO3 .V O5. It coincides
2
with the row of oxoacidity cited above and does not
correspond to the sequence of reactivity observed here:
V O5 .MoO3 .WO3. To resolve this apparent contradic-
2
tion, the exact mechanism of the reactions must be
considered, which is seemingly not the same for the three
oxides studied. The initial step of the reactions studied is
formation of hexavanadate, trimolybdate and ditungstate,
respectively. Therefore the nuclearity of the first observed
species changes in the sequence V.Mo.W (which is the
same as the observed reactivity). Thus even if the total
reaction for vanadium has a lower equilibrium constant, its
initial step might be energetically more favorable than for
tungsten oxide. As a result we observe that V O5 reacts at
2
a lower temperature than WO3.
Note that in the sequences of transformations considered
here, every product reacted more slowly than its parent
species (that is why separate reaction maxima peaks were
observed). For example, trimolybdate is less reactive than
tetramolybdate, etc. because the oxoacidity of the sub-
sequent species progressively diminishes upon addition of
new oxygen anions.
The question then arises as to what is the reason for this
difference in reaction mechanisms. It can be supposed that
it stems from the difference in the structure of the
[22] D.R. Lide, H.P.R. Frederikse (Eds.), CRC Handbook of Chemistry
and Physics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1996, pp. 4–78.
[23] P.G. Zambonin, J. Jordan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 91 (1969) 2225.
[24] P.G. Zambonin, J. Electroanal. Chem., 24 (1970) 28, 365.
[25] L.G. Boxall, K.E. Johnson, J. Electrochem. Soc. 118 (1971) 885.
[26] G. Picard, T. Flament, B. Tremillon, J. Electrochem. Soc. 132
(1985) 863.
[27] V.L. Cherginets, Russ. Chem. Rev., 66 (1997).
[28] A.M. Shams El Din, A.A.A. Gerges, Electrochim. Acta 9 (1964)
613.
corresponding oxides. Both V O5 and MoO3 are known to
2
have a lamellar structure [30,31] and can be easily
intercalated with many guest species, e.g. organic mole-
cules or cations such as Li1 condensed Al(III) polycations.
Thus it seems possible that when reaction begins in the
solid state, the alkali metal cations penetrate first between
the layers of transition metal oxide, followed by Lux–
Flood donation of oxygen ion from nitrate to the layer of
transition metal oxide to compensate the additional charge.
Consequently the first intermediate products of reaction are
the lamellar or chain polysalts, consisting of bidimensional
`
[29] J.P. Jolivet, De la solition a l’oxyde, CNRS Editions, Paris, 1994.
[30] J.A.A. Ketelaar, Nature 137 (1936) 316.
[31] L. Kihlborg, Arkiv foer Kemi 21 (1963) 357.
[32] M. Seleborg, Acta Chim. Scand. 20 (1996) 2195.
[33] B.O. Loopstra, Acta Crystallogr. B 24 (1982) 1968.