Structure-Based Engineering of Type III Polyketide Synthase
A R T I C L E S
1
0 times less efficient than that of the pentaketide production
of the nonaketide naphthopyrone 5 is apparently different from
that of the pentaketide 5,7-dihydroxy-2-methylchromone (2),
the normal product of PCS.
by the wild-type PCS) in addition to SEK4 (3) and SEK4b (4)
(Figure 1C). The product gave a UV spectrum (λmax 240, 272,
+
and 360 nm) and a parent ion peak [M + H] at m/z 299 on
LC-ESIMS, indicating formation of a nonaketide. The nona-
ketide-forming activity was maximum at pH 6.0, but decreased
to ca. 30% under alkaline pH. In contrast, the SEK4/SEK4b-
forming activity of the PCS mutants showed a broad pH
optimum within a range of 6.0-8.0. Thus, the pH change did
not significantly affect the yield and the ratio of SEK4/SEK4b
It is remarkable that the PCS F80A/Y82A/M207G mutant
not only catalyzed condensation of nine molecules of malonyl-
CoA but also altered the mechanism of the cyclization to
produce the unnatural novel “nonaketide” naphthopyrone 5,
which is the longest polyketide generated by the structurally
simple type III PKS. Significant part of the reactions was,
however, terminated at the octaketide stage to afford SEK4/
SEK4b as shunt products. The low yield of the enzyme reaction
products could be attributed to the possible conformational
changes caused by the triple mutation. In addition, it should be
noted that the entrance to the newly formed polyketide tunnel
is still narrow in the triple mutant (Figure 3). Further optimiza-
tion of the active-site structure would lead to improvement of
the yield of the nonaketide product. On the other hand, despite
the structural similarity with eleutherinol (8), formation of the
“octaketide” naphthopyrone was not detected either with the
M207G point mutant or with the triple mutant, which was
confirmed by the LC-ESIMS analysis. The naphthalene ring-
forming activity was thus only attained by the F80A/Y82A/
M207G triple mutation.
(1:4). Only the nonaketide-forming activity suffered sharp
decline under the alkaline pH.
1
The H NMR spectrum of the nonaketide product obtained
from a large-scale incubation revealed the presence of three
aromatic protons (δ 7.20, 6.60, and 6.52, each 1H, s), one R,â-
unsaturated olefinic proton (δ 6.31, 1H, s), one methylene (δ
3
.94, 2H, s), and two methyl protons (δ 2.77 and 2.34, each
3H, s). A structure with a naphthopyrone skeleton was uniquely
consistent with both biogenetic reasoning and NMR spectro-
scopic data, including heteronuclear correlation spectroscopy
(
HMQC and HMBC). The structure of the novel nonaketide
was thus determined to be 2-acetonyl-8,10-dihydroxy-5-methyl-
H-naphtho[1,2-b]pyran-4-one (5) (Figure 1C), which has been
4
isolated until now neither from the aloe plant, a rich source of
As mentioned above, our homology model predicted that the
replacement of the three residues (Phe80, Tyr82, and Met197)
resulted in dramatic increase in the active-site cavity volume.
The functional conversion appeared to be caused by the simple
steric modulation of the active site accompanied by conservation
of the Cys-His-Asn catalytic triad. Interestingly, a similar active-
site architecture with the downward expanding polyketide tunnel
has been reported for a bacterial “pentaketide” naphthalene-
producing type III PKS, 1,3,6,8-tetrahydroxynaphthalene syn-
aromatic polyketides such as pharmaceutically important aloenin
2
(hexaketide), aloesin (heptaketide), and barbaloin (octaketide),
nor from other natural sources.
1
0
thase (THNS) from S. coelicolor that shares only ca. 20%
amino acid sequence identity with the plant enzyme. On the
basis of the crystal structure of S. coelicolor THNS, the possible
involvement of an additional catalytic Cys residue has been
proposed for the unusual naphthalene ring formation reaction.10
However, such an additional Cys residue is not present at the
catalytic center of A. arborescens PCS; only the conventional
Cys174 (corresponding to CHS’s Cys164) serves as the covalent
attachment site for the growing polyketide intermediates,
suggesting a different mechanism of the enzyme reaction in the
PCS F80A/Y82A/M207G mutant.
Interestingly, the structure of the novel nonaketide 5 showed
The proposed mechanism of the formation of the nonaketide
naphthopyrone 5 with a fused tricyclic ring system involves a
consecutive intramolecular aldol condensation (Figure 4A).
Presumably, the enzyme catalyzes the first aromatic ring
formation reaction after the sequential decarboxylative conden-
sations of nine molecules of malonyl-CoA. One of the most
important points here is the timing of the cyclization reaction
and the thioester bond cleavage of the nonaketide intermediate
bound to the active-site Cys. Further, it is not certain whether
all three ring formations are enzymatic or not. At least, the final
pyranone ring formation, as in the case of that of SEK4/SEK4b
(Figure 1B), is likely to be a nonenzymatic process. The partially
cyclized aromatic intermediates would be released from the
active site and undergo subsequent spontaneous cyclizations,
thereby completing the formation of the fused ring system.
close similarity with heptaketides aloesone (2-acetonyl-7-
7
hydroxy-5-methylchromone) (6) produced by the aloe plant and
6
-hydroxymusizin (2-acetyl-1,6,8-trihydroxy-3-methylnaphtha-
8
lene) (7) from rhubarb (Polygonaceae), and an octaketide
eleutherinol (8,10-dihydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-4H-naphtho[1,2-b]-
pyran-4-one) (8), a constituent of another medicinal plant
9
Eleutherine bulbosa (Iridaceae), suggesting that these aromatic
polyketides are produced by closely related type III PKSs.
Indeed, we have previously reported that the G207A mutant of
A. arborescens octaketide synthase produced aloesone from
seven molecules of malonyl-CoA.3a In contrast, the structure
(
(
(
7) Abe, I.; Utsumi, Y.; Oguro, S.; Noguchi, H. FEBS Lett. 2004, 562, 171-
76.
8) Tsuboi, M.; Minami, M.; Nonaka, G.; Nishioka, I. Chem. Pharm. Bull.
1
1
977, 25, 2708-2712.
9) (a) Birch, A. J.; Donovan, F. W. Aust. J. Chem. 1953, 6, 373-378. (b)
Ebnother, A.; Meijer, Th. M.; Schmid, H. HelV. Chim. Acta 1952, 35, 910-
9
(10) Austin, M. B.; Izumikawa, M.; Bowman, M. E.; Udwary, D. W.; Ferrer,
28.
J.-L.; Moore, B. S.; Noel, J. P. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 45162-45174.
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 129, NO. 18, 2007 5979