C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
lecular general acid catalysis by the dimethylammonium center in
8-dimethylamino-1-naphthyl phosphates 2a and 2b, the hydrolysis
of the monoester 2a is 18 times faster than that of the diester 2b.10
Figure 2. ESI-MS/MS of the Me-IMPP anion of m/z 253.
Conversely, hydrolysis of the BMIPP diester is ∼540 times more
reactive than the zwitterionic Me-IMPP monoester. The result
indicates important intramolecular general base catalysis as shown
in Scheme 2. Similarly to the reaction of 2a, we have no evidence
to implicate a pentacovalent intermediate, and any such species
would be very short-lived.10
The intramolecular catalytic efficiency of BMIPP is even more
significant in comparisons with reactions involving cleavage of
RNA and various derivatives by imidazole buffers that show
enhancements of up to 3-fold,11b or the intramolecular hydrolysis
of bis-(2-carboxyphenyl) phosphate, where was observed an
unexpectedly low general acid catalysis, of only 4-fold.11c
In BMIPP, the distance between proton-accepting and -donating
nitrogen atoms is ca. 7 Å (corresponding distances in RNase are
∼6.5 Å). Molecular models of the ground state of BMIPP show
that the general acid is hydrogen bonded to both, the aryl oxygen
and to one of the negatively charged nonbridging phosphoester
oxygens. This initial state is consistent with reports of Anslyn et
al.12 for the guanidinium substituent as intramolecular general-acid
catalyst in phosphoryl transfer reactions and observed a 40-fold
rate enhancement relative to a reaction with proton transfer to the
nonbridging phosphoester oxygen. The catalytic effect in BMIPP
results from the combination of (i) favorable activation of a water
molecule by general base catalysis and (ii) the concerted proton
transfer from the general acid catalyst to the bridge oxygen atom,
which requires simultaneous rotation of the imidazolium to approach
planarity with the phenyl ring in the transition state. The detailed
mechanism of the observed effect will be discussed in our full paper
including density functional theory calculations.
Figure 3. ESI-MS/MS of deprotonated IMP of m/z 173.
Figure 4. pH-rate profiles for the hydrolysis of BMIPP (2) and Me-
IMPP (9), at 60 °C, µ ) 1.0 (KCl). The solid lines for BMIPP and Me-
IMPP represent fits with eqs 1 and 2, respectively. The black solid line is
the fit for hydrolysis of 2-(2′-imidazolium)phenyl phosphate (IMPP).9
Scheme 2. Mechanism Proposed for the Hydrolysis of BMIPP
Acknowledgment. We thank the Brazilian foundations CNPq,
FAPESC, and FAPESP for financial assistance.
Supporting Information Available: Synthesis and characterization
of bis(2-(1-methyl-1H-imidazolyl)phenyl)phosphate, BMIPP; tables of
kinetic data. This material is available free of charge via the Internet
and BMIPP, respectively. The hydrolysis of BMIPPH+ is slower
than the hydrolysis of the zwitterionic form of Me-IMPP, and the
data for hydrolysis of the monoester in Figure 4 were fitted with
eq 2, giving kzm ) 3.65 × 10-6 s-1 and pKa ) 4.52. The calculated
rate and acid dissociation constant are similar to those reported for
the hydrolysis of 2-(2′imidazolium)phenyl phosphate (IMPP, solid
line in Figure 4), indicating that the methyl group decreases slightly
the catalytic efficiency of the imidazolium group.9
References
(1) Raines, R. T. Chem. ReV. 1998, 98, 1045-1065.
(2) Herschlag, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 11631-11635.
(3) Niittymaki, T.; Lonnerberg, H. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4, 15-25.
(4) Breslow, R.; Doherty, J. B.; Guillot, G.; Lipsey, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1978, 100, 3227-3229.
(5) Breslow, R.; Anslyn, E.V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 5972-5973.
(6) Liu, L.; Rozenman, M.; Breslow, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12660-
12661.
(7) (a) Domingos, J. B.; Longhinotti, E.; Branda˜o, T. A. S.; Santos, L. S.;
Eberlin, M. N.; Bunton, C. A.; Nome, F. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 7898-
7905. (b) Domingos, J. B.; Longhinotti, E.; Branda˜o, T. A. S.; Santos, L.
S.; Eberlin, M. N.; Bunton, C. A.; Nome, F. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69,
6024-6033.
(8) (a) Santos, L. S.; Pavam, C. H.; Almeida, W. P.; Coelho, F.; Eberlin, M.
N. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 4330-4333. (b) Santos, L. S.; Rosso,
G. B.; Pilli, R. A.; Eberlin, M. N. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 5809-5812.
(9) Branda˜o, T. A. S.; Orth, E. S.; Rocha, W. R.; Bortoluzzi, A. J.; Bunton,
C. A.; Nome, F. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 3800-3807.
(10) Kirby, A. J.; Lima, M. F.; Silva, D.; Roussex, C. D.; Nome, F. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 16944-16952.
(11) (a) Kirby, A. J.; Younas, M. J. Chem. Soc. B 1970, 510-513. (b) Kirby,
A. J.; Marriott, R. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 833-834. (c) Kirby,
A. J.; Abell, K. W. Y. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1983, 8, 1171-
1174.
kobs ) kzmøMe-IMPP
(2)
The observed isotope kinetic effect, kH2O/kD2O, was 1.42, consistent
with proton transfer in transition state formation and similar with
values reported for other intramolecularly catalyzed phosphodiester
hydrolysis reactions.9,10 The activation parameters ∆Hq )19.0 (
1.2 kcal/mol and ∆Sq ) -9.05 ( 0.5 eu calculated for the
zwitterionic species of BMIPP, at pH 5.5-7.0 at each temperature,
indicate a bimolecular hydrolysis mechanism, involving a water
molecule in the transition state.9
The hydrolysis of BMIPP is considerably faster by a factor of
106, than those of diphenyl phosphates with leaving groups of
similar pKa (∼7.85),11a which is attributed to intramolecular general
acid-base catalysis. It is important to notice that in the intramo-
(12) Anslyn, E. V.; Piatek, A. M.; Gray, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
9878-9879.
JA710693X
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 8, 2008 2437