In recent years diaryliodonium salts have attracted
considerable attention as powerful electrophilic arylation
a
7
reagents. They have been employed in metal-catalyzed
,8
9
Table 1. Survey of Solvents and Influence of the Counterion
1
0
and, more importantly, in metal-free arylation reactions,
such as the metal-free arylation of oxygen nucleophiles
1
1
recently reported by the group of Olofsson.
In the course of our investigations toward new synthetic
methods for the synthesis of sulfonyl-group containing
molecules, we became interested in the use of diaryliodonium
salts as possible arylating agents for sulfur nucleophiles.
Herein, we present our results on the metal-free arylation
of sulfinic acid sodium salts 1 with diaryliodonium salts 2.
In preliminary studies, we investigated the reaction of
benzenesulfinic acid sodium salt (1a) with diphenyliodo-
nium triflate (2a). To our delight this reaction takes place
in the absence of any metal catalyst or additional base.
While a variety of solvents can be used for this reaction
À
b
entry
solvent
THF
salt
X
yield (%)
c
1
2a
2a
2a
2a
2a
2a
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
OTf
OTf
OTf
OTf
OTf
OTf
OTf
Cl
77
2
1,4-dioxane
toluene
DMSO
NMP
65
59
94
96
94
3
4
5
6
DMF
d
7
DMF
90
8
DMF
95
96
96
96
9
DMF
PF
BF
OTs
6
10
11
DMF
4
(
Table 1, entries 1À7), the best results were obtained with
polar aprotic solvents such as N,N-dimethylformamide
DMF), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), or N-methyl-2-pyr-
DMF
a
Reaction conditions: 1.0 equiv of 1a and 1.1 equiv of 2 in 1.0 mL of
solvent at 90 °C for 24 h. Isolated yield. Reaction performed at 80 °C.
Reaction run without exclusion of air or moisture.
b
c
(
1
2,13
d
rolidone (NMP).
Interestingly, this reaction is quite insensitive to air and
moisture. When the reaction was set up and run without an
inert atmosphere using commercial grade DMF (entry 7),
3a was isolated in almost equally good yield. The nature of
the counterion had no influence on the yield, and different
diphenyliodonium salts worked as efficiently (entries 8À11).
With the optimized conditions in hand, we next explored
the scope of this reaction. As shown in Table 2, various
arylsulfinic acid sodium salts are suitable substrates re-
gardless of their electronic or steric properties. Both electron-
rich and -poor sulfinic acid sodium salts 1c and 1g lead
to the desired diarylsulfones 3c and 3g in excellent
yields (entries 3 and 7). Reaction of the bromo-substituted
substrate 1d delivered diarylsulfone 3d (entry 4) that could
be easily further modified using cross-coupling chemistry.
Steric hindrance, often problematic in metal-catalyzed
(
7) For reviews on diaryliodonium salts, see: (a) Merritt, E. A.;
Olofsson, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9052–9070. (b) Zhdankin,
V. V.; Stang, P. J. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 5299–5358. (c) Zhdankin, V. V.;
Stang, P. J. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 2523–2584. (d) Stang, P. J.; Zhdankin,
V. V. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 1123–1178.
(
8) For efficient routes to diaryl iodonium salts, see: (a) Bielawski,
M.; Olofsson, B. Org. Synth. 2009, 86, 308–314. (b) Bielawski, M.; Aili,
D.; Olofsson, B. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 4602–4607. (c) Zhu, M.;
Jalalian, N.; Olofsson, B. Synlett 2008, 4, 592–596. (d) Bielawski, M.;
Zhu, M.; Olofsson, B. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 2610–2618. (e)
Hossain, M. D.; Kitamura, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2007, 80, 2213. (f)
Hossain, M. D.; Ikegami, Y.; Kitamura, T. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71,
9
903–9905. (g) Carroll, M. A.; Pike, V. W.; Widdowson, D. A. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 2000, 41, 5393. (h) Kitamura, T.; Matsuyuki, J.; Taniguchi,
H. Synthesis 1994, 147–148. (i) Stang, P. J.; Zhdankin, V. V.; Tykwinski,
R.; Zefirov, N. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 7497–7498.
(9) (a) Allen, A. E.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011,
14
coupling reactions, does not pose a problem. The steri-
1
33, 4260–4263. (b) Bigot, A.; Williamson, A. E.; Gaunt, M. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 13778–13781. (c) Ciana, C.-L.; Phipps, R. J.;
Brandt, J. R.; Meyer, F.-M.; Gaunt, M. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011,
cally veryhindered (1,3,5-triisopropyl)benzenesulfinic acid
sodium salt (1j) was phenylated in 61% yield (entry 10).
This method can be extended to heteroarylsulfinic acid
sodium salts 1kÀm to synthesize arylheteroaryl sulfones
50, 458–462. (d) Duong, H. A.; Gilligan, R. E.; Cooke, M. L.; Phipps,
R. J.; Gaunt, M. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 463–466. (e)
Wagner, A. M.; Sanford, M. S. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 288–291. (f) Xiao,
B.; Fu, Y.; Xu, J.; Gong, T.-J.; Dai, J.-J.; Yi, J.; Liu, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
3
kÀm, which are of particular interest for the development
2010, 132, 468–469. (g) Bedford, R. B.; Webster, R. L.; Mitchell, C.
3
a,c,d
J. Org. Biomol. Chem 2009, 7, 4853–4857. (h) Deprez, N. R.; Sanford,
M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 11234–11241. (i) Phipps, R. J.;
Gaunt, M. J. Science 2009, 323, 1593–1597. (j) Phipps, R. J.; Grimster,
N. P.; Gaunt, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 8172–8174. (k) Kalyani,
D.; Deprez, N. R.; Desai, L. V.; Sanford, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
of new drugs
salts, such as methanesulfinic acid sodium salt (1n), did not
react under these conditions.
(entries 12À14). Only alkylsulfinic acid
We next examined the reactivity of other symmetrical
and unsymmetrical diaryliodonium salts. The reaction of
benzenesulfinic acid sodium salt (1a) with various symme-
trical diaryliodonium salts 2 furnished the phenylarylsul-
fones of type 3 in moderate to excellent yields (Table 3,
entries 1À7). Halogen-substituted substrates 2jÀl effi-
ciently arylated 1a (entries 5À7). Steric hindrance in the
diaryliodonium salt was not a problem. Reaction of ortho-
or bis(ortho)-substituted salts 2g and 2h delivered the
diarylsulfones 3n and 3o in very high yields (entries 2 and 3).
Unsymmetrical salts 2m and 2n selectively transferred
1
27, 7330–7331.
(10) (a) Ackermann, L.; Dell’Acqua, M.; Fenner, S.; Vicente, R.;
Sandmann, R. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 2358–2360. (b) Dohi, T.; Ito, M.;
Yamaoka, N.; Morimoto, K.; Fujioka, H.; Kita, Y. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2010, 49, 3334–3337. (c) Morimoto, K.; Yamaoka, N.; Ogawa, C.;
Nakae, T.; Fujioka, H.; Dohi, T.; Kita, Y. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 3804–
3807. (d) Eastman, K.; Baran, P. S. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 3149–1354. (e)
Kita, Y.; Morimoto, K.; Ito, M.; Ogawa, C.; Goto, A.; Dohi, T. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 1668–1669. (f) Caroll, M. A.; Wood, R. A.
Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 11349–11354.
(11) (a) Jalalian, N.; Petersen, T. B.; Olofsson, B. Chem.;Eur. J.
2012, 18, 14140–14149. (b) Petersen, T. B.; Khan, R.; Olofsson, B. Org.
Lett. 2011, 13, 3462–3465. (c) Jalalian, N.; Ishikawa, E. E.; Silva, L. F.,
Jr.; Olofsson, B. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 1552–1555.
12) This might be due to the improved solubility of the sulfinic acid
sodium salts in polar solvents.
13) While slightly higher yields were obtained in NMP and DMSO,
(
(
(14) Transition Metals for Organic Synthesis, 2nd ed.; Beller, M.,
the removal of DMF from the reaction is considerably easier.
Bolm, C.; Wiley VCH: Weinheim, 2004.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX