C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
the results described here appear to be the first demonstration of
an inverted electronic dependence in ligand substitution.10,11
Mechanistically, this reactivity is closely related to oxidative
addition reactions that proceed by nucleophilic attack of the metal
on the substrate, as in the addition of methyl iodide to iridium(I)
in Vaska’s complex.12 We have initiated computational studies to
probe details of the orbital interactions in these reactions, in
particular to compare the reactivity between olefins and dioxygen
with palladium(0). The data described herein, in addition to their
fundamental value, have implications for the design and develop-
ment of electron-rich transition-metal catalysts, which find wide-
spread application in catalytic transformations.
Figure 3. Approach-to-equilibrium absorbance data for the intermolecular
H
exchange between (bc)Pd(nsCH ) and ns . Reaction conditions: [(bc)Pd-
3
H
(nsCH )] ) 100 µmol, [ns ] ) 140 µmol, 2.5 mL CH2Cl2, 300 K.
3
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the Camille
and Henry Dreyfus Foundation (New Faculty Award), Merck
Research Laboratories, Research Corporation (Innovation Award),
and the NSF (CAREER Award, CHE-0094344). We thank Profes-
sor Clark Landis for training in numerical data fitting methods.
Supporting Information Available: Synthesis and characterization
details (including crystallographic data) for (bc)Pd(nsX) derivatives and
description of kinetics experiments (PDF). This material is available
Figure 4. Hammett plot reflecting electronic effects on ligand substitution
of nsCH from (bc)Pd(nsCH ) by p-substituted nitrostyrene derivatives.
3
3
References
(1) (a) Heck, R. F. Palladium Reagents in Organic Syntheses; Academic
Press: Orlando, 1985. (b) Tsuji, J. Palladium Reagents and Catalysts;
Wiley: New York, 1995.
(2) (a) Henry, P. M. Palladium Catalyzed Oxidation of Hydrocarbons;
Kluwer: Boston, 1980. (b) For a specific recent example, see: ten Brink,
G.-J.; Arends, I. W. C. E.; Sheldon, R. A. Science 2000, 287, 1636-
1639.
(3) (a) Stahl, S. S.; Thorman, J. L.; Nelson, R. C.; Kozee, M. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 7188-7189. (b) Steinhoff, B. A.; Fix, S. R.; Stahl, S. S.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 766-767.
(4) (a) Ozawa, F.; Ito, T.; Nakamura, Y.; Yamamoto, A. J. Organomet. Chem.
1979, 168, 375-391. (b) van Asselt, R.; Elsevier, C. J.; Smeets, W. J. J.;
Spek, A. L. Inorg. Chem. 1994, 33, 1521-1531. (c) Canovese, L.;
Visentin, F.; Uguagliati, P.; Crociani, B. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.
1996, 1921-1926. (d) Canovese, L.; Visentin, F.; Chessa, G.; Uguagliati,
P.; Dolmella, A. J. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 601, 1-15.
Figure 5. Qualitative molecular orbital representations of normal- and
inverse electron demand “associative” ligand substitution reactions.
(5) See ref 4 and Halpern, J.; Weil, T. A. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1973, 631-632.
The nondegenerate exchange between (bc)Pd(nsX) and different
(6) For leading references describing similar equilibrium electronic effects
for other zerovalent, group 10 olefin complexes, see: (a) Otsuka, S.;
Yoshida, T.; Tatsuno, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 6462-6469. (b)
Tolman, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 2780-2789. (c) Ittel, S. D.;
Ibers, J. A. AdV. Organomet. Chem. 1976, 14, 33. (d) Ittel, S. D. Inorg.
Chem. 1977, 16, 2589-2597.
(7) This nomenclature is borrowed from the frontier-orbital description of
Diels-Alder and related cycloaddition reactions: Fleming, I. Frontier
Orbitals and Organic Chemical Reactions; Wiley: New York, 1976.
(8) (a) Langford, C. H.; Gray, H. B. Ligand Substitution Processes; W. A.
Benjamin: New York, 1965. (b) Basolo, F.; Pearson, R. G. Mechanisms
of Inorganic Reactions; 2nd ed.; Wiley: New York, 1967.
olefins, nsX′, for which X * X′, is too rapid to monitor by NMR
methods. Instead, the reaction between (bc)Pd(nsCH ) and four
3
different para-substituted nitrostyrene derivatives was studied by
UV-visible spectroscopy. Kinetics data for these bimolecular
exchange reactions (e.g., Figure 3) were analyzed by numerical
integration to obtain forward and backward rate constants. The
Hammett analysis (Figure 4) of the forward rate constants reveals
that exchange rates are faster with more electron-withdrawing
substituents on the incoming olefin, namely less nucleophilic
substrates react more readily in the associatiVe ligand substitution
reaction. This observation implicates an “inverse-electron-demand”
ligand substitution pathway in which the primary electronic
interaction in the transition state occurs between a filled palladium
orbital donating into the empty olefin π* orbital (Figure 5).7 Such
orbital energetics are favored by the use of palladium(0), which
has fully occupied 4d orbitals, together with an electron-deficient
olefin bearing a low-lying LUMO. This transition-state argument
is linked to thermodynamic considerations via the Hammond
postulate, namely ligands with enhanced π-acidity might be
expected to stabilize a high-energy tetrahedral intermediate and
thereby promote the substitution reaction.
(9) The biphilic, i.e., both nucleophilic and electrophilic, character of certain
ligands (NO2-, SeCN-, and thiourea) has been identified in ligand
substitution reactions based on (1) their relative reactivity toward platinum-
(II) complexes bearing different charges and (2) deviations from predicted
rates based on their nucleophilicity parameter, nPt. See, for example: (a)
Pearson, R. G.; Gray, H. B.; Basolo, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960, 82, 787-
792. (b) Gray, H. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962, 84, 1548-1552. (c) Belluco,
U.; Cattalini, L.; Turco, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 226-229.
(10) The following reference states explicitly that such “electrophilic” ligand
substitution pathways are unknown, and we are unaware of any subsequent
precedent. Collman, J. P.; Hegedus, L. S.; Norton, J. R.; Finke, R. G.
Principles and Applications of Organotransition Metal Chemistry; 2nd
ed.; University Science Books: Mill Valley, CA, 1987; p 238.
(11) Anomalous electronic effects observed recently in ligand substitution
reactions of electrophilic platinum(II) and iridium(III) complexes have
been attributed to ground-state stabilization effects. The mechanism in
these cases remains consistent with attack of a nucleophilic ligand on an
electrophilic metal center. (a) Zhong, H. A.; Labinger, J. A.; Bercaw, J.
E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1378-1399. (2) Tellers, D. M.; Yung,
C. M.; Arndtsen, B. A.; Adamson, D. R.; Bergman, R. G. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 1400-1410.
π-Acceptor contributions to ligand substitution reactions, for
example, in the trans-effect, have been recognized since the early
seminal studies of ligand substitution at platinum(II).8,9 However,
(12) Reference 10, Chapter 5.
JA028738Z
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 1, 2003 13