5
32
KIM ET AL.
TABLE 4
the oxidation of CO to CO . The oxidative carbonylation
2
0
a
of aniline (40 mmol) was performed in methanol (25 ml) at
Alcoholysis of N,N -Diphenyl Urea
�
1
30 C and 6.80 MPa (O2/CO = 20/80) for 2 h. GC analysis of
Selectivity (% )
Pressure (MPa) Temp. ( C) Conversion (% ) Carbamateb Aniline
gas sample showed that 7.7% of CO consumed was oxidized
to CO2. Conversion of aniline and selectivity to methyl-N-
phenyl carbamate were 97.5% and 49.2% , respectively. In
�
0
.1 (N2)
130
170
130
170
60.5
96.2
25.5
67.5
49.2
49.2
82.8
75.9
50.4
50.5
16.7
23.7
order to find out the effect of CO formation on the car-
bonylation of aniline, the carbonylation reaction was con-
ducted in the presence of added CO2 using 6.80 MPa of
2
0
6
6
.1 (N2)
.80 (O2/CO)
.80 (O2/CO)
CO2/O2/CO mixture gas (CO2/O2/CO = 12/18/70) instead
a
0
Conditions: N,N -diphenyl urea 20 mmol, SeO2 0.2 mmol, K2CO3 of O /CO (O /CO = 20/80). Gas chromatographic analy-
2
2
1
mmol, methanol 25 ml, toluene 1 g (internal standard), O2/CO = 20/80,
sis of liquid sample gave 98.1% of conversion and 48.3%
of selectivity, which were similar to those obtained from
the above experiment performed without the presence of
added CO2.
reaction time 2 h.
b
Carbamate: methyl-N-phenyl carbamate.
of formation of aniline from diphenyl urea is higher than
From these results, it is concluded that the oxidation of
that of aniline disappearance by carbonylation at higher CO to CO2 occurs in significant yield, but the effect of CO2
temperature (see Eqs. [1–3]). The results on the alcoholysis formation on the carbonylation of aniline can be negle-
�
�
of diphenyl urea at 130 C and 170 C are listed in Table 4. cted.
Table 4 shows that under atmospheric pressure of N2 at
�
1
30 C, the 60.5% of diphenyl urea was converted into ani- 3.8. Proposed Mechanism
line and phenyl carbamate. When the reaction was con-
ducted at 6.80 MPa of O2/CO, however, the conversion
dropped significantly from 60.5% to 25.5% . Such a pressure
effect was also observed by Macho et al. (4). The selectivity
of phenyl carbamate increased with the increase of tem-
perature while the selectivity of diphenyl urea decreased,
strongly indicating that diphenyl urea is an intermediate to
the formation of phenyl carbamate. The effect of pressure
on the conversion of aniline as shown in Fig. 4 seems to be
less pronounced than that of temperature because the con-
version reached over 85% as long as the pressure was main-
tained above 2.04 MPa of O2/CO (O2/CO = 20/80). How-
ever, the selectivity of phenyl carbamate was found to be
more strongly dependent on the pressure as going from 8%
at 2.04 MPa to 49% at 6.80 MPa even though the depen-
dence was much less pronounced compared with that of
temperature. In order to test the catalyst reusuability, the
carbonylation reaction was performed for 2 h in the pres-
Based on the experimental results, the mechanism of the
oxidative carbonylation of aniline catalyzed by K2SeO3 is
proposed in Scheme 1. As described in the experimental
section, the active species, K2SeO3 is formed by the reac-
tion of SeO2 with K2CO3. In a second step, aniline reacts
with K2SeO3 to give amido complex II. Amido species II
could take up one molecule of CO to form selenium car-
bonyl species, Se(OK)2(CO)(OH)(NHPh), and the subse-
quent insertion of CO into Se–N bond would produce car-
bamoyl complex III. The formation of carbamoyl species
III seems to be a key step in the proposed mechanism. Ad-
dition of one molecule of another aniline to species III and
the subsequent elimination of diphenyl urea and H2O give
rise to selenium species IV (path A). IV can also be pro-
duced by interaction of species III with one molecule of
methanol and subsequent elimination of phenyl carbamate
and H2O (path B). Liberated diphenyl urea can be added
to I, forming Se(OK)2(OH)(NPhCONHPh), which, in turn,
reacts with methanol to give phenyl carbamate, simultane-
ously regenerating species II (path C). The final step is the
regeneration of K2SeO3 (I) by the interaction of species IV
with molecular O2. Even though diphenyl urea was found to
be easily converted into phenyl carbamate by reacting with
methanol in the presence of SeO2/K2CO3 catalyst, it cannot
be concluded that diphenyl urea is the sole intermediate to
the formation of phenyl carbamate. Phenyl carbamate also
�
ence of a catalyst, SeO2/K2CO3 at 130 C and 6.80 MPa of
O2/CO in methanol. After the reaction, the reaction solu-
tion was filtered to remove insoluble diphenyl urea. The
resulting solution containing the catalyst was reused with
a fresh charge of aniline. It was found that the catalyst re-
tained its original activity even after four reuses.
3
.7. Effect of CO2
The catalytic activity of SeO2/K2CO3 was tested for the can be produced directly via a separate route such as path
oxidation of CO to CO2, and the effect of CO2 on the ox- B other than the diphenyl urea route.
idative carbonylation of aniline was investigated.
It isreported that oxidation ofCO to CO2 takesplace dur-
ing the oxidative carbonylation of amines (24). As most of
the catalysts proposed in the literature, our catalyst system,
4
. CONCLUSIONS
Various factors affecting the oxidative carbonylation of
SeO2/K2CO3, also showed some catalytic activity toward aromatic amines were investigated in the presence of a new