Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
ARTICLE
Determination of Total Flavonoid Content. The AlCl
3
meth-
dd, J = 9.6, 2.4 Hz, H-4), 6.35 and 7.62 (1H each, d, J = 16.0 Hz, H-R,
18
00 00
H-β), 6.78 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz, H-5 ), 6.94 (1H, dd, J = 7.8, 2.0 Hz, H-6 ),
od was used to determine the total flavonoid content. Briefly, 0.5 mL of
each sample (2000 μg/mL) was separately mixed with 0.1 mL of 10%
aluminum chloride, 0.1 mL of 1 M potassium acetate, and 2.8 mL of
distilled water. After incubation at room temperature for 30 min, the
absorbance was measured at 415 nm with a microplate reader
Molecular Devices). The amount of 10% aluminum chloride was
substituted by the same amount of distilled water in the blank. Catechin
0, 100, 200, 400, 600, and 800 μg/mL) was used to make a calibration
0
0
13
3
7.06 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-2 ); C NMR (125 MHz, CD OD), δ 14.0
0
0
0
(q, C-4 ), 20.0 (t, C-3 ), 31.6 (t, C-2 ), 38.3 (t, C-6), 42.3 (t, C-2), 65.6
(d, C-3), 66.4 (t, C-1 ), 69.2 (d, C-5), 76.5 (s, C-1), 78.8 (d, C-4), 115.2
(d, C-R), 115.2 (d, C-2 ), 116.5 (d, C-5 ), 123.0 (d, C-6 ), 127.8 (s,
C-1 ), 146.7 (s, C-3 ), 147.1 (d, C-β), 149.4 (d, C-4 ), 169.0 (s, C-9 ),
0
0
0
00
00
0
0
00
00
00
(
0
175.3 (s, C-7) Key HMBC correlations: H-1 , H-2, and H-6/C-7; H-4,
0
0
ꢀ
(
H-R, and H-β/C-9 . ESIMS, m/z 409 [M ꢀ H] . HRESIMS, 409.1536
+
curve. The total flavonoid content was expressed as milligram catechin
equivalents (CE) per gram of extract.
25 9
[M + Na] (calcd 409.1499 for C20H O ).
Kaempferol 3-O-{R-L-rhamnopyranosyl(1f6)-[R-L-rhamnopyranosyl-
(1f2)]}-β-D-galactopyranoside (2): yellow amorphous; IR (KBr) νmax
Evaluation of Reactive Oxygen Species in HepG2 Cells.
ROS in HepG2 cells were measured by the conversion of nonfluorescent
ꢀ
1
(cm ), 3410, 1667, 1608, 1505, 1069; UV (MeOH) λmax nm (log ε),
1
0
0
0 0
2
(
,7 -dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCF-DA) into 2 ,7 dichlorofluorescein
265 (3.96), 348 (3.89); H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d
6
), δ 0.79 and
0
000
000
DCF). PBS-rinsed cells were treated with TNF-R (200 ng/mL) with or
without extract or isolated compound for 2 h and then incubated with 8
0.94 (3H each, d, J = 6.0 Hz, rhamnosyl H-6 and 6 ), 4.30 and 5.04
0000 000
(1H each, br s, anomeric H-1 and -1 ), 5.47 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz,
00
anomeric H-1 ), 6.18 and 6.38 (1H each, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-6 and -8), 6.86
μM CM-H DCFDA for 30 min at 37 °C. After PBS washing, fluoro-
2
0 0 0 0
and 7.93 (2H each, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-(3 (5 )) and -2 (6 )), 10.10, 10.80,
metric analysis was performed at the indicated time points with the
excitation and emission wavelengths at 485 and 530 nm, respectively, in
0
13
and 12.63 (1H each, br s, OH-4 , OH-7, OH-5); C NMR (125 MHz,
19
0000 000
a FLEX Station (Molecular Devices Corp.).
DMSO-d ), δ 17.3 (q, C-6 ), 17.7 (q, C-6 ), 66.9 (t, galactopyranosyl
6
00 000
C-6 ), 68.2 (d, rhamnopyranosyl, C-5 ), 68.3 (d, rhamnopyranosyl,
Cell Viability Assay. HepG2 cells were cultured in DMEM
medium (containing 10% FBS, pH 7.2ꢀ7.4). During 24 h of incubation,
cells in serum-free medium were exposed to TNF-R in the absence or
presence of extract or isolated pure compounds at the indicated
concentrations for 6 h by MTT assay. The cell viability of various test
groups was determined by the following equation: (absorbance of the
test group/absorbance of the control) ꢁ 100%. All test samples
mentioned above were dissolved in DMSO. The final concentration
of DMSO was <0.1% and the group of 0.1% DMSO was used as the
0
000
000 0000
C-5 ), 70.3 (d, rhamnopyranosyl C-2 (2 )), 70.5 (d, rhamnopyr-
anosyl C-3 ), 70.6 (d, rhamnopyranosyl, C-3 ), 70.6 (d, galactopyr-
anosyl C-4 ), 71.8 (d, rhamnopyranosy C-4 (4 )), 75.7 (d,
galactopyranosyl C-3 ), 77.1 (d, galactopyranosyl C-2 ), 77.2 (d,
galactopyranosyl C-5 ), 93.5 (d, C-8), 98.6 (d, C-6), 98.7 (d, galacto-
pyranosyl C-1 ), 100.6 (d, rhamnosyl, C-1 ), 100.8 (d, rhamnosyl,
C-1 ), 104 (s, C-10), 115.0 (d, C-3 (5 )), 120.9 (s, C-1 ), 130.7 (d,
C-2 (6 )), 132.6 (s, C-3), 156.4 (s, C-9), 156.9 (s, C-2), 159.8 (C-4 ),
161.2 (s, C-5), 164.0 (s, C-7), 177.2 (s, C-4). Key HMBC correlations:
0
000
000
0
0
000
0000
0
0
00
0
0
0
0
000
0
0
000
0
0
0
0
0
20
control group.
0
Isolation and Purification Process. The air-dried flowers of H.
fulva (10 kg) were purchased from Taitung, Taiwan, in 2009. The dried
flowers (10 kg) were soaked with aqueous ethanol (80% EtOH) at 60 °C
overnight (3 ꢁ 80 L). The combined extracts were evaporated under
reduced pressure in a rotary vacuum evaporator. The dry extract (HF,
H-6, H-8, 7-OH (δ 10.80)/C-7; 5-OH (δ 12.63)/C-5, C-6, C-10; 4 -OH
0
0
000
0
0
0
00
0000
00
00
000
00
(δ 10.10), H-2 (6 ), H-3 (5 )/C-4 ; H-1 /C-3, C-2 , C-3 ; H-1 /C-2 ,
0
00
000
0000
00
0000
0000
000
000
C-2 , C-3 , C-5 ; H-1 /C-6 , C-2 , C-3 , C-5 ; H-6 /C-4 ,
0
00
0000
0000
0000
ꢀ
C-5 ; H-6 /C-4 , C-5 . ESIMS: m/z 739 [M ꢀ H] .
Chrysoeriol 7-O-[(2-O-trans-feruloylglucuronopyranosyl) (1f2)]-
O-β-D-glucuronopyranoside (3): yellow amorphous powder; IR
9
52 g) was sucessively partitioned with ethyl acetate (EtOAc) and n-
butanol (BuOH) to give EtOAc- (HF-EtOAc, 353 g), BuOH- (HF-
BuOH, 136 g), and water-soluble fractions (HF-H O, 450 g). The
ꢀ
1
(KBr) νmax (cm ), 3358, 1716, 1657, 1605, 1593, 1514, 1262, 1187,
1159, 1088, 1056; UV (MeOH) λmax nm (log ε), 248 (3.95), 270 (3.88),
334 (4.00); (+NaOAc) λmax nm (log ε), 249 (3.95), 270 (3.88), 335
(4.00); (+AlCl ) λ nm (log ε), 277 (3.95), 296 (3.88), 338 (3.97),
2
EtOAc-soluble fraction was then subjected to silica gel (230ꢀ400 mesh)
column chromatography with successive elution by a Hex/EtOA/
MeOH gradient solvent system to obtain six fractions: A (57 g, Hex),
B (112 g, 25% EtOAc/Hex), C (79 g, 50% EtOAc/Hex), D (27 g, 75%
EtOAc/Hex), E (24 g, EtOAc), and F (48 g, MeOH). Fractions D and E
were separated on a Sephadex LH-20 column (MeOH) repeatedly to
3
max
387 (3.85); (+AlCl +HCl) λ nm (log ε), 278 (3.95), 296 (3.88), 337
3
max
1
(3.98), 387 (3.85); H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d ), δ 3.54 (1H, m,
6
0
0
0
00
000
H-2 ), 4.63 (1H, t, J = 8.5 Hz, H-2 ), 4.90 (1H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, anomeric
00
H-1 ), 5.37 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, anomeric H-1 ), 6.39 and 7.49 (1H each,
d, J = 15.5 Hz, feruloyl H-R and H-β), 6.41 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-6), 6.76
(1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, feruloyl H-5), 6.78 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-8), 6.93 (1H,
2
give 1 (38 mg), 4 (0.95 g), 8 (32 mg), and 9 (35 mg). The H O-soluble
fraction was chromatogramed over a Diaion HP-20 column and eluted
with a gradient of MeOH in H O. Fraction 75% MeOH/H O eluate was
0
2
2
d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-5 ), 6.94 (1H, s, H-3), 7.06 (1H, dd, J = 8.0, 2.0 Hz,
further purified on a Sephadex LH-20 column (80% MeOH/H O) to
feruloyl H-6), 7.24 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, feruloyl H-2), 7.56 (1H, dd, J = 8.5,
2
0 0
2.0 Hz, H-6 ), 7.57 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-2 ), 9.55 (1H, br s, feruloyl
yield 18 (252 mg) and 19 (123 mg). The MeOH eluates of the H
2
O-
0
13
soluble fraction (18 g) and HF-EtOAc-F (52 g) were combined with the
BuOH-soluble fraction and further separated on Sephadex LH-20
4-OH), 9.99 (1H, br s, 4 -OH), 12.96 (1H, br s, 5-OH); C NMR (125
MHz, DMSO-d ), δ 55.7 (q, OCH ), 56.0 (q, OCH ), 71.4 (d,
6
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
(
MeOH) and RP-18 (preparative and semipreparative) columns re-
peatedly to give 2 (127 mg), 3 (36 mg), 5 (1.79 g), 6 (64 mg), 7 (85 mg),
0 (78 mg), 11 (141 mg), 12 (108 mg), 13 (43 mg), 14 (34 mg), 15 (18
glucuronopyranosyl-C-4 ), 71.9 (d, glucuronopyranosyl-C-4 ), 73.4
0
0
00
(d, glucuronopyranosyl-C-2 ), 73.9 (d, glucuronopyranosyl-C-3 ), 74.9
0
0
0
0
0
1
(d, glucuronopyranosyl-C-5 ), 75.0 (d, glucuronopyranosyl-C-3 ),
000
75.6 (d, glucuronopyranosyl-C-5 ), 79.9 (d, glucuronopyranosyl-C-
mg), 16 (25 mg), and 17 (34 mg).
0
00
00
n-Butyl 4-trans-O-caffeoylquinate (1): colorless amorphous powder;
2 ), 94.9 (d, C-8), 97.2 (glucuronopyranosyl-C-1 ), 99.2 (d, C-6),
100.7 (d, glucuronopyranosyl-C-1 ), 103.5 (s, C-3), 105.5 (s, C-10),
110.4 (d, C-2 ). 111.2 (d, feruloyl-C-2), 115.0 (d, feruloyl-C-R), 115.5
(d, feruloyl-C-5), 115.8 (d, C-5 ), 120.5 (d, C-6 ), 121.5 (s, feruloyl
C-1), 122.9 (d, feruloyl C-6), 125.8 (s, C-1 ), 144.6 (d, feruloyl C-β),
147.9 (s, C-3 ), 148.1 (s, feruloyl C-3 ), 149.2 (s, feruloyl C-4), 150.9 (s,
2
5
ꢀ1
000
[
1
2
R]
D
= ꢀ8.08° (MeOH, c 0.15); IR (KBr) νmax (cm ), 3406, 1718,
0
686, 1627, 1508, 1441, 1069, 1049, 934; UV (MeOH) λ , nm (log ε),
20 (3.82), 233 (3.78), 243 (3.78), 295 (3.89), 329 (3.98); H NMR
500 MHz, CD
max
1
0
0
0
0
(
3
0
OD), δ 0.93 (3H, t, J = 7.2 Hz, H-4 ), 1.41 (2H, hepta,
0
0
0
J = 7.2 Hz, H-3 ), 1.64 (2H, hepta, J = 7.2 Hz, H-2 ), 2.01 (1H, dd, J =
0
1
6
3.2, 10.2 Hz, H-6a), 2.06 (1H, m, H-2a), 2.16ꢀ2.20 (2H, m, H-2b, -
C-4 ), 156.9 (s, C-9), 161.2 (s, C-5), 162.2 (s, C-7), 164.2 (s, C-2), 165.8
0
00
b), 4.13 (2H, hepta, J = 7.2 Hz, H-1 ), 4.28 (1H, ddd, J = 10.2, 9.6, 4.8
(s, feruloyl CdO), 169.9 (s, glucuronopyranosyl C-6 ), 170.1 (s,
000
Hz, w1/2 = 20.0 Hz, H-3), 4.31 (1H, m, Jw1/2 = 7.6 Hz, H-5), 4.83 (1H,
glucuronopyranosyl C-6 ), 182.1 (s, C-4). Key HMBC correlations:
8
790
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf201166b |J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 8789–8795