An Efficient and Cost-Effective Organic Catalyst
1251
2
h. Among the conditions (EtOH, THF, H O, MeCN,
2
General Procedure for the Synthesis of Quinolines
A mixture of 1.0 mmol 2-aminoaryl ketone, 1.1 mmol ꢀ-CH
toluene, and solvent-free) screened, solvent-free was
demonstrated as the best condition. Further studies
showed that 1–5 mol% of catalyst were also efficient
in this reaction at the expense of reaction time
acid, and 0.013g oxalic acid (0.1mmol) was heated under
ꢁ
solvent-free conditions with stirring at 80 C for 2 h. After
completion of the reaction as indicated by TLC (eluent: n-
hexane=ethyl acetate ¼ 2=1) the reaction mixture was washed
3
(5 mol%: 5 h, 90% yield; 1 mol%, 1 d, 88% yield).
with 2ꢂ10cm H O, and filtered. The crude solid product
2
To demonstrate the generality of this method, we next
investigated the scope of this reaction (Scheme 1)
and the results are summarized in Table 1.
As shown in Table 1, this method is equally effec-
tive for both cyclic and acyclic ketones. Substituted
was recrystallised from ethanol.
Acknowledgement
Financial support by the Research Council of Shahid Beheshti
University is gratefully acknowledged.
2
-aminoaryl ketones, such as 2-aminobenzophenone
and 2-amino-5-chlorobenzophenone reacted smooth-
ly with methylene ketones to produce a range of
quinoline derivatives. Complete conversion and good
to excellent isolated yields were observed for all
substrates employed. This reaction is very clean and
free from side reactions such as self-condensation of
ketones, which is normally observed under basic con-
ditions. In the absence of catalyst, the reaction did
not yield any product even after long reaction times.
Interestingly, cyclic ketones, such as cyclopenta-
none, cyclohexanone, dimedone, and 1,3-cyclohexa-
dione also underwent smooth condensation with
References
[
[
1] a) Morimoto Y, Matsuda F, Shirahama H (1991) Synlett
202; b) Michael JP (1997) Nat Prod Rep 14: 605
2] a) Markees DG, Dewey VC, Kidder GW (1970) J Med
Chem 13: 324; b) Roma G, Braccio MD, Grossi G,
Mattioli F, Ghia M (2000) Eur J Med Chem 35: 1021;
c) Chen YL, Fang KC, Sheu JY, Hsu SL, Tzeng CC
(2001) J Med Chem 44: 2374
[3] a) Friedlander P (1882) Ber Dtsch Chem Ges 15: 2572;
b) Abass M (2005) Heterocycles 65: 901; c) Kouznetsov
VV, M e´ ndez LYV, G o´ mez CMM (2005) Curr Org Chem
9: 141
2-aminoaryl ketones to afford the respective tricyclic
quinolines (Table 1, entries 3–10).
[
4] a) Katritzky AR, Arend M (1998) J Org Chem 63: 9989;
b) Cacchi S, Fabrizi G, Marinelli F (1999) Synlett 401;
c) Ranu BC, Hajra A, Jana U (2000) Tetrahedron
Lett 41: 531; d) Cho CS, Oh BH, Kim JS, Kim TJ,
Shim SC (2000) Chem Commun 1885; e) Arisawa M,
Theeraladanon C, Nishida A, Nakagawa M (2001) Tet-
rahedron Lett 42: 8029; f) Jiang B, Si YG (2002) J Org
Chem 67: 9449; g) Theoclitou ME, Robinson LA (2002)
Tetrahedron Lett 43: 3907
In conclusion, we describe an efficient route for
the synthesis of quinolines and polycyclic quinolines
utilizing oxalic acid as an organic catalyst via
Friedl a¨ nder annulation. This method not only pro-
vides an excellent complement to quinoline syn-
thesis via Friedl a¨ nder annulation, but also avoids
the use of hazardous acids or bases and harsh re-
action conditions. The advantages of this method
include good substrate generality, the use of inex-
pensive reagents and catalyst under mild condi-
tions, and experimental operational ease. Reactions
employing oxalic acid as a catalyst for other organ-
ic transformations are currently under investigation
in our research group, and will be reported in due
course.
[5] a) Fehnel EA (1966) J Org Chem 31: 2899; b) Gladiali S,
Chelucci G, Mudadu MS, Gastaut MA, Thummel RP
(2001) J Org Chem 66: 400; c) Dormer PG, Eng KK,
Farr RN, Humphrey GR, McWilliams JC, Reider PJ,
Sager JW, Volante RP (2003) J Org Chem 68: 467
6] a) Sliskovic DR, Picard JA, Roark WH, Roth BD,
Ferguson E, Krause BR, Newton RS, Sekerke C, Shaw
MK (1991) J Med Chem 34: 367; b) Zolfigol MA, Salehi
P, Ghaderi A, Shiri M, Tanbakouchian Z (2007) J Mol
Catal A Chem 259: 253; c) Suzuki M, Iwasaki H,
Fujikawa Y, Kitahara M, Sakashita M, Sakoda R
[
(2001) Bioorg Med Chem 9: 2727; d) Song SJ, Cho
SJ, Park DK, Kwon TW, Jenekhe SA (2003) Tetrahedron
Lett 44: 255; e) Yadav JS, Rao PP, Sreenu D, Rao RS,
Kumar VN, Nagaiah K, Prasad AR (2005) Tetrahedron
Lett 46: 7249; f) Shaabani A, Soleimani E, Badri A
(2007) Synth Commun 37: 629; g) Shaabani A,
Soleimani E, Badri A (2006) Monatsh Chem 137: 181
Experimental
Melting points were obtained in open capillary tubes and were
measured on an electrothermal 9200 apparatus. Mass spectra
were recorded on a Shimadzu QP 1100 BX mass spectrome-
ter. IR spectra were recorded on KBr pellets on a Shimadzu
IR-470 spectrophotometer. H and C NMR spectra were
determined on a Bruker 300 DRX Avance instrument at 300
and 75 MHz.
1
13
[7] a) McNaughton BR, Miller BL (2003) Org Lett 5: 4257;
b) Yadav JS, Reddy BVS, Premalatha K (2004) Synlett
963; c) Wang J, Fan X, Zhang X, Han LCan (2004)