9708
A. Tewari et al. / Tetrahedron 61 (2005) 9705–9709
significantly slower at this temperature. Nevertheless, in
some cases the use of lower reaction temperatures can be
reasonable if one or both of the substrates contain sensitive
groups. As an example the amination of 2-chloropyridine
with N-(tert-butoxycarbonyl)piperazine is presented, which
gave an excellent yield (98%) at 80 8C (Table 4, entry 3).
3.1.3. N,N-Di-n-butylaniline. MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%): 205
[MC], 162, 120, 105, 77.
3.1.4. N-tert-Butyl-2,6-dimethylaniline. MS (EI, 70 eV):
m/z (%): 177, 162, 121.
3.1.5. N-(4-Cyanophenyl)morpholine. MS (EI, 70 eV):
m/z (%): 188 [MC], 130, 102.
In summary, we have shown that phosphonium salts of
alkyl-di-(1-adamantyl)phosphines allow for an efficient
synthesis of a variety of substituted anilines from aryl or
heteroaryl chlorides and amines. Good to excellent yields
(75–99%) are obtained at comparatively low catalyst
concentration (0.5 mol% Pd(OAc)2; 120 8C). By simply
reducing the metal and ligand amount optimized catalyst
turnover numbers up to ca. 10,000 have been observed. In
addition, the coupling reactions proceed under milder
conditions (60–80 8C), albeit with higher catalyst loading.
3.1.6. N-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-N-methylaniline. MS (EI,
70 eV): m/z (%): 213 [MC], 198, 77.
3.1.7. N-Methyl-N-[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]aniline.
MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%): 251 [MC], 77.
3.1.8. N-Methyl-N-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]aniline.
MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%): 251 [MC], 145, 77.
An important advantage of the presented method is the easy
handling of catalyst and ligand precursors. Hence, it is not
necessary to exclude strictly air or moisture. Due to the
modular synthesis of cataCXiumw A ligands a fine tuning of
the ligand properties for other substrates is easily possible
and should lead to further improved catalyst performance.
3.1.9. N-(2-Pyridyl)morpholine. MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%):
164 [MC], 133, 107, 79.
3.1.10. N-Benzyl-N0-(2-quinolyl)piperazine. Yellow solid;
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): dZ7.78 (d, 3J(H,H)Z9.1 Hz,
3
3
1H), 7.61 (d, J(H,H)Z8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (d, J(H,H)Z8.
3 Hz, 1H), 7.45 (m, 1H), 7.21 (m, 6H), 6.87 (d, 3J(H,H)Z9.
3 Hz, 1H), 3.68 (t, 3J(H,H)Z5.1 Hz, 4H), 3.49 (s, 2H), 2.51
3
(t, J(H,H)Z5.1 Hz, 4H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3):
3. Experimental
dZ157.9, 148.3, 137.8, 129.9, 129.7, 128.7, 127.6, 127.0,
123.5, 122.7, 109.9, 63.6, 53.5, 44.5; MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z
(%): 303 [MC], 157, 128, 91.
Chemicals were obtained from Aldrich, Fluka and Merck
KGaA and used without further purification. Solvents were
1
dried according to standard procedures. H and 13C NMR
3.1.11. N-tert-Butoxycarbonyl-N0-(2-pyridyl)piperazine.
chemical shifts refer to tetramethylsilane (0 ppm) and
CDCl3 (77.0 ppm), respectively. Column chromatography
was carried out using silica gel 60 (0.063–0.2 mm Fluka).
1
Yellow solid; H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3): dZ8.18 (m,
1H), 7.48 (m, 1H), 6.63 (m, 2H), 3.52 (s (br), 8H), 1.47 (s,
9H); 13C NMR (63 MHz, CDCl3): dZ159.3, 154.8, 148.0,
137.6, 113.6, 107.2, 79.9, 45.1, 43.3 (br), 28.4; MS (EI,
70 eV): m/z (%): 263 [MC], 190, 120, 107, 78.
3.1. General procedure (Buchwald–Hartwig amination)
A 30 mL pressure tube was loaded with Pd(OAc)2 (5.6 mg,
0.025 mmol), the ligand precursor (0.050 mmol), and
NaOtBu (577 mg, 6.0 mmol) and was purged with argon.
Then, toluene (5 mL), the aryl chloride (5.0 mmol), and the
amine (6.0 mmol) were added successively. The mixture
was stirred for 20 h at 120 8C. After cooling to room
temperature the mixture was diluted with diethyl ether
(5 mL) and washed with water (10 mL). The organic phase
was dried over MgSO4, concentrated under vacuum and the
product was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl
acetate/n-hexane or acetone/n-hexane). Alternatively,
diethyleneglycol di-n-butyl ether or hexadecane was
added as internal standard and quantitative analysis was
done by gas chromatography. The commercially available
products were identified by comparison of their GC/MS data
with the data of authentic samples, known products were
characterized by NMR and mass spectroscopy (for more
data see Ref. 4c and cited literature there).
Acknowledgements
This work has been financed by the State of Mecklenburg-
Vorpommern and the Bundesministerium fu¨r Bildung und
Forschung (BMBF).
References and notes
1. (a) Schlummer, B.; Scholz, U. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346,
1599–1626. (b) Hartwig, J. F. In Negishi, E.-I., Ed.; Handbook
of Organopalladium Chemistry for Organic Synthesis;
Wiley-Interscience: New York, 2002; Vol. 1; p 1051. (c)
Yang, B. H.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 576,
125–146.
2. (a) Christmann, U.; Vilar, R. Angew. Chem. 2005, 117,
370–378. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 366–374. (b)
Bedford, R. B.; Cazin, C. S. J.; Holder, D. Coord. Chem. Rev.
2004, 248, 2283–2321. (c) Urgaonkar, S.; Verkade, J. G. J.
Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 9135–9142. (d) Bedford, R. B.; Blake,
M. E. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 1107–1110. (e) Stauffer,
S. R.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 6977–6985.
3.1.1. N-Phenylmorpholine. MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%): 163
[MC], 105, 77.
3.1.2. Methyldiphenylamine. MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%):
183 [MC], 167, 104, 77.