6
38
J . Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 638-641
Tota l Syn th esis of In d oles fr om Tr ich olom a
Sp ecies via Ba r toli/Heter oa r yl Ra d ica l
Meth od ologies
To test the power of this methodology, we imagined
using this approach in a short and efficient synthesis of
2
,4-dimethylindole 1, 4-(hydroxymethyl)-2-methylindole
, and 4-(methoxymethyl)-2-methylindole 3, three alka-
2
loids that have recently been isolated from two species
of European Basidomycetes (Tricholoma virgatum and
Tricholoma sciodes).9
Adrian Dobbs*
Department of Chemistry, The Open University,
Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, U.K.
Received November 20, 2000
In tr od u ction
Resu lts a n d Discu ssion
The Bartoli indole synthesis is the treatment of an
ortho-substituted nitro-aromatic compound with 3 equiv
of vinylmagnesium bromide to give the 7-substituted
indole,1 and this method has rapidly become the shortest
and most flexible synthesis for indoles of this sub-
stitution pattern. We have recently reported an exten-
sion to this methodology, suggesting that it may not be
limited exclusively to the synthesis of 7-substituted
indoles but that modest yields of other substitution
patterns may also be obtained via this methodology.6
However, there is no doubt that the best yields are
obtained when the nitro-aromatic compound possesses
an ortho substituent, enforcing selectivity in the 3,3-
sigmatropic rearrangement and subsequent cyclization
step. This ortho substituent is, of course, undesirable in
the synthesis of many indoles when a Bartoli approach
may be advantageous.
A number of model reactions were first performed to
examine the scope of the proposed reaction sequence. The
Bartoli reaction of o-bromonitrobenzene with three simple
vinyl Grignard reagents proceeded well and in yields
comparable and consistent with previously reported
values (Table 1, entries A-C).1 The introduction of and
variation in the substituent on the vinyl Grignard
reagent seemed to have little effect on the indole syn-
thesis. This is of particular interest when employing a
cyclic vinyl Grignard reagent 1-cyclohexenylmagnesium
bromide (Table 1, entry D) where the immediate prod-
uct formed is a carbazole derivative, 8-bromo-2,3,4,9-
tetrahydro-1H-carbazole (and this is probably the short-
est synthesis to date of this class of compound). Even
more heavily substituted nitroarenes (Table 1, entries E
and F) still gave pleasing yields under the Bartoli
reaction conditions. Thus, the Bartoli reaction represents
a rapid route to a range of complex 7-bromo-substituted
indoles.
,2
1
-5
,2,6
We have also been interested in the generation and
use of heteroaryl free radicals for some time now and
have reported the radical reactions and cyclizations of
indoles bearing halogen substituents at both the 2- and
7
We envisaged a combination of these two methodolo-
The second stage in the proposed sequence was the
radical reduction of the newly synthesized 7-bromoin-
doles to give the 7-unsubstituted indoles. This reaction
was investigated using all the 7-bromoindoles prepared.
First was the reduction of 7-bromoindole with tributyltin
hydride under standard conditions (1.2 equiv of tribu-
tyltin hydride (compared to 7-bromoindole) and AIBN as
initiator in toluene at 110 °C) to give the parent com-
pound, indole. It was pleasing to find that the reaction
proceeded in near-quantitative yields (Table 1, entry A).
Therefore, these conditions were employed for all sub-
sequent reductions. No evidence of intermolecular radical
combination or addition between indoles was observed,
irrespective of dilution or concentration of the reactants,
suggesting that these reductions are proceeding very
rapidly (and in a manner consistent with our previously
-positions.3
,7,8
gies, whereby a range of o-bromonitrobenzenes are
treated under Bartoli conditions with various vinyl
Grignard reagents (using the o-bromine atom to direct
the cyclization) and then subsequently reduced using the
heteroaryl radical methodology to replace the halogen
and give a 7-unsubstituted indole, i.e., effectively using
the bromine as a labile protecting group (Scheme 1). This
method could give a significant reduction in the number
of steps required for the synthesis of many complex
indoles and also offers the advantage that many func-
tionalities are tolerant to radical-generating conditions
without the need for protection.
3
*
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: +44 1908
58327.
1) Bartoli, G.; Palmieri, G.; Bosco, M.; Dalpozzo, R. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1989, 30, 2129-2132.
2) Bartoli, G.; Bosco, M.; Dalpozzo, R.; Palmieri, G.; Marcantoni,
E. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1991, 2757-2761.
3) Dobbs, A. P.; J ones, K.; Veal, K. T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38,
379-5382.
4) Dobson, D.; Todd, A.; Gilmore, J . Synth. Commun. 1991, 21,
reported results ). Almost identical results were obtained
8
with all the substrates, including a double reduction of
7-bromo-4-bromomethylindole (Table 1, entry F).
Therefore, the combination of these two methodssa
Bartoli reaction using o-bromonitrobenzenes followed by
radical reductionsrepresents a rapid and very easy route
to a range of indoles of varying substitution pattern.
Encouraged by these results, our attention was turned
to employing the method to the synthesis of various
(
(
(
5
6
(
11-617.
(
(
(
5) Dobson, D. R.; Gilmore, J .; Long, D. A. Synlett 1992, 79-80.
6) Dobbs, A. P.; Voyle, M.; Whittall, N. Synlett 1999, 1594-1596.
7) Dobbs, A. P.; J ones, K.; Veal, K. T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36,
4
2
857-4860.
8) Dobbs, A. P.; J ones, K.; Veal, K. T. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 2149-
160.
(
(9) Garlaschelli, L.; Pang, Z. J .; Sterner, O.; Vidari, G. Tetrahedron
1994, 50, 3571-3574.
1
0.1021/jo0057396 CCC: $20.00 © 2001 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 12/22/2000