have been few reports on intermolecular reactions of unac-
tivated alkenes.5 Recently, the Au-catalyzed hydroamination
of unactivated alkenes with reactive benzenesulfonamides
was demonstrated6 and several examples for acid-catalyzed
hydroaminations were also reported.7 However, these reaction
systems have some disadvantages: the need for expensive
and toxic catalysts and the significant limitations of amide
groups as aminating reagents. As an alternative to homoge-
neous metal-catalyzed addition reactions to unactivated
alkenes, our group has reported proton-exchanged montmo-
rillonite (H-mont)-mediated addition reactions of 1,3-dicar-
bonyl compounds.8 In the course of our ongoing studies
exploring practical organic transformations, the H-mont
catalyst was proven to be efficient for the intermolecular
hydroamination of unactivated alkenes with various nitrogen
nucleophiles (eq 1). The H-mont catalyst, with its unique
acid sites, exhibits the promising advantages of a simple
workup procedure, reusability, and high catalytic activity.
This is the first report concerning the intermolecular
hydroamination of unactiVated alkenes with amides using
acid catalysts. This catalyst system was also applicable to
the substitution reaction of alcohols with amides and anilines
(eq 2).
Hydroamination of cyclohexene (1a) with p-toluene-
sulfonamide (2a) was carried out in the presence of various
heterogeneous and homogeneous acids, as summarized in
Table 1. The H-mont gave the highest yield of N-cyclohexyl
Table 1. Hydroamination of 1a with 2a Using Acid Catalystsa
yield of
3a (%)b
selectivity of
3a (%)b
entry
catalyst
H-mont
1
2
90
63
20
trace
trace
trace
n.r.
57
>99
>99
>99
-
-
-
H-USY
3
4
H-mordenite
H-ZSM-5
5
6
7
8
mont K10
SO42-/ZrO2
Na+-mont
p-TsOH‚H2Oc
-
90
c
9
H2SO4
44
nr
>99
-
10
none
a Reaction conditions: 1a (2.0 mmol), 2a (1.0 mmol), catalyst (0.1 g),
n-heptane (2 mL), 2 h, 150 °C. b Determined by GC analysis. c 0.1 mmol.
p-toluenesulfonamide (3a) (entry 1). A moderate yield of
the product was obtained in the H-USY-catalyzed reaction
(entry 2), and other solid acids, such as H-ZSM-5, mont K10,
SO42-/ZrO2, and H-mordenite, were less active (entries 3-6).
Notably, the H-mont catalyst showed higher activity than
the homogeneous acids, p-toluenesulfonic acid and H2SO4
(entries 7 and 8).
Table 2 shows the scope of the hydroamination reaction
of various alkenes with amides using the H-mont catalyst.
The hydroamination of norbornene (1b) with para-substituted
benzenesulfonamide derivatives proceeded successfully, af-
fording the corresponding adducts with toleration of func-
tional groups (entries 1-5). Both cyclic and acyclic unac-
tivated alkenes, such as cyclopentene and 1-hexene, were
found to be good acceptors in the reaction with 2a (entries
6-9).9 For hydroamination of inert alkenes with alkylsul-
fonamides, the addition reaction of methanesulfonamide to
1b proceeded to afford N-bicyclo[2.2.1]hept-2-yl methane-
sulfonamide in a 96% yield (entry 11). This H-mont catalyst
also worked well under a mild reaction temperature (entries
2 and 12). To extend the scope of the amides, aromatic,
heteroaromatic, and aliphatic carboxamides were investigated
as potential donors in the reaction of 1b (entries 13-17).
All of these carboxamides underwent hydroamination with
The H-mont was obtained via treatment of a Na+-mont
with aqueous hydrogen chloride. Elemental analysis showed
a 98.9% exchange degree of sodium cations to protons. It
was verified via XRD studies that the layered structure of
the H-mont was retained, and NH3 TPD analysis revealed
that the strength (∆H) and quantity of the acid sites in the
H-mont were 111 kJ mol-1 and 0.86 mmol g-1, respectively.8
(3) (a) Mu¨ller, T. E.; Beller, M. Chem. ReV. 1998, 98, 675. (b) Brunet,
J. J.; Neibecker, D. In Catalytic Heterofunctionalization; Togni, A.,
Gru¨tzmacher, H., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: New York, 2001; p 91. (c) Beller,
M.; Breindl, C.; Eichberger, M.; Hartung, C. G.; Seayad, J.; Thiel, O. R.;
Tillack, A.; Trauthwein, H. Synlett 2002, 1579. (d) Bystschkov, I.; Doye,
S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 935. (e) Roesky, P. W.; Mu¨ller, T. E. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 2708. (f) Hong, S.; Marks, T. J. Acc. Chem. Res.
2004, 37, 673.
(4) For recent examples of metal-catalyzed hydroaminations, see: (a)
Tada, M.; Shimamoto, M.; Sasaki, T.; Iwasawa, Y. Chem. Commun. 2004,
2562. (b) Lauterwasser, F.; Hayes, P. G.; Bra¨se, S.; Piers, W. E.; Schafer,
L. L. Organometallics 2004, 23, 2234. (c) Hultzsch, K. C.; Hampel, F.;
Wagner, T. Organometallics 2004, 23, 2601. (d) Gribkov, D. V.; Hultzsch,
K. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5542. (e) Bender, C. F.;
Widenhoefer, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1070. (f) Crimmin, M. R.;
Casely, I. J.; Hill, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8294. (g) Waser, J.;
Nambu, H.; Carreira, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8294. (h) Karshtedt,
D.; Bell, A. T.; Tilly, T. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12640. (i)
Widenhoefer, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1747. (j) Qin, H.;
Yamagiwa, N.; Matsunaga, S.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
1611. (k) Gribkov, D. V.; Hultzsch, K. C.; Hampel, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006, 128, 3748.
(7) For acid-catalyzed hydroamination, see: (a) Chauvel, A.; Delmon,
B.; Ho¨lderich, W. F. Appl. Catal. A General 1994, 115, 173. (b) Schlummer,
B.; Hartwig, J. F. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1471. (c) Anderson, L. L.; Arnold, J.;
Bergman, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 14542. (d) Yin, Y.; Zhao,
G. Heterocycles 2006, 68, 23.
(8) Motokura, K.; Fujita, N.; Mori, K.; Mizugaki, T.; Ebitani, K.; Kaneda,
K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2605.
(5) Intermolecular reaction with ethylene and propylene: (a) Brunet, J.-
J.; Cadena, M.; Chu, N. C.; Diallo, O.; Jacob, K.; Mothes, E. Organome-
tallics 2004, 23, 1264. (b) Wang, X.; Widenhoefer, R. A. Organometallics
2004, 23, 1649. With dienes: (c) Brouwer, C.; He, C. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2006, 45, 1744.
(9) Unfortunately, the reaction of styrene derivatives did not give desired
hydroamination products due to rapid oligomerization.
(6) Zhang, J.; Yang, C.-G.; He, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1798.
4618
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 20, 2006