D-S. Park et al.: Effect of Si N O content on the microstructure, properties, and erosion of silicon nitride–Si N O in situ composites
2
2
2 2
volume percent of Si N O was increased, the fracture
2
2
toughness of the composite increased and the width of
the silicon nitride grain decreased. Elastic moduli of the
in situ composites were close to the values predicted by
the rule of mixture of the two constituents, –Si N and
3
4
Si N O. The erosion rate decreased as the Si N O con-
2
2
2 2
tent was increased in part due to the increased fracture
toughness and the reduced grain size. Erosion of the
composites occurred primarily by grain dislodgment. At
a high impact angle, micro-chipping due to severe trans-
granular fracture also occurred in the sample without
Si N O.
2
2
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by the National Research
Laboratory program of the Korean Ministry of Science
and Technology.
FIG. 10. SEM micrograph of eroded sample SO-12. The impact angle
was 90°. The arrow indicates the scratch mark.
The erosion rates of the samples shown in Fig. 8 can
also be explained in terms of their grain sizes. From the
target’s perspective, the impacts by the erodents are simi-
lar to the repeated contacts in the contact fatigue. As
REFERENCES
1
. S. Wada, in Erosion of Ceramic Materials, edited by J.E. Ritter
(Key Engineering Materials, Trans Tech Publications, Uetikon-
Zuerich, Switzerland, 1992), Vol. 71, p. 51.
1
5
2. Y. Zhang, Y-B. Cheng, and S. Lathabai, J. Eur. Ceram. 21, 2435
2001).
reported by Lawn, the intergranular crack density in the
contact zone of the flat sample increased as the grain size
of the sample was increased. Similarly, more intergranu-
lar cracks were generated by the impact of the erodents,
and the erosion rate increased as the grain size was in-
creased. Elastic modulus may affect the erosion rate as
(
3. B. Lawn, in Fracture of Brittle Solids, 2nd ed. (Cambridge Uni-
versity Press, London, United Kingdom, 1993), pp. 303–304.
4. D-M. Liu, J-T. Lin, and R.R-R. Lee, Ceram. Int. 24, 217 (1998).
5. M. Ohashi, S. Kanzaki, and H. Tabata, Nippon Seramikkusu
Kyokai Gakujutsu Ronbunshi, 96, 1073 (1988).
1
6. H. Emoto, M. Mitomo, C-M. Wang, H. Hirosturu, and T. Inaba,
appeared in one of the proposed equations. However,
J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 18, 527 (1998).
the erosion rate was dependent on the ratio of the elastic
modulus to the hardness in that equation, and the differ-
ence among those ratios of the current in situ composites
was not big enough to explain the difference among the
measured erosion rates.
7
. S.M. Wiedhorn and B.J. Hockey, J. Mater. Sci. 18, 766 (1983).
8. S. Wada, J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 104, 247 (1996).
9. A.G. Evans and E.A. Charles, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 59, 371 (1976).
0. D-S. Park, T-W. Roh, B-D. Han, H-D. Kim, and C. Park, J. Eur.
Ceram. Soc. 22, 535 (2002).
1
1
1
1
1
1. F. Lee, M.S. Sandlin, and K.J. Bowman, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76,
1
793 (1993).
2. C. Wang, H. Emoto, and M. Mitomo, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 81,
125 (1998).
3. M. Ohashi, K. Nakamura, K. Hirao, M. Toriyama, and S. Kanzaki,
Ceram. Int. 23, 27 (1997).
IV. CONCLUSION
1
The XRD pattern of hot-pressed silicon nitride–
Si N O in situ composite exhibited strong (200) and
2
2
4. S.J. Cho, B.J. Hockey, B.R. Lawn, and S.J. Bennison, J. Am. Ce-
(
111) Si N O peaks from the surface perpendicular
2 2
ram. Soc. 72, 1249 (1989).
and parallel to the pressing direction, respectively. As the
15. B.R. Lawn, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 81, 1977 (1988).
2
280
J. Mater. Res., Vol. 17, No. 9, Sep 2002
Downloaded: 14 Mar 2015
IP address: 139.86.13.152