5
634
J . Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 5634-5637
Nu cleop h ilic Su bstitu tion of Meth yl
â-Ch lor o-(3-br om o-2,4,6-tr im eth yl)cin n a m a te
study, the corresponding esters seem to be suitable
substrates. Such an approach was applied by Cabaret,
5
Welvart, and co-workers in a related system.
Two practical problems that may complicate the study
are the possibility of a substitution via elimination-
addition and the possibility of a racemization of the
precursor due to a low rotational barrier. Both problems
are reduced with the R-Me compound ArC(Cl)dC(Me)-
Michal Beit Yannai and Zvi Rappoport*
Department of Organic Chemistry, The Hebrew University,
J erusalem 91904, Israel
Received J anuary 28, 1997
CO
2
3 6
Me (Ar ) 3-Br-2,4,6-Me C H) since the barrier in the
acids is relatively high and there is no vinylic hydrogen
We are looking for probes for delineating the mecha-
nism of bimolecular nucleophilic vinylic substitution
proceeding by an initial nucleophilic attack on the double
available for elimination.4
a
In a study of this ester, we found that dechlorocar-
bomethoxylation reaction with a loss of both the Cl and
1
bond (the “addition-elimination” route). With mildly
2
the CO Me groups led to an acetylene and not to a
activated systems the stronger evidence for a multistep
route via an intermediate carbanion (eq 1) (i.e., A being
an intermediate and not a transition state) is the element
6
substitution product. This was apparently due to the
excessive steric hindrance to approach to the vinylic
carbon.
effect (the relative rates k when X ) F, Cl, Br, e.g., kBr
Cl), which is not always available.
/
2
k
Consequently, in the present work, we prepared the
R-H analog. It is known that racemization of the acid
takes place in n-BuOH with a half-life of 206 min at
reflux. Moreover, the system is a priori prone to R,â-
k
9
-X-
RC(X)dCYY′ + Nu-
8 RC(X)(Nu)-YY′
8
A
4
elimination. However, according to Adams, the isomer
RC(Nu)dCYY′ (1)
studied is the E isomer where the hydrogen and chlorine
are cis to one another so that E2 elimination may be
difficult.
The study of this system therefore imposes several
practical problems. First, the substitution should be
conducted at room temperature in order to avoid thermal
racemization. Second, the requirements for the involve-
ment of the elimination-addition route should also be
investigated.
-
X ) leaving group; Nu ) nucleophile; Y, Y′ )
activating groups
â-Halocinnamates belong to this class of compounds.
Methyl â-chlorocinnamates (ArC(Cl))CHCO Me, Ar )
Ph, p-ClC , p-Tol) undergo elimination with MeO /
2
-
6
H
4
MeOH,3 but with PhS , substitution takes place, giving
a-c
-
3
d
the retained substitution product. This and the forma-
tion of the isomeric E/Z substitution products in the
-
+
Resu lts a n d Discu ssion
addition of PhS /H to the corresponding methyl propi-
olates (ArCtCCO Me) exclude an elimination-addition
route, except when Ar ) p-O NC when the substitu-
2
Cr ysta l Str u ctu r e of E-1. The crystal structure of
E-1 was determined for three reasons. (a) The configu-
ration of the acid precursor to E-1 was given by Adams
as E on the basis of chemical evidence and analogy with
o,o′-substituted biphenyls, and a corroboration for this
was sought. (b) The structures of the analogous methyl
â-chlorocinnamates were determined by Youssef et al.
on the basis of UV and NMR spectra of the acids and
esters. By using additivity calculations of H NMR
chemical shifts, they assigned a Z-configuration to the
2
6 4
H
tion gives E/Z substitution products mixture.
Adams and co-workers have prepared and resolved to
enantiomers two pairs of â-chlorocinnamic acids: the
R-Me4 and R-H with 3-bromo-2,4,6-trimethyl substit-
uents; i.e., the aryl group is 3-bromomesityl. The optical
activity results from hindered rotation around the
Ar-Cdbond due to the steric interaction of the o-Me
substituents with the double-bond substituents, which
lead to atropisomerism. We reasoned that if a carbanion
a
4b
3
1
2
esters studied whose dCH and CO Me signals were
â
A with a finite lifetime is formed by attack on C giving
calculated to be at a lower field than for the E isomers.
a carbanion, the locked geometry may be relaxed, leading
to a racemized product, whereas if the reaction is
concerted (i.e., A is a transition state) this will not
happen. Since the activation by a carboxyl is low and
the negative charge on a carboxylate may complicate the
7
Similar additivity calculations for the vinylic hydrogen
of E-1 and Z-1, using the increment value for Ar for our
tetrasubstituted phenyl group, gave δ values of 6.18 and
.49 ppm, respectively. Since the observed value was δ
.48 ppm, this probe suggest that our ester is Z-1. This
6
6
is in contrast with Adams’ assignment of configuration
of the acid if we assume that the configuration is retained
(
1) (a) Rappoport, Z. Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 1969, 7, 1. (b) Modena,
G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1971, 4, 73. (c) Rappoport, Z. Acc. Chem. Res. 1981,
4, 7. (d) Shainyan, B. Russ. Chem. Rev. 1986, 55, 511. (e) Rappoport,
Z. Acc. Chem. Res. 1992, 25, 474.
2) (a) Bunnett, J . F.; Garbisch, E. W., J r.; Pruitt, H. M. J . Am.
6
1
on esterification. We have previously shown that with
+
2 2
the R-Me acid esterification by CH N or with MeOH/H
(
gives the same (retained) geometrical isomer. Assuming
Chem. Soc. 1957, 79, 385. For element effect in vinylic systems, see
ref 1 and: (b) Rappoport, Z.; Topol, A. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2
975, 863. (c) Rappoport, Z.; Rav-Acha, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25,
17. (d) Avramovitch, B.; Weyerstahl, P.; Rappoport, Z. J . Am. Chem.
that this applies also for the R-H acid, this raises a
1
1
Soc. 1987, 109, 6687. (e) Hoz, S.; Basch, H.; Wolk, J . L.; Rappoport,
Z.; Goldberg, M. J . Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 5424.
(5) Cabaret, D.; Maigret, N.; Welvart, Z.; Onong, K. N. V.; Gaud-
emer, A. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 2870.
(6) Beit-Yannai, M.; Rappoport, Z. J . Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 3553.
(7) Silverstein, R. M.; Bassler, G. C.; Morrill, T. C. Spectrometric
Identification of Organic Compounds, 5th ed.; Wiley: New York, 1991;
p 215.
(
3) (a) Youssef, A.-H. A.; Abdel-Reheim, A. G. Ind. J . Chem. Sect. B
1
976, 14B, 101. (b) Youssef, A.-H. A.; Abdel-Maksoud, H. M.; Youssef,
A.-H. A. J . Org. Chem. 1975, 40, 3227. (c) Youssef, A.-H. A.; Sharaf,
S. M.; El-Sadany, S. K.; Hamid, E. A. Ind. J . Chem. 1982, 21B, 359.
(
d) J . Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 3813.
4) (a) Adams, R.; Miller, A. W. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1940, 62, 53. (b)
Adams, R.; Anderson, A. W.; Miller, M. W. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1941,
3, 1589.
(8) The authors have deposited the atomic coordinates for E-1 with
the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre. The coordinates can be
obtained, on request, from the Director, Cambridge Crystallographic
Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK.
(
6
S0022-3263(97)00157-6 CCC: $14.00 © 1997 American Chemical Society