S.D. Dindulkar et al. / Carbohydrate Research 430 (2016) 85–94
89
1
mol% Pd(OAc)
2
(Table 1, entry 13). It is also imperative to mention
system in promoting aqueous Mizoroki–Heck cross-coupling reac-
tions. In this differentiation study, control experiments were carried
that instead of 1.0 equivalent alkene, the use of 1.2 equivalents of
alkene gives a better yield. In order to elucidate the role of
β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) for these reactions in aqueous media, a con-
out with different substrates using PdL
Pd(OAc) and the results are displayed in Table 3.
As seen in Table 3, when coupling reactions were carried out using
the PdL @β-CD catalytic system (A) and L @-β-CD/Pd(OAc) (B), L @-
β-CD/Pd(OAc) gave a marginally lower yield after prolonged reaction
times as compared to the PdL @β-CD catalytic system (A). On the
contrary, a lesser amount of PdL @β-CD catalyst is sufficient to ac-
celerate the reaction and gave a better yield in less time. From the
overall observations, we concluded that presynthesized PdL @β-
CD complex has better catalytic activity and catalytic efficiency
compared with the in-situ generated PdL @β-CD complex (Fig. 3).
Water solubility and easy recovery are the most important prop-
erties of this PdL @β-CD catalyst, which make the catalyst more
applicable in the field of reusable catalysts. This motivated us to in-
vestigate the reusability of the PdL @β-CD catalyst for a minimum of
n n
@β-CD and L @β-CD/
2
trolled reaction was carried out using β-CD (10 mol%) and Pd(OAc)
5 mol%). A very trace product formation was observed using un-
2
(
n
n
2
n
modified β-cyclodextrin as catalyst even after 12 hours of reaction
time (Table 1, entry 15), which indicates the importance of the ligand
group in CD to stabilize Pd(OAc)
important role of β-CD cavity for Mizoroki–Heck cross coupling re-
action was confirmed by the use of PdL @β-CD catalyst with its pre-
blocked cavity using adamantane carboxylate as competitive guest
for controlled reaction (Table 1, 16). As adamantane carboxylate is
well reported as standard guest which perfectly fits deep in the beta-
cyclodextrin cavity, the carboxylate group is exposed to solution at
the wider opening of β-cyclodextrin.34 There was no significant
product formation observed (on TLC), even after 12 hours of reac-
tion time (Table 1, entry 16). The effect of inhibitor (adamantane
carboxylate) on Mizoroki–Heck cross-coupling reactions clearly
suggest that the hydrophobic cavity of cyclodextrin plays a vital role
for this cross-coupling reaction.
2
n
2
in this reaction. Furthermore, the
n
n
n
n
n
n
three more reaction cycles. For this investigation, we carried out a
set of reusability tests using the recycled catalyst (Table 4). After com-
pletion of the reaction, extraction of the product was carried out using
ethyl acetate. The catalyst was simply reprecipitated from the aqueous
layer by the addition of 10 mL of acetone. The recovered catalyst was
filtered, washed with acetone (3 × 5 mL) and dried in a vacuum at
The overall optimization study clearly confirms the minimum
optimal reaction condition: 1.0 mmol aryl halide, 1.2 mmol alkene,
3
mol% of PdL
n
@β-CD, 1.5 mmol K
2
c
CO
3
, 4.0 mL H
2
O reflux under
n
70 °C for 5 h. The recovered PdL @β-CD catalyst was tested in up to
aerobic conditions (Table 1, entry 7 ).
three more reaction cycles. The cross-coupled product (E)-1,2-
diphenylethene was obtained in 90%, 90%, and 87% yields after
successive cycles. Recycling and reusability experiments showed neg-
ligible loss of activity.
After successful development of the optimal catalytic system, we
further proceeded to explore the generality and efficiency of the de-
veloped protocol using various aryl iodides and aryl bromides with
different aryl alkenes such as styrene and 4-bromo-styrene as well
as aliphatic alkenes, such as methyl acrylate, 5-hexene-2-one and
A possible mechanism for this Mizoroki–Heck cross-coupling re-
action is extrapolated from the obtained results and on the basis
1
5,41,42
5-hexenenitrile. Remarkably, PdL
n
@β-CD catalyst showed highly ef-
of reported literature (Scheme 2).
addition of an aryl halide to the PdL
In the first step, oxidative
n
@β-CD complex leads to the
ficient catalytic activity for these cross-coupling reactions, which
afforded good to excellent yield with a turnover number (TON) up
to 31.66 (Table 2). All new compounds were completely character-
formation of a Pd-chelated complex (intermediate-II). Subsequent
dissociation of halide from the formed intermediate leads to for-
mation of a cationic Π-complex (intermediate-III). Afterwards, syn-
insertion of the alkene occurs through a carbometallation reaction
to generate a palladium (II) alkyl complex (intermediate-IV) that
undergoes palladium hydride elimination (β-hydride elimination)
to furnish the Heck product, and base assisted elimination from the
hydridopalladium complex regenerates the catalytically active Pd
(0) complex for further reaction cycles.
1
ized by their analytical and spectral data. The melting point, H NMR,
and 1 C NMR data of the known compounds were in good agree-
3
ment with those in the literature.
The substrates with electron rich functionality, such as -CH
forded coupling products in good yield, but after long reaction times
Table 2, entries 14, 15). In contrast, aryl iodide-containing elec-
tron withdrawing groups, such as p-COCH and o-COCH , gave
excellent yields in short reaction times (Table 2, entries 16–18 and
3
, af-
(
3
3
2
4
1). On the other hand, electronegative substitutes such as 4-bromo,
-fluoro and 3,5-di-fluoro substitute on styrene and aryl halide gave
3. Conclusions
moderate to good yields after long reaction time (Table 2, entries
, 8, 9, 17, 19 and 20). The hydrophilic substitutes such as hy-
droxyl groups on aryl halide had a marked influence, which gives
biaryl compounds in moderate yield in relatively long reaction time
In summary, we designed and synthesized a novel water-
7
soluble palladium catalyst based aminopyridine modified
β-cyclodextrin (PdLn@β-CD). In this cross-coupling reaction,
olefination of iodo and bromoarenes using different aryl as well as
aliphatic olefins gave the corresponding coupling products good to
excellent yields without the use of an inert atmosphere. This cata-
lytic system was found to be sensitive to electronegative and
hydrophilic functional substrates. Moreover, the catalyst could be
easily recovered and reused without significant loss of activity. The
catalyst is proved to be an efficient and environmentally benign cat-
alyst for Mizoroki–Heck cross-coupling reactions in neat water and
could be an incredible approach in the field of water soluble cata-
lysts to mediate aqueous organic reactions.
(
Table 2, entries 5 and 6). We also performed coupling reactions
between bromobenzene and different olefins. Unlike iodobenzene,
bromobenzene did not give a satisfactory yield with the use of 3 mol%
PdL @β-CD catalyst. This poor yield of the biaryl product may be
n
due to the low reactivity of bromobenzene, poor water solubility,
or lack of β-CD hydrophobic cavities in the reaction system. So we
further optimized the reaction condition for bromobenzene and sig-
nificant results were obtained with 5 mol% PdL
8
1
n
@β-CD catalyst at
0 °C in a water/DMF (1:3) aqueous biphasic system (Table 2, entries
0–13). The catalytic system also gave excellent yields with the use
of substituted aryl olefin (Table 2, entries 8 and 17). This catalytic
system is not only efficient with the use of aryl olefin but ali-
phatic olefins like methyl acrylate, 5-hexene-2-one and
4. Experimental
5
-hexenenitrile also gave corresponding products in good yield
4.1. Materials and methods
(
Table 2, entries, 2–6, 9, 11–13, 15, 18, 20 and 21).
Furthermore, we also clarified the comparative catalytic effi-
All high purity chemicals and reaction solvents were pur-
chased from Sigma-Aldrich and used without further purification.
ciency and the catalytic activity of individual use of PdL
n
@β-CD over
the separate use of L @β-CD and the palladium acetate catalytic
n
2 5
Anhydrous DMF was prepared by vacuum distillation over P O and