Angewandte
Chemie
We first need to create a material that is interfacially
active for producing an emulsion, pH-responsive, and suitable
to be used as a catalyst support (although pH-responsive
[6a,8a,d]
emulsifiers appear in literature,
most of them are
polymers. For catalysis, inorganic materials are preferred
owing to their high stability). We used a mixture of hydro-
phobic (MeO) Si(CH ) CH and relatively hydrophilic, pH-
3
2
7
3
sensitive (MeO) SiCH CH CH (NHCH CH ) NH to modify
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
the silica microsphere (SM) by covalent linkage, leading to
triamine–octyl bifunctionalized hairy silica microsphere (Fig-
ure 1b). To obtain the desired surface chemistry, the molar
fraction of triamine silane in the mixture was varied from 3%
to 4% and 5% (the total amount of organosilanes was kept
constant); the resultant silica microspheres are denoted as
SM-CN(x) (x = 3–5, respectively). For comparison, we also
synthesized octyl-monofunctionalized and triamine-mono-
functionalized silica microspheres, denoted SM-C and SM-
N, respectively.
SM-CN(x) was characterized with TEM (Figure 1c) and
elemental analysis (Table S1 in Supporting Information), X-
ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Figure S1 in Support-
ing Information), and thermogravimetry (TG, Figure S2 in
Supporting Information). SM-CN(x) is spherical in morphol-
ogy and its diameter is in a range of 250–350 nm (Figure 1c).
According to the elemental analysis results, the triamine
loading on SM-N is much higher than the octyl loading on
SM-C because the alkaline triamine itself has ability to
catalyze the surface silylation (Figure 1d). For the bifunction-
alized samples, both the triamine and octyl loadings gradually
increase from SM-CN(3) to SM-CN(4) and SM-CN(5).
Notably, the molar ratio of triamine to octyl gradually
decreases, suggesting that the surface chemistry can be
influenced by changing the molar fractions of these two
organosilane.
Figure 2. The appearance of toluene/water systems in the presence of
various silica microspheres (all photographs were taken after the
samples had being stabilized for 0.5 h). A) the biphasic system
contains 4 mL of toluene, 4 mL of water, and 0.032 g of silica micro-
sphere or functionalized silica microsphere; B) adding a few drops of
À1
HCl (1 molL ) to (A) the pH value is adjusted to 3–4; C) adding a few
À1
drops of NaOH (1 molL ) to (B) and the pH value is re-adjusted to
7–8.
The differences in the emulsion-inversion ability are
related to the pH-responsive surface chemistry. As shown in
Figure 3d (zeta potentials), under the neutral conditions
(pH 6.8), the zeta potential SM-CN(4) was measured to be
approximately 0. Under the acidic conditions (pH 3.1), it was
+ 30.1 mV, indicating the protonation of the surface triamine.
As the pH value increased, the zeta potential gradually
decreased owing to the deprotonation of protonated tria-
mines. When the pH value reached 7.9, the zeta potential
became slightly negative (À3.1 mV), suggesting a nearly full
deprotonation of the protonated triamines. The triamine
protonation at the low pH values makes the SM-CN(4)
surface hydrophilic owing to it bearing charges, whereas the
deprotonation of protonated triamines at the high pH values
renders the SM-CN(4) surface hydrophobic. This pH-trig-
gered hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity switching was confirmed
by water contact angle measurements (Figure 3d). The water
contact angle of fresh SM-CN(4) was 1108 (Figure 3d
point a), whereas the water contact angle of SM-CN(4)
treated with an acidic aqueous solution (pH 3.9) decreased
down to 618 (point b). When the protonated SM-CN(4) was
further treated with a basic solution (pH 7.9) its water contact
angle restore the value (1098, point c). As expected, such
changes drive the SM-CN(4)- and SM-CN(3)-stabilized
emulsion inversion between o/w and w/o (the emulsion
types were verified by the conductivity measurement and
We examined the interfacial activity and emulsion-inver-
sion ability of the synthesized samples. After addition of an
equal volume of toluene into water containing 0.8 wt% of the
sample (with respect to water), and subsequent shaking
(
800 rpm for 3 min) or vigorous stirring (3000 rpm for 5 min),
different phenomena were observed for these samples
Figure 2). Bare silica microsphere (SM) precipitated at the
(
bottom, while SM-N was mainly dispersed in water layer. SM-
C, SM-CN(3), SM-CN(4), and SM-CN(5) were well distrib-
uted in the bottom layer with good stability against sedimen-
tation (at least two weeks). Optical microscopy confirmed
that the bottom layer was a Pickering emulsion phase because
spherical droplets were clearly observed (microscopic images
for SM-CN(4) in Figure 3a, microscopic images for other
samples in Figure S3 in Supporting Information). Interest-
ingly, after adding a few drops of aqueous HCl solution and
stirring, only SM-CN(3) and SM-CN(4) transferred to the
upper layer where Pickering emulsion was also observed
(
Figure 2, Figure 3b SM-CN(4) has a better emulsifying
efficiency than SM-CN(3), judging from the emulsion phase
height). More interestingly, SM-CN(3) and SM-CN(4) again
rapidly transferred back to the bottom layer after a few drops
of NaOH solution were added (Figure 2), where emulsion
droplets were still observed (Figure 3c).
[
8]
emulsion droplet test). The hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity
of SM and SM-C is almost unchangeable because of the
absence of a pH-sensitive moiety. SM-N is relatively hydro-
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 1 – 6
ꢀ 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
3
These are not the final page numbers!