8
Helvetica Chimica Acta ± Vol. 88 (2005)
Method 2. A soln. (50 ml) of PhOH (1.852 g, 19.7 mmol) and KOH (1.245 g, 22.2 mmol) in H2O, and a soln.
(50 ml) of PhCH2Br (1.20 ml, 10.1 mmol) and Bu4NI (TBAI; 848 mg, 2.30 mmol) in CHCl3 were used; with a
residence time of 40 min at 508. For GC analysis, the reactor eluant collected into 0.1m HCl, extracted with
CHCl3, washed with H2O, and dried (Na2SO4) to afford benzyl phenyl ether in 87% yield.
Synthesis of 3a,4,7,7a-Tetrahydro-5,6-dimethylisobenzofuran-1,3-dione (Diels ± Alder Reaction). The
microreaction plant consisted of three cross-flow heat-exchangers, a stack-type micromixer, and a temp.-
controlled cap. reactor. A soln. (50 ml) of maleic anhydride (4.67 g, 48 mmol) in 1-methylpyrolidin-2-one
(NMP) and a soln. (50 ml) of 2,3-dimethylbuta-1,3-diene (8.1 g, 100 mmol) in NMP were combined and flowed
with a residence time of 30 min at 608, cooling to 208 after reaction. For GC analysis, the reactor eluant was
collected into CHCl3 and analyzed immediately to afford the title compound in 98% yield.
Synthesis of Ethyl Cinnamate.( Ethyl 3-Phenylprop-2-enoate). Method 1: Horner± Wadsworth ± Emmons
Reaction. The microreaction plant consisted of three cross-flow heat-exchangers, a stack-type micromixer, and a
temp.-controlled cap. reactor. A soln. (30 ml) of PhCHO (650 ml, 6.40 mmol) and 1,5,7-triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-
5-ene (TBD; 898 mg, 6.45 mmol) in MeCN was combined with a soln. (30 ml) of triethyl phosphonoacetate
(1.228 g, 5.48 mmol) in MeCN, and flowed at 508 with a residence time of 10 min, cooling to 208 after reaction.
For GC analysis, the reactor eluant was collected into 10% NH4Cl soln., extracted with AcOEt, and dried
(Na2SO4) to afford the title compound in 91% yield.
Method 2: Heck Reaction. The microreaction plant consist of two cross-flow heat-exchangers, a stack-type
micromixer, and a temp.-controlled cartridge reactor. A soln. (50 ml) of ethyl acrylate (2.70 g, 26.9 mmol) in
NMP and a soln. (50 ml) of PhI (3.46 g, 16.9 mmol) and Et3N (1.69 g, 16,7 mmol) in NMP were flowed through a
solid-phase cartridge reactor loaded with 10% Pd on C (116 mg) at 1308 with a residence time of 30 min. For GC
analysis, the reactor eluant was collected in H2O, extracted with Et2O, and dried (Na2SO4) to afford the ethyl
cinnamate in 95% yield.
Synthesis of 2-Nitro-1-phenylethanol (Nitroaldol Addition, Henry Reaction). The microreaction plant
consisted of two cross-flow heat-exchangers, a stack-type micromixer, and a temp.-controlled cap. reactor. A
soln. (50 ml) of PhCHO (10.5 g, 99.3 mmol) and 11.4 g (186 mmol) MeNO2 in i-PrOH was combined with a soln.
(50 ml) of TBD (2.78 g, 20.0 mmol) in i-PrOH at 28, and flowed at 208 with a residence time of 10 min. For GC
analysis, the reactor eluant was collected into 10% NH4Cl soln., extracted with Et2O, and dried (Na2SO4) to
afford the title compound in 78% yield.
Synthesis of Benzylidene-acetone (4-Phenylbut-3-en-2-one) and Dibenzylidene-acetone (1,5-Diphenyl-
penta-1,4-dien-3-one) (Aldol Condensation). The microreaction plant consisted of three micromixers and a cap.
reactor. In the first micromixer, a soln. of 0.5m acetone in EtOH is mixed with a soln. of 0.25m PhCHO in EtOH.
Subsequently, the obtained mixture is mixed with a soln. of 1.5m KOH in EtOH and is allowed to pass through
the cap. reactor at 208. For GC analysis, the eluant was quenched by 50% AcOH and extracted by CH2Cl2 to
afford benzylidene-acetone in 59% yield and dibenzylidene-acetone, in 20% yield.
This research was supported by GlaxoSmithKline (Scholar Award to P.H.S.), the Alfred P. Sloan
Foundation (Fellowship to P.H.S.), and Merck (Academic Development Program Award to P.H.S.). Fruitful
cooperation with Dr. M. Adamczyk of Mettler Toledo GmbH concerning the FT-IR measurements is gratefully
acknowledged.
REFERENCES
[1] P. D. I. Fletcher, S. J. Haswell, E. Pombo-Villar, B. H. Warrington, P. Watts, S. Y. F. Wong, X. Zhang,
Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 4735; G. M. Greenway, S. J. Haswell, P. H. Petsul, Anal. Chim. Acta. 1999, 387, 1; D. J.
Harrison, K. Fluri, K. Seiler, Z. Fan, C. S. Effenhauser, A. Manz, Science 1993, 261, 895.
[2] W. Ehrfeld, Chimia 2002, 56, 598; W. Ehrfeld, in ꢁProcess Intensification through Microreaction
Technologyꢂ, in ꢁRe-Engineering the Chemical Processing Plant: Process Intensificationꢂ, Eds. A.
Stankieewicz, A. Moulijin, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2003; C. de Bellefon, N. Tanchoux, S. Caravieilhes,
P. Grenouillet, V. Hessel, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3442.
[3] S. K. Ajmera, M. W. Losey, K. F. Jensen, M. A. Schmidt, AIChE J. 2001, 47, 1639; K. F. Jensen, Chem. Eng.
Sci. 2001, 56, 293.
[4] S. M. Senkan, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 312; S. M. Senkan, S. Ozturk, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999,
38, 791; S. M. Senkan, Nature 1998, 394, 350.
[5] T. Schwalbe, V. Autze, G. Willie, Chimia 2002, 56, 636.