COMMUNICATIONS
tion.[11] Solid superbases like alkali metal promoted oxides are
used in industry for the isomerization of polycyclic alkenes or
in side-chain alkylations of alkylbenzenes.[12] In the case of
silicon nitride, the covalent network is advantageous to
achieve shape selectivity through pore-size engineering, as
opposed to nonporous basic oxide supports like MgO or
Al O . Zeolites are less suitable for such reactions due to a
Summarizing, we have demonstrated that pore-size tailor-
ing of silicon imido nitride is possible. The compounds
described here represent a new class of shape-selective solid
superbase catalysts.
2
3
Experimental Section
high number of acidic sites. However, the catalytic isomer-
ization of 1-butene has been reported over sodium metal
clusters located in high-alumina zeolites.
The educt and product selectivity of our nitrides is
demonstrated by comparing the performance of microporous
All operations were performed using an argon-filled glove box or a vacuum
line and dry solvents. Alkylamines (Merck, Aldrich) were dried in vacuum
prior to use. Tris(dimethylamino)silylamine was prepared according to a
[
13]
[
8]
procedure previously reported and characterized by GC/MS. Typically,
the liquid precursor (1.00 mmol) was added to a solution of CH (CH NH
3
2
)
n
2
(
2 g, n 11 ± 17) in boiling acetonitrile (20 mL, saturated with gaseous
(
d 1.7 nm) and mesoporous (d 5.6 nm) silicon nitride
av
av
ammonia). After 1 h stirring, the reaction mixture was cooled to room
temperature and a gel formed at the bottom of the flask. After washing
with hot acetonitrile, the gel was dried in vacuum and heated slowly to
823 K in a dynamic ammonia atmosphere (1 bar) to give a yellowish, X-ray
amorphous silicon imido nitride powder.
catalysts (Table 2). The side-chain alkylation of toluene with
styrene (Scheme 2) proceeds within minutes with the meso-
porous catalyst and produces also higher addition products. In
Nitrogen physisorption measurements were performed on a Micromeritics
Table 2. Conversion [%] over potassium-promoted micro- and mesopo-
rous silicon imido nitride (reaction time in parentheses).
2
000 apparatus. The micropore volume was deduced from the total amount
nitrogen adsorbed at P/P
0.2. The Micromeritics DFT program was used
to estimate absolute pore sizes. For Si MAS NMR experiments, a
0
[
14]
29
Reaction
Microporous
catalyst
Mesoporous
catalyst
Bruker Avance 500WB instrument was used. The spectra were recorded
using a single-pulse excitation (p/2, 4.5 ms) with a repetition time of 60 s and
a MAS frequency of 5.0 kHz.
The general procedure for potassium promotion is described elsewhere.[11]
All test reactions were carried out at 295 K. For alkene isomerizations,
1-hexene and 1-hexadecene were mixed (1:1) and 2 mL of the mixture was
added to the catalyst (100 mg). The ethylation was carried out in a 50 mL
steel autoclave at a pressure of 20 ± 30 bar loaded with 10 mL toluene. The
product composition was analyzed by means of GC/MS and 1H NMR
spectroscopy.
(
dav 1.7 nm)
(dav 5.6 nm)
[
a]
74.0 (60 h)[c]
0.0 (48 h)
99.3 (18 h)
0.0 (18 h)
25.0 (96 h)[d]
100.0 (10 min)
95.5 (2 min)
80.8 (2 min)
toluene ethene
[a]
toluene styrene
[
b]
1
1
-hexene
-hexadecene[
b]
[
a] Scheme 2. [b] Double bond shift. [c] 30 bar. [d] 20 bar.
Received: June 13, 2001 [Z17285]
[1] J. M. Thomas, W. J. Thomas, Principles and Practice of Heterogeneous
Catalysis, VCH, Weinheim, 1997, p. 257.
[2] a) J. Y. Ying, C. P. Mehnert, M. S. Wong, Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 58 ±
8
2; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 56 ± 77; b) T. J. Barton, L. M. Bull,
W. G. Klemperer, D. A. Loy, B. McEnaney, M. Misono, P. A. Monson,
G. Pez, G. W. Scherer, J. C. Vartuli, O. M. Yaghi, Chem. Mater. 1999,
1
1, 2633 ± 2656; c) G. Oye, J. Sjoblom, M. Stocker, Adv. Colloid
Scheme 2.
Interface Sci. 2001, 89, 439 ± 466; d) A. Stein, B. J. Melde, R. C.
Schroden, Adv. Mater. 2000, 12, 1403 ± 1419; e) J. Weitkamp, Solid
State Ionics 2000, 131, 175 ± 188; f) U. Ciesla, F. Schüth, Microporous
Mesoporous Mater. 1999, 27, 131 ± 149; g) A. Sayari, P. Liu, Micro-
porous Mater. 1997, 12, 149 ± 177; h) N. K. Raman, M. T. Anderson,
C. J. Brinker, Chem. Mater. 1996, 8, 1682 ± 1701; i) H. L. Frisch, J. E.
Mark, Chem. Mater. 1996, 8, 1735 ± 1738.
contrast, the microporous catalyst gives no conversion due to
the bulky character of the products. The alkylation reaction
with ethene on the other hand (Scheme 2) proceeds smoothly
with both catalysts, and at higher ethene pressures (30 bar)
the dialkylation product forms even over the microporous
catalyst since both propylbenzene and (1-ethylpropyl)ben-
zene fit in the secondary micropores.
Similar differences between micro- and mesoporous ni-
trides are observed in alkene isomerization reactions. Using
the mesoporous catalyst, isomerization of 1-hexene and
[3] a) S. A. Schunk, F. Schüth in Molecular Sieves, Vol. 1 (Eds.: H. G.
Karge, J. Weitkamp), Springer, Heidelberg, 1998, pp. 229 ± 263;
b) A. K. Cheetham, G. Ferey, T. Loiseau, Angew. Chem. 1999, 111,
3
466 ± 3492; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 3269 ± 3292.
[
4] a) W. Schnick, J. Lücke, Angew. Chem. 1992, 104, 208 ± 209; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1992, 31, 213 ± 215; b) W. Schnick, J. Lücke, Z.
Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1994, 620, 2014 ± 2019; c) W. Schnick, Stud. Surf.
Sci. Catal. 1994, 84, 2221 ± 2228; d) W. Schnick, N. Stock, J. Lücke, M.
Volkmann, M. Jansen, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1995, 621, 987 ± 992; e) J.
Weitkamp, S. Ernst, F. Cubero, F. Wester, W. Schnick, Adv. Mater.
1-hexadecene (1:1 mixture) to the more stable alkenes with
inner double bonds proceeds within minutes for both
substrates. The microporous solid converts instead only the
shorter substrate 1-hexene, and the pure 1-hexadecene can be
recovered from the mixture. These selectivity differences
confirm the results of the nitrogen adsorption measurements.
Probably the calculated pore radii are a little to high as
compared to the size of the substrates and products, which is
due to the limitations of the pore size analysis.
1
997, 9, 247 ± 248; f) N. Stock, E. Irran, W. Schnick, Chem. Eur. J. 1998,
4, 1822 ± 1828.
[5] a) F. L. Riley, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2000, 83, 245 ± 265; b) C. Haluschka,
H. J. Kleebe, R. Franke, R. Riedel, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2000, 20, 1355 ±
1
364; c) A. O. Gabriel, R. Riedel, Angew. Chem. 1997, 109, 371 ± 373;
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 384 ± 386; d) A. O. Gabriel, R.
Riedel, S. Storck, W. F. Maier, Appl. Organomet. Chem. 1997, 11, 833 ±
841.
4206
ꢀ WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH, D-69451 Weinheim, 2001
1433-7851/01/4022-4206 $ 17.50+.50/0
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, No. 22