Organometallics
Article
structure (as in 1NMe and 1Me in entries 15 and 16, Table 1)
because it promotes the formation of product B. These results
are similar to entry 20 in Table 1, which shows the effect of
triflic acid alone.
Table 2. Hydrodeoxygenation of Vanillyl Alcohol with 1OH
Evaluating the Identity and Quantity of Base
:
2
a
conversn
b
c
c
entry
base (mol %)
(%)
yield of A (%) yield of B (%)
In relation to the above studies with HOTf, attempts to
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
NaOtBu (10)
NaOH (10)
NaHCO3 (10)
K2CO3 (10)
Na2CO3 (1.1)
Na2CO3 (10)
Na2CO3 (25)
Na2CO3 (50)
Na2CO3 (110)
41.6(4)
50.8(8)
29.2(8)
51.1(5)
20(2)
51(2)
73(1)
98.0(4)
99.73(6)
38.1(4)
47(1)
27(1)
46.8(6)
16(2)
48(2)
69.5(4)
95.8(7)
98.8(3)
1.65(6)
2.1(1)
0.6(2)
0.8(6)
0.5(2)
1.1(2)
2(1)
protonate 1NMe with HOTf did not lead to any substantial
2
1
changes in the H NMR spectrum in DMSO. Some slight
changes were observed in the IR spectrum upon adding HOTf,
but it is possible that these changes are due to hydrogen
bonding with HOTf or H3O+ formed from adventitious water
or incomplete protonation. While the pKa value of the
conjugate acid of 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) is 9.6 in
water33 and DMAP would be protonated readily by HOTf, it is
0.2(1)
0.4(3)
possible that 1NMe is less basic than DMAP due to
2
a
All experiments were done in triplicate and were analyzed by GC.
delocalization of the lone pair on NMe2 into the pyridine
Conditions: 0.0642 M vanillyl alcohol in methanol, 1 mol % of 1OH
,
ring. In fact, the crystal structure above for 1NMe suggests that
2
b
there is substantial double-bond character for CNMe2.
External base serves to promote the HDO reaction with
several catalysts. Entry 11 (Table 1) shows that the presence of
base (50 mol % of Na2CO3) with 1OH facilitated the HDO
reaction and led to a 96% yield for product A in just 1 h. Thus,
nearly complete conversion to A is obtained by deprotonating
1OH, which enhances the π-donor properties of the pincer
further details. Conversion is calculated on the basis of starting
c
material consumption. Yield is calculated from the GC data.
conversion. Thus, the ideal conditions (50 or 110 mol % of
Na2CO3 and 1 mol % of 1OH) led to selective and nearly
complete formation of A. Using these optimal conditions (50
mol % of Na2CO3), we also explored the hydrodeoxygenation
of less activated substrates, but we see that 1OH (1 mol %) is
not effective at converting benzyl alcohol to toluene (see the
ligand (Scheme 4). The addition of base to 1OMe, 1NMe , and
2
1Me was also explored. The base should not affect the
Me
structures of 1OMe, 1NMe , or 1 ; thus, any changes in the
2
observed reactivity would not be attributed to changes in the
catalyst. As illustrated by entry 12 of Table 1, the use of base
with 1OMe generates an 88% yield of A, showing that base
accelerates the HDO reaction even in the absence of a protic
ligand (cf. entry 2 with a 31% yield of A). A base also enhances
Xu et al. have investigated the role of pH, promoters (e.g.,
formic acid), and remote directing groups in the HDO reaction
of a variety of alcohols and observed optimum yields at pH 1.6
in water. They propose an SN1 mechanism with OH2 loss from
substrate followed by hydride transfer from the catalyst to the
substrate.34 Formic acid served as a source of protons to
modulate pH, and the resulting formate was decarboxylated to
produce an iridium hydride catalyst. In our case, increased
HDO reactivity is observed with a weak base present, which
suggests that a different mechanism is operative in our study.
There appears to be an optimum balance for base strength in
our case. Sodium carbonate is strong enough to facilitate
catalyst deprotonation but does not generate any species
capable of direct binding to the active Ru centers of our
catalysts. Conversely, bases such as NaOtBu and NaOH both
generate species that may bind to the Ru centers and inhibit
catalysis; these species include tert-butoxide, hydroxide, and
methoxide from solvent deprotonation.
product B as a substrate and under optimal catalytic conditions
(with 1OH or 1OMe as the catalyst) led to slower formation of A
in comparison to the conversion of VA directly to A. In view of
our data, we propose that product B formation does not
facilitate the formation of A. This suggests two possibilities. (1)
Perhaps B must be converted to VA by any adventitious water
present before the HDO reaction can occur. (2) Alternatively,
B goes directly to A, but by a mechanism that is different from
that employed when we start with VA and it must be
inherently slower. The methylated substrate B certainly cannot
bind to ruthenium as readily as VA.
catalysis with 1NMe , and an 89% yield (entry 13) of the HDO
2
product A is obtained (vs 24% without base, entry 3).
Similarly, adding base to 1Me leads to an increased yield of A
(76% in entry 14) but a somewhat decreased percent
conversion. Comparing these results shows that the selectivity
to the desired product is increased with base present for all
four catalysts: 1R where R = OH, OMe, NMe2, Me. However,
base alone does not lead to the desired product A (entries 18
and 19, Table 1). Hydrogen activation most likely occurs via
the well-established reaction Ru + H2 → Ru−H + H+. The
generation of H+ is detrimental to the reaction selectivity, likely
by promoting the formation of the undesired product B. Thus,
the base can play two roles: it can prevent acid buildup and
undesired pathways and, when the catalyst is designed
properly, the base can further activate the catalyst to favor
formation of A vs B. Accordingly, 1OH with base is our most
selective catalyst, with an A:B ratio of 479:1. The other
Me
catalysts (1OMe, 1NMe , 1 ) do not come close to this
2
selectivity, with at best 57:1.
With the knowledge in hand that base is advantageous to the
reaction and that catalyst 1OH can be further activated by base,
the experimental conditions were systematically varied to
further enhance catalytic activity. Increasing the reaction
temperature did not have a significant effect on reaction
details). In addition, catalyst decomposition was observed at
temperatures >150 °C. Next, the identity and loading of the
base was explored (Table 2). Strong bases such as NaOH and
NaOtBu were detrimental to the reaction (entries 1 and 2).
Weak bases such as Na2CO3 gave optimal conversion and
selectivity at high base loadings (entries 4−9). The use of a
very weak base (NaHCO3, entry 3) did not lead to good
Once the optimum base loadings were established, a lower
catalyst loading of 1OH was investigated to probe whether the
catalyst can operate efficiently under very dilute conditions.
Without an increase in the reaction time beyond 1 h, the
lowest catalyst loading that results in quantitative conversion to
product A is 0.05 mol % (Na2CO3 2.5 mol %, T = 150 °C,
TON = 2000). When the temperature is lowered to 100 °C,
E
Organometallics XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX